Integrating Freight Considerations into Collaborative Decision Making for Additions to Highway Capacity (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

21 Battelle, American Transportation Research Institute, CH2M Hill, Gordon Proctor and Associates, The Gallamore Group, Starsis Cor- poration. NCFRP Report 7: Identifying and Using Low-Cost and Quickly Implementable Ways to Address Freight-System Mobility Constraints. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Freight-Rail Bottom Line Report. Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, D.C., 2003. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Enhancing Consideration of Freight in Regional Transportation Planning. Metropolitan Washington Coun- cil of Governments. 2007. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. State Rail Planning Best Practices. Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, D.C., 2009. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Economic Development Research Group, Inc., Halcrow, Inc., Decisiontek, LLC, and Boston Strate- gies International. NCFRP Report 12: Framework and Tools for Estimating Benefits of Specific Freight Network Investments. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Dowling Associates, Inc., System Metrics Group, Inc., Texas Transportation Institute. NCHRP Report 618: Cost- Effective Methods and Planning Procedures for Travel Time, Delay, and Reliability. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Economic Development Research Group, Inc., Boston Logistics Group, Inc. Guide to Quantifying the Economic Impact of Federal Investments in Large-Scale Freight Transportation Projects. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2006. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Gill V. Hicks & Associates, Inc., Network Public Affairs, LLC. NCFRP Report 2: Institutional Arrangements for Freight Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Global Insight (formerly Reebie Associ- ates), H. Cohen, A. Horowitz, and R. Pendyala. NCHRP Report 606: Forecasting Statewide Freight Toolkit. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Prime Focus, LLC, and K. Heanue. NCHRP Report 594: Guidebook for Integrating Freight into Trans- portation Planning and Project Selection Processes. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., TransManagement, TransTech Manage- ment, and K. Heanue. NCHRP Report 570: Guidebook for Freight Policy, Planning, and Programming in Small- and Medium-Sized MPOs. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Quick Response Freight Manual II. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2007. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. MAP-21—Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century. http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/. Accessed November 12, 2013. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Freight Cross-Cutting Resource Guide. (Ongoing) Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Resource Center. Training Session: Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning. IHS Global Insight. NCFRP Report 1: Public and Private Sector Inter- dependence in Freight Transportation Markets. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. Indiana Multimodal Freight and Mobility Plan. Indiana Department of Transportation, 2009. Kansas Statewide Freight Study. Kansas Department of Transportation, 2009. Maryland Statewide Freight Plan. Maryland Department of Transporta- tion, 2009. Minnesota Statewide Freight Plan. Minnesota Department of Transpor- tation, 2003. National Highway Institute. Course 129003: Advanced Freight Planning. National Highway Institute. Course 139002: Multimodal Freight Fore- casting in Transportation Planning. National Highway Institute. Course 139005: Linking Freight to Planning and the Environment. National Highway Institute. Course 139009: Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning. National Highway Institute. Course 139006: Integrating Freight into the Transportation Planning Process. NCFRP 14: Guidebook for Understanding Urban Goods Movement. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2009. NCFRP 8: Freight-Demand Modeling to Support Public-Sector Decision Making. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. Bibliography

22 Puget Sound Regional Council. Integrating the Evaluation of Freight Corridor Projects into the Congestion Management Process, and Long- Range Transportation Planning. 2009. Special Report 297: Funding Options for Freight Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2008. Transportation for Communities. Transportation for Communities— Advancing Projects through Partnerships (TCAPP). http://www .transportationforcommunities.com/. Accessed November 12, 2013. Note: TCAPP is now known as PlanWorks. U.S. Department of Transportation and National Association of Regional Councils. Building Capacity Between Public and Private Sectors in the Freight Industry: A Resource Manual. 2009. Wilbur Smith Associates and S.R. Kale Consulting LLC. Guidebook for Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Transportation Planning. Fed- eral Highway Administration. Washington, D.C., 2009.