National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 9 - Summary and Recommendations
Page 263
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 263
Page 264
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 264
Page 265
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 265
Page 266
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 266
Page 267
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 267
Page 268
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22441.
×
Page 268

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

263 AASHO Road Test: Report 4: Bridge Research. 1962. Special Report 61D. AASHO, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2013. Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Innovative Systems, Subsystems, and Components. SHRP 2 Project R19A. http:// onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2prepubR19Areport. pdf. Accessed Nov. 25. AASHTO Guide Manual for Bridge Element Inspection. 2011. Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th ed. 2008. Includes 2008 Interim. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th ed. 2009. Includes 2008 and 2009 Interims. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 5th ed. 2010. Includes 2010 Interim. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th ed. 2012. Ameri- can Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Abeles, P., F. Barton, and E. Brown, II. 1969. Fatigue Behavior of Pre- stressed Concrete Bridge Beams. In First International Symposium on Concrete Bridge Design, SP-23, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 579–599. Abeles, P., and E. Brown, II. 1971. Expected Fatigue Life of Prestressed Concrete Highway Bridges As Related to the Expected Load Spec- trum. In Second International Symposium on Concrete Bridge Design, SP-26, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 962–1010. Abeles, P., E. Brown, II, and C. Hu. 1974. Fatigue Resistance of Under- Reinforced Prestressed Beams Subjected to Different Stress Ranges; Miner’s Hypothesis. In Abeles Symposium: Fatigue of Concrete, SP-41, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 279–300. ACI Committee 201. 2008. Guide to Durable Concrete. ACI 201.2R-08. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 215. 1974. Considerations for Design of Concrete Struc- tures Subjected to Fatigue Loading. ACI 215R-74. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 1963. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. ACI 318-63. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 1977. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. ACI 318-77. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 1983. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. ACI 318-83. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 1995. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-95/318R-95. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 1999. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-99/318R-99. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 2002. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-02/318R-02. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 2005. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-05. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 2008. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-08. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI Committee 318. 2011. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. ACI 318-11. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich. ACI-ASCE Joint Committee 323. 1958. Tentative Recommendations for Prestressed Concrete. Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 545–578. Agom International, srl. 2013. Catalog for V-MAX Pot Bearings. http:// www.agom.it/index.aspx?m=85&f=3&idf=212. Accessed Nov. 25. Agrawal, A., and A. Kawaguchi. 2009. Bridge Element Deterioration Rates. Project Number C-01-51. City College of New York, Trans- portation Infrastructure Research Consortium, and New York State Department of Transportation, New York. Akbas, S., and F. Kulhawy. 2009. Axial Compression of Footings in Cohesionless Soils: I—Load-Settlement Behavior. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 11, pp. 1562–1574. Allen, T., A. Nowak, and R. Bathurst. 2005. Transportation Research Cir- cular E-C079: Calibration to Determine Load and Resistance Factors for Geotechnical and Structural Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb .org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec079.pdf. Amorn, W., J. Bowers, A. Girgis, and M. Tadros. 2007. Fatigue of Deformed Welded-Wire Reinforcement. Journal, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 106–120. Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) Bridge Design Guide- lines. 2009. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix. ASCE Committee on Deflections Limitations of Bridges of the Struc- tural Division. 1958. Deflection limitations of bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, Proc. ASCE, 84(ST 3): 1633-1 to 1633-20. References

264 ASCE/SEI 7-10: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Struc- tures. 2010. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va. Azizinamini, A., E. Power, G. Myers, and H. Ozyildirim. 2013. Design Guide for Bridges for Service Life. Prepublication draft. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Balázs, G., P. Bisch, A. Borosnyói, O. Burdet, C. Burns, F. Ceroni, V. Cervenka, M. Chiorino, P. Debernardi, L. Eckfeldt, M. El-Badry, E. Fehling, S. Foster, A. Ghali, V. Gribniak, M. Guiglia, G. Kaklauskas, R. Lark, P. Lenkei, M. Lorrain, A. Marí, J. Ozbolt, M. Pecce, A. Pérez Caldentey, M. Taliano, D. Tkalcic, J. Torrenti, L. Torres, F. Toutlemonde, T. Ueda, J. Vitek, and L. Vráblík. 2013. Design for SLS According to fib Model Code 2010. Structural Concrete, Journal of the fib, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99–123. Barker, M., and K. Barth. 2007. Live Load Deflection Serviceability of HPS Composite Steel Girder Bridges. 2007 World Steel Bridge Sym- posium Papers, New Orleans, La. Barker, M., L. Gandiaga, and J. Staebler. 2008. Serviceability Limits and Economical Steel Bridge Design. MPC-08-206. Mountain-Plains Con- sortium, Fargo, N.Dak. Barker, R., J. Duncan, K. Rojiani, P. Ooi, C. Tan, and S. Kim. 1991. NCHRP Report 343: Manuals for the Design of Bridge Foundations: Shallow Foundations, Driven Piles, Retaining Walls and Abutments, Drilled Shafts, Estimating Tolerable Movements, Load Factor Design Specifications, and Commentary. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Barth, K., and H. Wu. 2007. Development of Improved Natural Frequency Equations for Continuous Span Steel I-Girder Bridges. Engineering Structures, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 3432–3442. Bartlett, F., R. Dexter, M. Graeser, J. Jelinek, B. Schmidt, and T. Galambos. 2003. Updating Standard Shape Material Properties Database for Design and Reliability. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1–14. Beeby, A. 1979. The Prediction of Crack Widths in Hardened Concrete. The Structural Engineer, Vol. 57A, No. 1, p. 9. Biggs, J. 1964. Introduction to Structural Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York. Birrcher, D., R. Tuchscherer, M. Huizinga, O. Bayrak, S. Wood, and J. Jirsa. 2009. Strength and Serviceability Design of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams. FHWA/TX-09/0-5253-1. Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas at Austin and Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Blackman, D., and R. Frosch. 2005. Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement and Crack Control. In Serviceability of Concrete: A Symposium Honoring Dr. Edward G. Nawy, SP-225, American Concrete Institute, Farming- ton Hills, Mich., pp. 163–178. Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. Estimating the Future Condition of Highway Bridge Components Using National Bridge Inventory Data. ASCE Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 16–25. Bridge Bearings. 2006. Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering, Pune, India. Bridge Design Manual. 2006. Includes 2006 Interim and Errata. Engi- neering Division, Division of Highways, West Virginia Department of Transportation, Charleston. Bridge Design Manual. 2007. Office of Structural Engineering, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus. Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual. 2002. Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Bridge Joint Association. 2010. Current Practice Sheet. www.bridge joints.org.uk/Current%20Practice%20Sheet%20on%20Bridge %20Joints.pdf. Accessed April 13. Brockenbrough, R., and F. Merritt (eds.). 2011. Structural Steel Designer’s Handbook, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. Broms, B. 1965. Crack Width and Crack Spacing in Reinforced Concrete Members. Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 62, No. 10, p. 1237. Burland, J., and M. Burbridge. 1984. Settlement of Foundations on Sand and Gravel. Proceedings, Part I, Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1325–1381. Burton, K., and E. Hognestad. 1967. Fatigue Test of Reinforcing Bars- Tack Welding of Stirrups. Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 244–252. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. 2006. Includes Supplement 1, Supplement 2, and Supplement 3. Canadian Standards Association International, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Chang, L., and Y. Lee. 2001. Evaluation and Policy for Bridge Deck Expan- sion Joints. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2000/01. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. Choi, Y., and B. Oh. 2009. Crack Width Formula for Transversely Post- Tensioned Concrete Deck Slabs on Box Girder Bridges. Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 753–761. Clark, A. 1956. Cracking in Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members. Jour- nal Proceedings, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 52, No. 4, p. 851. Coastal Engineering Manual. 2002. Engineer Manual 1110-2-1100. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C. Committee on Deflection Limitations of Bridges of the Structural Divi- sion. 1958. Deflection Limitations. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 1633.1–1633.20. Cooper, P., T. Galambos, and M. Ravindra. 1978. LRFD Criteria for Plate Girders. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 104, No. 9, pp. 1389–1407. D’Appolonia, D., E. D’Appolonia, and R. Brissette. 1968. Settlement of Spread Footings on Sand. ASCE Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foun- dations Division, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 735–762. Das, B., and B. Sivakugan. 2007. Settlements of Shallow Foundations on Granular Soil: An Overview. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, No. 1, pp. 19–29. Detwiler, R. 2008. Protecting concrete from sulfate attack. 2008. Con- crete News, January. L&M Construction Chemicals, Inc. http://www .lmcc.com/concrete_news/0801/protecting_concrete_from_sulfate_ attack.asp. Accessed Oct. 8, 2014. Dexter, R., and J. Fisher. 2000. Fatigue and Fracture. In Bridge Engineer- ing Handbook (Chen and Duan, eds.), CRC Press, New York, pp. 53.1–53.23. Dexter, R., M. Graeser, W. Saari, C. Pascoe, C. Gardner, and T. Galambos. 2000. Structural Shape Material Property Survey. Final report. Uni- versity of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dexter, R., and M. Melendrez. 2000. Through-Thickness Properties of Column Flanges in Welded Moment Connections. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 24–31. Dowling, N. 1972. Fatigue Failure Predictions for Complicated Stress– Strain Histories. Journal of Mechanics, JMLSA, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 71–87. Downing, S., and D. Socie. 1982. Simple Rainflow Counting Algorithms. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31–40. Duncan, J. 2000. Factors of Safety and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 307–316. DuraCrete: Final Technical Report: General Guidelines for Durability Design and Redesign. 2000. Project BE95-1347/R17. European Union, Brite EuRam III, CUR, Gouda, Netherlands. Elias, V., K. Fishman, B. Christopher, and R. Berg. 2009. Corrosion/ Degradation of Soil Reinforcements for Mechanically Stabilized Earth

265 Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes. FHWA-NHI-09-087. National High- way Institute, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Ellingwood, B., J. Galambos, J. MacGregor, and C. Cornell. 1980. Devel- opment of a Probability-Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58. NBS Special Publication 577. National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce. EN 1990 (Eurocode 0): Basis of Structural Design. 2002. European Com- mittee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. EN 1991-1-6 (Eurocode 1): Actions on Structures: Part 1-6: General Actions: Actions During Execution. 2005. European Committee for Standard- ization, Brussels, Belgium. EN 1991-2 (Eurocode 1): Actions on Structures: Part 2: Traffic Loads on Bridges. 2003. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. EN 1992-2 (Eurocode 2): Design of Concrete Structures: Part 2: Concrete Bridges: Design and Detailing Rules. 2005. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. EN 1998-2 (Eurocode 8): Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance: Part 2: Bridges. 2005. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. Evaluation of Various Types of Bridge Deck Joints. 2006. FHWA-AZ- 06-510. Baker Engineering and Energy; Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix; and Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Fédération Internationale du Béton. 2006. Model Code for Service Life Design. fib Bulletin 34, p. 47. Fédération Internationale du Béton. 2010. fib Model Code for Concrete Structures. Ernst and Sohn, Berlin. Fisher, J. 1977. Bridge Fatigue Guide: Design and Details. American Insti- tute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill. Fisher, J., P. Albrecht, B. Yen, D. Klingerman, and B. McNamee. 1974. NCHRP Report 147: Fatigue Strength of Steel Beams with Trans- verse Stiffeners and Attachments. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Fisher, J., K. Frank, M. Hirt, and B. McNamee. 1970. NCHRP Report 102: Effect of Weldments on the Fatigue Strength of Steel Beams. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Fisher, J., D. Mertz, and A. Zhong. 1983. NCHRP Report 267: Steel Bridge Members Under Variable-Amplitude Long-Life Fatigue Loading. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Fisher, J. W., and I. M. Viest. 1961. Special Report 66: Fatigue Tests of Bridge Materials of the AASHO Road Test. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Fishman, K., and J. Withiam. 2011. NCHRP Report 675: LRFD Metal Loss and Service-Life Strength Reduction Factors for Metal-Reinforced Systems. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Fountain, R., and C. Thunman. 1987. Deflection Criteria for Steel High- way Bridges. Proc., AISC National Engineering Conference, American Institute of Steel Construction, New Orleans, La., pp. 20-1–20-12. Freyermuth, C. 2009. Service Life and Sustainability of Concrete Bridges. ASPIRE, Fall 2009, pp. 12–15. Frosch, R. 1999. Another Look at Cracking and Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete. Structural Journal, American Concrete Insti- tute, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 437–442. Frosch, R. 2001. Flexural Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete. In Design and Construction Practices to Mitigate Cracking, SP-204, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich., pp. 135–154. Frosch, R. 2002. Modeling and Control of Side Face Beam Cracking. Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 376–385. Geotechnical Design Manual. 2012. M 46-03.07. Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, Olympia. Gergely, P., and L. Lutz. 1968. Maximum Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete Members. In Causes, Mechanisms and Control of Crack- ing in Concrete, SP-20, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 87–117. Gifford, D., S. Kraemer, J. Wheeler, and A. McKown. 1987. Spread Foot- ings for Highway Bridges. FHWA/RD-86-185. Haley and Aldrich, Cambridge, Mass. Goodpasture, D., and W. Goodwin. 1971. Final Report on the Evaluation of Bridge Vibration As Related to Bridge Deck Performance. University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Tennessee Department of Transportation, Nashville; and Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Grant, R., J. Christian, and E. Vanmarcke. 1974. Differential Settlement of Buildings. ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. 9, pp. 973–991. Gross, S., and S. Burns. 2000. Field Performance of Prestressed High Per- formance Concrete Bridges in Texas. FHWA/TX-05/9-580/589-2. Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation, Austin. Hansell, W., T. Galambos, M. Ravindra, and I. Viest. 1978. Composite Beam Criteria in LRFD. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 104, No. 9, pp. 1409–1426. Hanson, J. M., K. T. Burton, and E. Hognestad. 1968. Fatigue Tests of Reinforcing Bars: Effect of Deformation Pattern. Journal of the Port- land Cement Association Research and Development Laboratories, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 2–13. Hanson, J., C. Hulsbos, and D. VanHorn. 1970. Fatigue Tests of Pre- stressed Concrete I-Beams. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 96, No. 11, pp. 2443–2464. Hatami, A., and A. Morcous. 2011. Developing Deterioration Models for Nebraska Bridges. Project No. SPR-P1(11) M302. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, and Nebraska Department of Roads, Omaha. Helgason, T., J. Hanson, N. Somes, W. Corley, and E. Hognestad. 1976. NCHRP Report 164: Fatigue Strength of High-Yield Reinforcing Bars. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Helland, S. 2013. Design for Service Life: Implementation of fib Model Code 2010, Rules in the Operational Code ISO 16204. Structural Concrete, Journal of the fib, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 10–18. Hilsdorf, H., and C. Kesler. 1966. Fatigue Strength of Concrete Under Varying Flexural Stresses. Journal Proceedings, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 63, No. 10, pp. 1059–1076. Hough, B. 1959. Compressibility as the Basis for Soil Bearing Value. ASCE Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 11–40. Imbsen, R. A., D. E. Vandershaf, R. A. Schamber, and R. V. Nutt. 1985. NCHRP Report 276: Thermal Effects in Concrete Bridge Superstructures. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. International Code Council. 2007. 2006 Seattle Building Code. ICC, Washington, D.C. ISO 2394: General Principles on Reliability for Structures, 3rd ed. 1998. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Itoh, Y., and T. Kitagawa. 2001. Bridge Lifecycle Analysis and Dura- bility Evaluation Using Accelerated Exposure Test. Presented at U.S.–Japan Seminar on Advanced Stability and Seismicity Concept for Performance-Based Design of Steel and Composite Structures, Kyoto, Japan. Jiang, Y., and K. Sinha. 1989. The Development of Optimal Strategies for Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and Replacement of Highway Bridges: Volume 6: Performance Analysis and Optimization. FHWA/IN/JHRP- 89/13. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., and Indiana Depart- ment of Transportation, Indianapolis. Kaar, P., and A. Mattock. 1963. High-Strength Bars As Concrete Re inforcement, Part 4: Control of Cracking. Portland Cement Asso- ciation Development Department Bulletin D59, pp. 15–38.

266 Kaczinski, M. 2008. New Developments in Expansion Joints, Bearings, Cable Corrosion Protection, and Grid Deck Systems. Presented at 2008 IBTTA Fall Maintenance Meeting, New Orleans, La. Keating, P. B., and J. W. Fisher. 1986. NCHRP Report 286: Evaluation of Fatigue Tests and Design Criteria on Welded Details. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Klaiber, F., T. Wipf, and F. Russo. 2004. NCHRP Synthesis 327: Cost- Effective Practices for Off-System and Local Interest Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Krauss, P., and E. Rogalla. 1996. NCHRP Report 380: Transverse Cracking in Newly Constructed Bridge Decks. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Kulicki, J., Z. Prucz, C. Clancy, D. Mertz, and A. Nowak. 2007. Updating the Calibration Report for AASHTO LRFD Code. Report on NCHRP Project 20-7/186. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Kulicki, J., W. Wassef, D. Mertz, A. Nowak, N. Samtani, and H. Nassif. 2013. Service Load Design for 100-Year Life. SHRP 2 Project R19B. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (Draft.) Kupfer, H., and K. Gerstle. 1973. Behavior of Concrete Under Biaxial Stress. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 99, No. 4, pp. 853–866. Langley, W. 1999. Concrete Mix Proportioning to Meet Durability Concerns for Confederation Bridge. In High-Performance Concrete: Performance and Quality of Concrete Structures, SP-186, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 129–148. Lash, S. 1969. Can High-Strength Reinforcement Be Used in Highway Bridges? In First International Symposium on Concrete Bridge Design, SP-23, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Mich., pp. 283–300. Lind, N., and A. Nowak. 1978. Calculation of Load and Performance Factors. Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Toronto, Canada. LRFD Bridge Design Manual. 2006. Louisiana Department of Transpor- tation and Development, Baton Rouge. MacGregor, J., I. Jhamb, and N. Nuttall. 1971. Fatigue Strength of Hot- Rolled Deformed Reinforcing Bars. Journal Proceedings, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 169–179. Main Roads Specification MRS81: Bridge Bearings. 2012. MRS81. Queensland Government, Department of Main Roads, Queensland, Australia. Manual for Bridge Evaluation. 2008. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Maryland Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. 2006. Includes Revision 1, July 2009. Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore. Matsuishi, M., and T. Endo. 1968. Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuoka, Japan. Maurer Söhne. 2011. Maurer MSM Sliding Bearings. http://www.maurer .co.uk/doc/MSM_Prospekt_1208_engl.pdf. Accessed Nov. 25. Maurer Söhne. 2013. Head Made of Stainless Steel: Expansion Joints with Hybrid Profile. http://www.maurer-soehne.com/files/bauwerk schutzsysteme/pdf/de/news/MAU_PR_Hybrid_Profile_0707_engl .pdf. Accessed Nov. 25. Merriam-Webster. 2010. Deterioration. http://www.merriam-webster .com/dictionary/deterioration. Accessed Nov. 25. Merriam-Webster. 2010. Maintenance. http://www.merriam-webster .com/dictionary/maintenance. Accessed Nov. 25. Merriam-Webster. 2010. Serviceable. http://www.merriam-webster .com/dictionary/serviceable. Accessed Nov. 25. Miner, M. 1945. Cumulative Damage in Fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 12, pp. A159–A164. Mirza, S. 2007. Design of Durable and Sustainable Concrete Bridges. Proc., CBM-CI International Workshop, NED University of Engineer- ing and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan, pp. 333–344. Mirza, S., and J. MacGregor. 1979a. Variability of Mechanical Properties of Reinforcing Bars. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 105, No. 5, pp. 921–937. Mirza, S., and J. MacGregor. 1979b. Variations in Dimensions of Re inforced Concrete Members. ASCE Journal of the Structural Divi- sion, Vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 751–766. Miska. 2013. Compression Seals: Neoprene. www.miska.com.au/ebm3- doc/130914/comsealdatasheet.pdf. Accessed May 9. Mlynarski, M., W. Wassef, and A. Nowak. 2011. NCHRP Report 700: A Comparison of AASHTO Bridge Load Rating Methods. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Moulton, L., H. Ganga Rao, and G. Halvorsen. 1985. Tolerable Movement Criteria for Highway Bridges. FHWA/RD-85-107. West Virginia Uni- versity, Morgantown. Murray, T., D. Allen, and E. Ungar. 2003. Design Guide 11: Floor Vibrations Due to Human Activity. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill. Musso, A., and P. Provenzano. 2003. Discussion of Predicting Settle- ment of Shallow Foundations Using Neural Networks. ASCE Jour- nal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 12, pp. 1172–1175. Nawy, E., and P. Huang. 1977. Crack and Deflection Control of Pre- tensioned Prestressed Beams. Journal, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 30–43. NCHRP Research Results Digest 197: Fatigue Behavior of Welded and Mechanical Splices in Reinforcing Steel. 1994. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Nevels, J., and D. Hixon. 1973. A Study to Determine the Causes of Bridge Deck Deterioration. Research and Development Division, Oklahoma Department of Highways, Oklahoma City. Nowak, A. 1999. NCHRP Report 368: Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Nowak, A., and K. Collins. 2013. Reliability of Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York. Nowak, A., E. Szeliga, and M. Szerszen. 2008. Reliability-Based Calibra- tion for Structural Concrete, Phase 3. Portland Cement Association Research and Development Serial No. 2849, pp. 1–110. Okeil, A. 2006. Allowable Tensile Stress for Webs of Prestressed Segmen- tal Concrete Bridges. Structural Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 488–495. Oluokun, F. 1991. Prediction of Concrete Tensile Strength from Its Compressive Strength: Evaluation of Existing Relations for Normal- Weight Concrete. Materials Journal, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 302–309. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code. 1979. Ontario Ministry of Trans- portation, Toronto, Canada. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code. 1991. Ontario Ministry of Trans- portation, Toronto, Canada. Ontario Traffic Manual: Book 5: Regulatory Signs. 2000. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Toronto, Canada. Ople, F. S., and C. L. Hulsbos. 1966. Probable Fatigue Life of Plain Con- crete with Stress Gradient. Journal Proceedings, American Concrete Institute, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 59–82. Outokumpu. 2013. Sustainable Bridges: 300 Year Design Life for Sec- ond Gateway Bridge. http://www.outokumpu.com/SiteCollection

267 Documents/SiteCollectionDocumentsSuistanable%20Bridges_ 44664.pdf. Accessed Nov. 25. Palmgren, A. 1924. Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern [Life Length of Roller Bearings (in German)]. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI Zeitschrift), Vol. 68, No. 14, pp. 339–341. Peck, R., and A. Bazaraa. 1969. Discussion of Settlement of Spread Foot- ings on Sand. ASCE Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 900–916. Pelphrey, J., C. Higgins, B. Sivakumar, R. Groff, B. Hartman, J. Charbon- neau, J. Rooper, and B. Johnson. 2008. State-Specific LRFR Live Load Factors Using Weigh-in-Motion Data. Journal of Bridge Engi- neering, July/August, pp. 339–350. Pfister, J. F., and E. Hognestad. 1964. High-Strength Bars As Concrete Reinforcement, Part 6: Fatigue Tests. Journal of the Portland Cement Association Research and Development Laboratories, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 65–84. Portland Cement Association. 1970. Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks: A Cooperative Study, Final Report. Portland Cement Association (PCA), Skokie, Ill. Purvis, R. 2003. NCHRP Synthesis 319: Bridge Deck Joint Performance: A Synthesis of Highway Performance. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Rakoczy, P. 2011. WIM-Based Load Models for Bridge Serviceability Limit States. PhD dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Ramey, G., and R. Wright. 1994. Assessing and Enhancing the Durability/ Longevity Performances of Highway Bridges. Final report. HRC Research Project 2-13506. Highway Research Center, Auburn Uni- versity, Auburn, Ala. Ravindra, M., and T. Galambos. 1978. Load and Resistance Factor Design for Steel. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 104, No. 9, pp. 1337–1353. Roeder, C., K. Barth, and A. Bergman. 2002. NCHRP Web Document 46: Improved Live Load Deflection Criteria for Steel Bridges. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Rolfe, S., and J. Barsom. 1977. Fracture and Fatigue Control in Struc- tures: Applications of Fracture Mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Rostam, S. 2005. Design and Construction of Segmental Concrete Bridges for Service Life of 100 to 150 Years. American Segmental Bridge Institute, Buda, Tex. Samtani, N., A. Nowatzki, and D. Mertz. 2010. Selection of Spread Footings on Soils to Support Highway Bridge Structures. FHWA RC/TD-10-001. Federal Highway Administration Resource Center, Matteson, Ill. Samtani, N., and E. Nowatzki. 2006. Soils and Foundations: Volumes I and II. FHWA-NHI-06-088 and FHWA-NHI-06-089. Federal High- way Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Sargand, S., and T. Masada. 2006. Further Use of Spread Footing Founda- tions for Highway Bridges. State Job No. 14747(0), FHWA-OH-2006/8. Ohio Research Institute for Transportation and the Environment, Athens; Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus; and Office of Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Sargand, S., T. Masada, and R. Engle. 1999. Spread Footing Foundation for Highway Bridge Applications. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 5, pp. 373–382. Schilling, C., K. Klippstein, J. Barsom, and G. Blake. 1977. NCHRP Report 188: Fatigue of Welded Steel Bridge Members Under Variable- Amplitude Loadings. TRB, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C. Schmertmann, J., P. Brown, and J. Hartman. 1978. Improved Strain Influence Factor Diagrams. ASCE Journal of the Geotechnical Engi- neering Division, Vol. 104, No. 8, pp. 1131–1135. Schopen, D. 2010. Analyzing and Designing for Substructure Movement in Highway Bridges: An LRFD Approach. Master’s thesis. University of Delaware, Newark. Shahin, M., H. Maier, and M. Jaksa. 2002. Predicting Settlement of Shallow Foundations Using Neural Networks. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 9, pp. 785–793. Siriaksorn, A., and A. Naaman. 1980. Reliability of Partially Prestressed Beams at Serviceability Limit States. University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Ill. Sivakugan, N., and K. Johnson. 2002. Probabilistic Design Chart for Settlements of Shallow Foundations in Granular Soils. Australian Civil Engineering Transactions, No. 43, pp. 19–24. Sivakugan, N., and K. Johnson. 2004. Settlement Predictions in Gran- ular Soils: A Probabilistic Approach. Geotechnique, Vol. 54, No. 7, pp. 499–502. Sivakumar, B., M. Ghosn, and F. Moses. 2011. NCHRP Report 683: Protocols for Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Skempton, A., and D. MacDonald. 1956. Allowable Settlement of Buildings. Proceedings, Part III, Institution of Civil Engineers, No. 5, pp. 727–768. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 6th ed. 1953. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 11th ed. 1975. Includes 1974 and 1975 Interims. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington, D.C. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 15th ed. 1992. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Wash- ington, D.C. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th ed. 2002. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Wash- ington, D.C. Steel Bridge Bearing Selection and Design Guide. 1996. In Highway Struc- tures Design Handbook. American Iron and Steel Institute, National Steel Bridge Alliance, Washington, D.C., p. A-3. Steel Construction Manual, 14th ed. 2011. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill. Steel Design Guide 3: Serviceability Design Considerations for Steel Bridges, 2nd ed. 2003. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill. Structures Manual. 2013. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee. Stukhart, G., R. James, A. Garcia-Diaz, R. Bligh, J. Sobanjo, and W. McFarland. 1991. Study for a Comprehensive Bridge Management System for Texas. FHWA/TX-90/1212-1F. Texas Transportation Insti- tute, College Station, and Texas State Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Arlington. Tabatabai, H., A. Ghorbanpoor, and A. Turnquist-Nass. 2004. Reha- bilitation Techniques for Concrete Bridges. Project No. 0092-01-06. University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Madison. Tachau, H. 1971. Discussion of Fatigue Tests on Prestressed Concrete I-Beams. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 97, No. 9, pp. 2429–2431. Tadros, M., N. Al-Omaishi, S. Seguirant, and J. Gallt. 2003. NCHRP Report 496: Prestress Losses in Pretensioned High-Strength Concrete Bridge Girders. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Tan, C., and J. Duncan. 1991. Settlement of Footings on Sands: Accuracy and Reliability. Proc., Geotechnical Engineering Congress 1991, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 27, Vol. 1, pp. 446–455.

268 Technoslide. 2013. Bearings for Bridges and Structures. http://www .technoslide.com/pdf/elastomeric/elastomeric-plain-sliding-bearings- for-bridges-structures-brochure.pdf. Accessed Nov. 25. Thompson, P., and R. Shepard. 2000. AASHTO Commonly Recognized Bridge Elements: Successful Applications and Lessons Learned. National Workshop on Commonly Recognized Measures for Maintenance, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials, Washington, D.C. Vincent, G. 1969. Tentative Criteria for Load Factor Design of Steel High- way Bridges. Bulletin for the American Iron and Steel Institute, No. 15. Wahls, H. 1983. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 107: Shallow Foundations for Highway Structures. TRB, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C. Walker, W., and R. Wright. 1971. Criteria for the Deflection of Steel Bridges. Bulletin for the American Iron and Steel Institute, No. 19, pp. 1–75. Walraven, J., and A. Bicaj. 2011. The 2010 fib Model Code for Concrete Structures: A New Approach to Structural Engineering. Structural Concrete, Journal of the fib, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 139–147. Warner, R., and C. Hulsbos. 1966. Probable Fatigue Life of Prestressed Concrete Beams. Journal, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 16–39. Wikipedia. 2010. Deterioration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Deterioration. Accessed Nov. 25. Wikipedia. 2010. Serviceability (Structure). http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Serviceability_(structure). Accessed Nov. 25. Wiktionary. 2010. Maintenance. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ maintenance. Accessed Nov. 25. Wright, R., and W. Walker. 1972. Vibration and Deflection of Steel Bridges. Engineering Journal, American Institute of Steel Construction, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 20–31. Yura, J., T. Galambos, and M. Ravindra. 1978. The Bending Resistance of Steel Beams. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 104, No. 9, pp. 1355–1370. Zhang, L., and A. Ng. 2005. Probabilistic Limiting Tolerable Displace- ments for Serviceability Limit State Design of Foundations. Geotech- nique, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 151–161.

Next: Appendix A - SLS Requirements in the Eurocode »
Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design Get This Book
×
 Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Report S2-R19B-RW-1: Bridges for Service Life Beyond 100 Years: Service Limit State Design explores design codes critical for bridges to reach a service live of beyond 100 years.

The report also addresses performance measures and design procedures that utilize criteria to maximize the actual life of a bridge system.

The weigh-in-motion (WIM) data files used in SHRP 2 Renewal Project R19B are available. The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) WIM data is courtesy of the FHWA Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program.

Software Disclaimer: This software is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!