Integrating Tourism and Recreation Travel with Transportation Planning and Project Delivery (2004)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

32 REFERENCES “An Evaluation of the National Capital Regional Transpor- tation Planning Board’s Transportation and Community and System Preservation Pilot Program Grant,” Trans- Tech Management, Inc., Washington, D.C., Apr. 2001. Bangor to Trenton Transportation Alternatives Study, Phase I, Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, Dec. 2001. Cardone, V. and D. Myers, “Optimization of a Feeder Bus Service to Sandy Hook,” Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Wash- ington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003. Cross, G., “Travel Shenandoah: Lessons Learned in a Pub- lic/Private ATIS Partnership,” ITS America 10th Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings, Washington, D.C., 2000, 13 pp. Eck, R. and E.M. Wilson, “Transportation Needs of Na- tional Parks and Public Lands,” A5T55 Task Force Working Memo, Transportation Research Board, Na- tional Research Council, Washington, D.C., Fall 2001. Ecker, C., D. Krechmer, L. Grimm, D. Hodge, and F. Goetzke, Federal Lands Alternative Transportation Sys- tems (ATS) Study, Report FTA-TPL10-2000.1 and FHWA-EP-00-024, Prepared for the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administra- tion by Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 2001. Economic Development and the State Trunk Highway Sys- tem, Technical Report, Wisconsin Department of Trans- portation, Madison, Jan. 1998. Frechtling, D.C., M.D. Myer, and A.E. Pisarski, NCHRP Report 419: Tourism Travel and Transportation System Development, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, 72 pp. Humphrey, T.F., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 217: Consideration of the 15 Factors in the Metropoli- tan Planning Process, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, 55 pp. Implementation Strategies for the NH Route 16 Corridor Between Ossipee and Conway, NH, Lakes Regional Planning Commission, Meredith, N.H., July 2002, 16 pp. Kaczorowski, M.G., “Transportation Modeling for the 2002 Winter Olympic Games,” Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003. Mickelson, R.P., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 267: Transportation Development Process, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 1998, 48 pp. National Association of Regional Councils, Working To- gether on Transportation Planning: An Approach to Collaborative Decision-Making, FTA Policy Paper DC- 26-6013-95-1, Federal Transit Administration, Washing- ton, D.C., May 1995. “National Parks: Transportation Alternatives and Advanced Technology for the 21st Century,” Conference Proceed- ings, Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University–Bozeman, June 2–5, 1999. Okola, A., “Departure Time Choice for Recreational Ac- tivities by Elderly Nonworkers,” Transportation Re- search Record 1848, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 86–93. Olson, E.G. and M.W. Babcock, Economic Analysis of Scenic Byways in Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Ne- braska, final technical report, Midwest Transportation Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Nov. 1991. Peyrebrune, H.L., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 286: Multimodal Aspects of Statewide Transportation Planning, Transportation Research Board, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, 58 pp. Regional Transportation Connector Newsletter, Fall 2000, National Association of Development Organizations, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.nado. org/pubs/index.html. Regional Transportation Connector Newsletter, Oct.–Nov. 2001, National Association of Development Organiza- tions, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www. nado.org/pubs/index.html. Research Triangle Institute, National Personal Transporta- tion Survey, Federal Highway Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Federal Transit Administra- tion, and National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., 1995. Scenic Byway Development on the Oregon Coast— Economic Benefits and User Preferences, Dean Runyan Associates, Portland, Ore., 1990. Schaller, B., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 297: Building Effective Relationships Between Central Cities and Regional, State, and Federal Agencies, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 2001, 69 pp. Schuman, R. and L. Walden, 511 Case Studies: Kentucky, 2000 [Online]. Available: www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/511/ PDF/Kentucky.pdf. Sen, L. and S. Mayfield, “Accessible Tourism: Transporta- tion to and Accessibility of Historic Buildings and Other Recreational Areas in the City of Galveston, Texas,” Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transpor- tation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003. Smith, B.L., “Scenic Byways Data Needs, Resources, and Is- sues,” Transportation Research Record 1253, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1990, pp. 53–55.

33 Strouse, S., Holmes County Scenic Byways: The Value of Viewshed—Economics and Related Aspects of Signage, Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, 1999. Thompson, J., et al., Scenic Byways as a Rural Economic Development Strategy—The Development of a GIS Model of Tourism and Recreation in Montana, Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research, University of Montana, Missoula, 1995. “Tourism Transport Management,” TDM Encyclopedia, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Co- lumbia, Canada [Online]. Available: www.vtpi.org [Jan. 2002]. “Transportation Choices: 2025 Long-Range Plan Update,” New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, Mar. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.njchoices.com. Transportation Planning Guidebook, National Park Ser- vice, Washington, D.C., 2000 [Online]. Available: www. nps.gov/transportation/alt/guidebook. Turnbull, K., “Visitor Transportation at U.S. National Parks: Increasing Access but Preserving the Environ- ment,” TR News 210, Sept.–Oct. 2000, pp. 3–8 [Online]. Available: www.trb.org. Tyrrell, T. and M. Devitt, Valuing Changes in Scenic By- ways—VT Pilot Study, Consumer Behavior in Travel & Tourism, Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpe- lier, 2000. WTI Newsletter, Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University–Bozeman, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 2003. Walton, E. and R. Anderson, Identifying, Evaluating, and Preserving Minnesota’s Historic Roadside Facilities, Presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transpor- tation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2003.