National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Acronyms and Terms Used in This Report
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 90
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 91
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 92
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 93
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 94
Page 95
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24634.
×
Page 95

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

88 REFERENCES 8 80 cities, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://880cities.org/ [accessed May 15, 2015]. Abley, S., D. Smith, and S. Rendall, Development of the Aus- tralasian Pedestrian Facility Selection Tool, Austroads, Sydney, New South Wales, 2015, 92 pp. Bertulis, T. and D. Dulaski, “Driver Approach Speed and Its Impact on Driver Yielding to Pedestrian Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2464, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 46–51. Biton, A., D. Daddio, and J. Andrew, Statewide Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Handbook, Report FHWA- HEP-14-051, Office of Planning, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2014. Boodlal, L., et al., Factors Influencing Operating Speeds and Safety on Rural and Suburban Roads, Report FHWA- HRT-15-030, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., 2015, 376 pp. “Brattle Street Traffic Calming Project Evaluation,” Cambridge, Mass., 2012 [Online]. Available: http:// w w w.ca mbr id ge m a .gov / ~ / me d ia / Fi le s / CDD / Transportation/TrafficCalmingProjects/Brattle%20 St reet%20Traf f ic%20Calming%20Project%20 Evaluation20120815.pdf [accessed Aug. 3, 2015]. Carter, D.L., W.W. Hunter, C.V. Zegeer, J.R. Stewart, and H.F. Huang, Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices: Final Report, Report FHWA-HRT-06-125, Fed- eral Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Washington, D.C., 2006. Carter, D.L., W.W. Hunter, C.V. Zegeer, and J.R. Stewart, Pedestrian and Bicyclist Intersection Safety Indices: User Guide, Report FHWA-HRT-06-130, Federal High- way Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2007. Chen, L., C. Chen, R. Ewing, C.E. McKnight, R. Srinivasan, and M. Row, “Safety Countermeasures and Crash Reduc- tion in New York City—Experience and Lessons Learned,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 312–322. Chen, L., C. Chen, and R. Ewing, “The Relative Effective- ness of Signal Related Pedestrian Countermeasures at Urban Intersections—Lessons from a New York City Case Study,” Transport Policy, Vol. 32, 2014, pp. 69–78. Chu, X. and M. Baltes, “Measuring Pedestrian Quality of Service for Midblock Street Crossings: Selection of Potential Determinants,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1828, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 89–97. City of Cambridge, Community Development Department, Cambridge Traffic Calming Program, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.cambridgema.gov/~/media/Files/ CDD /Transpor t a t ion /Traf f icCalm ing / t rca lm _ brochure_2000.pdf [accessed Aug. 3, 2015]. City of Cambridge, Community Development Department, Traffic Calming Program, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.cambridgema.gov/CDD/Transportation/ projects/trafficcalmingprogram [accessed Aug. 3, 2015]. City of Cambridge Five Year Sidewalk and Street Recon- struction Plan, May 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www. cambr idgema.gov/~ /media /Files /publicworksde partment/Engineering/20150501FiveYearPlanPowerpo int.pdf [accessed Aug. 3, 2015] City of New York, Vision Zero Action Plan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.nyc.gov/html/visionzero/assets/ downloads /pdf /nyc-vision-zero-act ion-plan.pdf [accessed July 20, 2015]. CMF ID 586 Details: “Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., 2004,” Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.cfm?facid=586 [accessed June 8, 2010]. CMF ID 587 Details: “Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., 2004,” Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.cfm?facid=587 [accessed June 8, 2010]. CMF ID 588 Details: “Handbook of Road Safety Measures, Elvik, R. and Vaa, T., 2004,” Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.cfm?facid=588 [accessed June 8, 2010]. Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, Federal High- way Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. cmfclearinghouse.org/ [accessed Aug. 15, 2015]. Design Resource Index, Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Chapel Hill, N.C., May 14, 2015 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/planning/facilities_ designresourceindex.cfm [accessed Aug. 24, 2015]. Engineering Speed Management Countermeasures: A Desk- top Reference of Potential Effectiveness in Reducing

89 Speed, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., July 2014 [Online]. Available: http://safety.fhwa. dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/eng_count/2014/reducing_ speed.cfm [accessed Aug. 4, 2015]. Environmental Justice—2014 Implementation Report, Fed- eral Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., updated Feb. 23, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot. gov/environment /environmental_ just ice /ej_at_ dot/2014_implementation_report/index.cfm [accessed June 10, 2015]. Fayish, A. and F. Gross, “Safety Effectiveness of Leading Pedestrian Intervals Evaluated by a Before-After Study with Comparison Groups,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2198, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 15–22. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP), Bicycle and Pedestrian Program, Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach, 2012a [Online]. Available: ht tp: //www.f hwa.dot.gov/environment /bicycle_ pedestrian/guidance/design.cfm [accessed Sept. 6, 2015]. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning, Envi- ronment, & Realty (HEP), Bicycle and Pedestrian Pro- gram, Memorandum, 2012b [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ guidance/supdesgn.cfm [accessed Sept. 6, 2015]. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP), Bicycle and Pedestrian Program, United States Department of Transportation Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/policy_ accom.cfm [accessed Sept. 6, 2015]. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, A Sys- temic Approach to Safety—Using Risk to Drive Action, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/sys- temic/ [accessed Aug. 21, 2015]. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, Proven Safety Countermeasures, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://safety.f hwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/ [accessed Aug. 20, 2015]. Fischer, E., et al., International Scan Summary Report on Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility, FHWA International Technology Scanning Program, Washing- ton, D.C., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/overview/ pbssummary062409.pdf [accessed May 15, 2015]. Fitzpatrick, K., P. Carlson, M.A. Brewer, M.D. Wooldridge, and S.P. Miaou, NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices, Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2003. Fitzpatrick, K., et al., TCRP Report 112/NCHRP Report 562: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2006a, 109 pp. Fitzpatrick, K., et al., TCRP Web Document 30/NCHRP Web Document 91: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignal- ized Crossings: Appendices B to O, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006b, 270 pp. Fitzpatrick, K. and E.S. Park, CMF I.D. 2922 Details: Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treat- ment, Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, 2010a [Online]. Available: http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/ detail.cfm?facid=2922 [accessed June 6, 2010]. Fitzpatrick, K. and E.S. Park, Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment, Report FHWAHRT-10-042, Office of Safety Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., 2010b, 76 pp. Fitzpatrick, K., S. Chrysler, R. Van Houten, W. Hunter, and S. Turner, Evaluation of Pedestrian and Bicycle Engi- neering Countermeasures: Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons, HAWKs, Sharrows, Crosswalk Markings, and the Development of an Evaluation Methods Report, Report FHWA-HRT-11-039, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, McLean, Va., 2011, 65 pp. Fitzpatrick, K., M. Brewer, and R. Avelar, “Driving Yielding at Traffic Control Signals, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons, and Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons in Texas,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 2463, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 46–54. Fitzpatrick, K., J. Warner, M.A. Brewer, B.L. Bentzen, J.M. Barlow, and B. Sperry, TCRP Report 175: Guidebook on Pedestrian Crossings of Public Transit Rail Services, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2015. “[Five] 5 Year Sidewalk and Street Reconstruction Plan,” Cambridge Department of Public Works, May 1, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.cambridgema.gov/~/ media/Files/publicworksdepartment/Engineering/20150 501FiveYearPlanPowerpoint.pdf [accessed Aug. 3, 2015]. Forbes, G., T. Gardner, H. McGee, and R. Srinivasan, Meth- ods and Practices for Setting Speed Limits: An Informa- tional Report, Report FHWA-SA-12-004, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012, 107 pp. [Online]. Available: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ speedmgt/ref_mats/f hwasa12004/f hwasa12004.pdf [accessed Aug. 4, 2015].

90 Foster, N., C.M. Monsere, and K. Carlos, “Evaluating Driver and Pedestrian Behaviors at Enhanced Multi-lane Mid- block Pedestrian Crossings: A Case Study in Portland, OR 4,” Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Paper No. 14-2893, 2014. Gårder, P., “The Impact of Speed and Other Variables on Pedestrian Safety in Maine,” Accident Analysis & Pre- vention, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 533–542. Goodwin, A., L. Thomas, B. Kirley, B.W. Hall, N. O’Brien, and K. Hill, Countermeasures That Work: A Highway Safety Countermeasure Guide for State Highway Safety Offices, 8th ed., Report DOT HS 812 202, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015, 437 pp. Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2004, 127 pp. Harkey, D.L., S. Tsai, L. Thomas, and W.W. Hunter, Pedes- trian & Bicycle Crash Analysis Tool (PBCAT): Version 2.0 Application Manual, Report FHWA-HRT-06-089, Office of Safety Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., 2006, 241 pp. Software FHWA-HRT-06-091 [Online]. Available: http://www.walkinginfo.org/facts/pbcat/index.cfm. Harkey, D.L., D.L. Carter, J.M. Barlow, and B.L. Bentzen. NCHRP Web-Only Document 117A: Accessible Pedestrian Signals: A Guide to Best Practices, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ nchrp/nchrp_w117a.pdf [accessed Aug. 4, 2015]. Harwood, D.W., NCHRP Report 330: Effective Utilization of Street Width on Urban Arterials, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, 55 pp. Hefferan, J., M. Hoyt, and P. Lagerwey, Improvement Plan for Uncontrolled Marked Crosswalks, City of Seattle, Seattle Department of Transportation, Pedestrian Pro- gram, 2002. Hefferan, J.R. and P. Lagerwey, “The City of Seattle, WA, USA, Crosswalk Inventory and Improvement Plan,” ITE Journal, Vol. 74, Jan. 2004. pp. 42–46. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. Highway Capacity Manual 2010, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010–2014 [Online]. Available: http://hcm.trb.org/?qr=1 [accessed Aug. 30, 2015]. Highway Safety Manual, 1st ed., Vols. 1, 2, and 3, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offi- cials, Washington, D.C., 2010. Hua, J., N. Gutierrez, I. Banerjee, F. Markowitz, and D.R. Ragland, San Francisco PedSafe II Project Outcomes and Lessons Learned, Safe Transportation Research & Education Center, 2009. Huang, H., C. Zegeer, R. Nassi, and B. Fairfax, The Effects of Innovative Pedestrian Signs at Unsignalized Loca- tions: A Tale of Three Treatments, Report FHWA- RD-00-098, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., 2000, 31 pp. Hubbard, S.M.L., D.M. Bullock, and J.H. Thai, “Trial Imple- mentation of a Leading Pedestrian Interval: Lessons Learned, ITE Journal, Vol. 78, No. 10, 2008, pp. 32–41. Hunter-Zaworski, K. and J. Mueller, Evaluation of Alterna- tive Pedestrian Traffic Control Devices, Final Report SPR 721, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, and Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012, 125 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.oregon. gov/odot/td/tp_res/docs/reports/2012/spr721pedreport. pdf [accessed June 17, 2015]. King, M.R., “Calming New York City Intersections,” Trans- portation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Sym- posium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, Tex., June 28–30, 1999, I-3/ pp. 1–15. Knapp, K., B. Chandler, J. Atkinson, T. Welch, H. Rigdon, R. Retting, S. Meekins, E. Widstrand, and R.J. Porter, Road Diet Informational Guide, Report FHWA- SA-14-028, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, Washington, D.C., 2014, 72 pp. [Online]. Avail- able: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_diets/info_guide/ [accessed June 11, 2015]. Kronenberg, C., L. Woodward, B. DuBose, and D. Weissman, “Achieving Vision Zero: A Data-Driven Investment Strat- egy for Eliminating Pedestrian Fatalities on a Citywide Level,” Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Paper No. 15-4847, 2015. Ladders of Opportunity, Transportation.gov, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, n.d. [Online]. Available: https:// www.transportation.gov/opportunity [accessed June 10, 2015]. Lagerwey, P.A., M.J. Hintze, J.B. Elliott, J. L. Toole, and R.J. Schneider, NCHRP Report 803: Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Along Existing Roads—ActiveTrans Pri- ority Tool Guidebook, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015. Leaf, W.A. and D.F. Preusser, Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries, Report DOT HS 809 021, National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., 1999 [Online]. Available: http:// www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people /injury/research /pub / HS809012.html [accessed Aug. 3, 2015].

91 Malenfant, L. and R. Van Houten, “Increasing the Percent- age of Drivers Yielding to Pedestrians in Three Canadian Cities with a Multifaceted Safety Program,” Health Edu- cation Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1990, pp. 275–279. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C., 2009, rev. 2012. Map 21—Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century, Office of Policy and Governmental Affairs, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transpor- tation, July 17, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/MAP21/summaryinfo.cfm [accessed May 15, 2015]. McGrane, A. and M. Mitman, “An Overview and Recommendations of High-Visibility Crosswalk Marking Styles,” PBIC White Paper Series, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/dow nloads/ PBIC_WhitePaper_Crosswalks.pdf [accessed May 12, 2015]. Mead, J., C. Zegeer, and M. Bushell, Evaluation of Pedestrian-Related Roadway Measures: A Summary of Available Research, Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Chapel Hill, N.C., 2014 [Online]. Available: h t t p : / /w w w.pedbi ke i n fo.org /cm s /dow n load s / PedestrianLitReview_April2014.pdf. Mitman, M.F. and M.D. Ridgway, Recommended Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicycles at Interchanges: An ITE Recommended Practice, Pub. RP-039, Available from Institute of Transportation Engineers [http:// www.ite.org/], Washington, D.C., 2015, 30 pp. Mountain, L.J., W.M. Hirst, and M.J. Maher, “Are Speed Enforcement Cameras More Effective Than Other Speed Management Measures? The Impact of Speed Manage- ment Schemes on 30 mph Roads,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005, pp. 742–754. Nabors, D., M. Gibbs, L. Sandt, S. Rocchi, E. Wilson, and M. Lipinski, Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Guidelines and Prompt Lists, Report FHWA-SA-07-007, Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C., 2007. National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), About NACTO, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://nacto.org/about/ [accessed June 8, 2015]. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide: Oregon Highway Design Manual, Appendix L., Oregon Depart- ment of Transportation, 2011. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Designing for Pedestrian Safety (course), n.d. (unpublished material). Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, et al., Safe Routes to School Guide, 2015 [Online]. Available: http:// guide.saferoutesinfo.org/ [accessed Aug. 4, 2015]. Pedestrian Crossing: 50 State Summary, National Confer- ence of State Legislatures, April 20, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/ pedestrian-crossing-50-state-summary.aspx [accessed Aug. 22, 2015]. Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines, City of Boulder Transportation Division, Boulder, Colo., 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www-static.bouldercolorado. gov/docs/pedestrian-crossing-treamtment-installation- guidelines-1-201307011719.pdf [accessed Feb. 7, 2015]. Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled Locations, Minnesota Local Road Research Board, St. Paul, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.mnltap.umn.edu/publications/ handbooks /pedcrossingguide /documents /ped _ guidebook.pdf [accessed June 29, 2015]. Petritsch, T., The Truth About Lane Widths: The Influence of Lane Widths on Safety and Capacity: A Summary of the Latest Findings, Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, Chapel Hill, N.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: http:// www.pedbikeinfo.org/data/library/details.cfm?id=4348 [accessed Aug. 3, 2015]. Proven Safety Countermeasures, Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, Report FHWA-SA-12-012, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Oct. 15, 2014 [Online]. Available: http:// safety.f hwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures/f hwa_ sa_12_012.cfm [accessed June 15, 2015]. Redmon, T., “Looking Out for Pedestrians,” Public Roads, Vol. 69, No. 3, Nov./Dec. 2005 [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/05nov/03. cfm [accessed Aug. 2015]. Rosén, E. and U. Sander, “Pedestrian Fatality Risk as a Function of Car Impact Speed,” Accident Analysis & Pre- vention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 536–542. Rural Transportation Safety: A Summary of Useful Practices, J.D. Thorpe, Ed., University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Center for Excellence in Rural Safety, 2012, 40 pp. [Online]. http://www.ruralsafety.umn.edu/research/documents/ ruraltransportationsafety.pdf [accessed July 1, 2015]. Sandt, L., L. Thomas, K. Langford, and D. Nabors, A Resi- dent’s Guide for Creating Safer Communities for Walk- ing and Biking, Report FHWA-SA-14-099, Office of Safety, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015. Santos, A., N. McGuckin, H.Y. Nakamoto, D. Gray, and S. Liss, Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National House- hold Travel Survey, Report FHWA-PL-11-022, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011, 82 pp. [Online]. Available: http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt. pdf [accessed June 25, 2015]. Schroeder, B.J., S.W. Worth, and D.J. Findley, North Caro- lina Pedestrian Crossing Guidance, Report FHWA/

92 NC/2014-15, North Carolina Department of Transporta- tion, Raleigh, July 2015, 79 pp. Shepherd, G.M., W.C. Waidelich, Jr., J.A. Lindley, and T.T. Furst, Memorandum, Subject: Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Flexibility, Aug. 20, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/design_guidance/design_ flexibility.cfm [accessed May 15, 2015]. Shurbutt, J. and R. Van Houten, Effects of Yellow Rectangu- lar Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks, Report FHWA-HRT-10-043, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., 2010. Smart Growth America, National Complete Streets Coalition, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.smartgrowthamerica. org/complete-streets [accessed Sept. 15, 2015]. Sundstrom, C., et al., BikeSafe 2014: Bicycle Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.pedbikesafe.org/bikesafe/authors. cfm [accessed Sep. 14, 2015]. Tefft, B.C., Impact Speed and a Pedestrian’s Risk of Severe Injury or Death, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C., 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www. aaafoundation.org/pdf/2011PedestrianRiskVsSpeed.pdf [accessed Feb. 3, 2016]. Thomas, L., Safety Effects of In-Roadway Warning Lights or “Flashing Crosswalk” Treatment: A Review and Synthe- sis of Research, Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Cen- ter and FHWA, Chapel Hill, N.C., 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/downloads/ FlashingCrosswalksReview_Thomas.pdf. Thomas, L., Road Diet Conversions: A Synthesis of Safety Research,” Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center: White Paper Series and FHWA, Chapel Hill, N.C., May 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/ cms/downloads/WhitePaper_RoadDiets_PBIC.pdf [accessed April 20, 2015]. Thomas, L., P. Ryus, C. Semler, N.J. Thirsk, K. Krizek, and C. Zegeer, Delivering Safe, Comfortable, and Connected Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks: A Review of Interna- tional Practices, Report FHWA-15-051, Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015a, 67 pp. Thomas, L., R. Srinivasan, M. Worth, M. Parker, and R. Miller, Jurisdiction Speed Management Action Plan Development Package, Report FHWA-SA-15-017, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015b [Online]. Available: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ ref_mats/ [accessed Aug. 3, 2016]. Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness for Pedestrian Crashes, Report FHWA-SA-014, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/ collateral/PSAP%20Training/gettraining_references_ pedToolboxofCountermeasures2013.pdf. Toole Design Group, District of Columbia Pedestrian Mas- ter Plan, District of Columbia Department of Transporta- tion, Washington, D.C., 2009 [Online]. Available: http:// ddot.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ddot/publication/ attachments/pedestrianmasterplan_2009.pdf. Toward Zero Deaths, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Mar. 27, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ tzd/ [accessed June 11, 2015]. Toward Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety, n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.towardzerodeaths. org/strategy/ [accessed June 11, 2015]. Traffic Calming Request Form, Cambridge, Mass., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.cambridgema.gov/~/ media/Files/CDD/Transportation/TrafficCalming/ trcalm_form_request.pdf. United States Access Board, Proposed Guidelines for Pedes- trian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, n.d. [Online] Available: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and- standards /streets-sidewalks /public-rights-of-way/ proposed-rights-of-way-guidelines [accessed June 8, 2015]. Urban Street Design Guide, National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York, N.Y., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://nacto.org/publication/urban-street- design-guide/ [accessed Aug. 1, 2015]. U.S. Department of Transportation, Environmental Review Toolkit, Program Overview, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., n.d. [Online]. Available: https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/integ/index.asp [accessed May 15, 2015]. Van Houten, R., “The Effects of Advance Stop Lines and Sign Prompts on Pedestrian Safety in a Crosswalk on a Multilane Highway,” Journal of Applied Behavior Analy- sis, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1998, pp. 245–251. Van Houten, R. and L. Malenfant, “The Influence of Signs Prompting Motorists to Yield Before Marked Crosswalks on Motor Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts at Crosswalks with Flashing Amber,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1992, pp. 217–225. Van Houten, R., J. Malenfant, and D. McCusker, “Advance Yield Markings: Reducing Motor Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflicts at Multilane Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approach,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1773, Transpor- tation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 69–74.

93 Van Houten, R., D. McCusker, S. Huybers, J. Malenfant, and D. Rice-Smith, “Advance Yield Markings and Fluo- rescent Yellow-Green RA 4 Signs at Crosswalks with Uncontrolled Approaches,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1818, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 119–124. Vision Zero Network, Vision Zero Cities Map, updated April 2016 [Online]. Available: http:// visionzeronetwork.org/ resources/vision-zero-cities [accessed July 6, 2016]. Walsh, R., NCHRP Synthesis 436: Local Policies and Prac- tices That Support Safe Pedestrian Environments, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, 93 pp. “Windsor Street Traffic Calming Project Evaluation,” Cambridge, Mass., n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www. cambridgema.gov/~/media/Files/CDD/Transportation/ TrafficCalming/Windsor_Street_Evaluation_20130225. pdf [accessed Aug 3, 2015]. Zegeer, C.V., et al., NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Imple- mentation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 10: A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involv- ing Pedestrians, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, 150 pp. Zegeer, C.V., J.R. Stewart, H.H. Huang, P.A. Lagerwey, J. Feaganes, and B.J. Campbell, Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Loca- tions: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines, Report FHWA-HRT-04-100, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, McLean, Va., 2005, 112 pp. Zegeer, C.V., et al., How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan, Report FHWA-SA-05-12, Federal Highway Administration and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2006, revised 2009. Zegeer, C.V., et al., PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasures Selection System, Aug. 2013 [Online] Available: http://pedbikesafe.org/PEDSAFE/index.cfm.

Next: BIBLIOGRAPHY »
Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways Get This Book
×
 Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's NCHRP Synthesis 498: Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways compiles information on the state of existing practices regarding application of pedestrian crossing improvements, and does not produce new guidance. The report includes a survey of state departments of transportation (DOTs) and local transportation agencies, a synthesis of current recommended practice and policy guidance, and a literature review of safety evidence for more than 25 pedestrian crossing treatments.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!