Post-Extreme Event Damage Assessment and Response for Highway Bridges (2016)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

58 REFERENCES PROVIDED BY STATES Alabama: – Jennifer Butler, Alabama DOT (2014); PowerPoint: I-65 Delta Bridge Emergency Repairs [Online]. Available: h t tp : / /a ldotapps .dot .s ta te .a l .us /CEME/2014- Presentations/6/I-65%20Bridge%20Emergency%20 Repair%20Project%20(Jennifer%20Butler).pdf. Alaska: – Alaska DOT; Field Operation Guide – Shannon McCarthy; Alaska DOT&PF (2003); Respond- ing to an Earthquake, Vol. 67, No. 3 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/ 03nov/05.cfm. – Alaska DOT; Field Operation Guide: Section 3, Incident Assessment California: – Office of Infrastructure (2013); Emergency Relief Manual; DOI [Online]. Available: http://dot.ca.gov/ hq/Local Programs/erp/ERmanual-2013-05-31.pdf. – James D. Cooper, Ian M. Fiedland, Ian G. Buckle, Ronald B. Nimis, and Nancy McMullin Bobb (2014); The Northridge Earthquake: Progress Made, Lessons Learned in Seismic-Resistant Bridge Design; Vol. 58, No. 1; DOI [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot. gov/publications/publicroads/94summer/p94su26.cfm. Colorado: – Colorado DOT (2014); US 34A Loveland and Estes Park Damage Assessment Report; Larimer County, Colo. – Richard Osmun (2013); September 2013 Storm Damage Wall Analysis Report – Shannon & Wilson Inc. (2013); Nondestructive Subgrade Void Investigation; Denver, Colo. Connecticut: – Connecticut DOT; Plan of Action for Scour Critical Bridges – Connecticut DOT (2005); Scour Event Response Flowchart Florida: – Florida DOT, Office of Emergency Management (2013); The Mathews Bridge Impact Emergency Response Story – Florida DOT (2011); Emergency Management Program; Topic No. 956-030-001-f – Florida DOT; Forms and Procedures; Procedure Number: 850-010-030, Section 3.8.3. Illinois: – Illinois DOT; Earthquake Response Assessment of Highways and Bridges – http://www.idot.illinois.gov/assets/uploads/files/doing- business/manuals-guides-&-handbooks/highways/ bridges/inspection/structural%20services%20manual% 202013.pdf. Indiana: – Julio A. Ramirez, Robert J. Frosch, Mete A. Sozen, and A. Murat Turk; School of Engineering, Purdue University, Indiana DOT (2000); Field Guide for the Post- Earthquake Safety Evaluation of Bridges and Roads. – Lyle Sadler, Indiana DOT (2012); INDOT Assessment & Route Clearance in Support of Emergency Response. Iowa: – HDR, Iowa DOT (2014); Emergency Response Manual for Over Height Collisions to Bridges [Online]. Avail- able: https://siims.iowadot.gov/IowaDOT_Emergency ResponseManualForBridges.pdf. – HDR, Iowa DOT (2014); Bridge Inspection Manual [Online]. Available: https://siims.iowadot.gov/IowaDOT_ BridgeInspectionManual_01JAN2014_FINAL.pdf. Kentucky: – Explore Kentucky Lake (2012); Eggners Ferry Bridge Collapse [Online]. Available: https://www.explore kentuckylake.com/eggners/eggners_ferry_bridge_ collapse2.htm. Louisiana: – Office of Infrastructure (2013); Emergency Relief Manual [Online]. Available: http://dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/ erp/ERmanual-2013-05-31.pdf. – Paul Fossier, Louisiana DOT (2005); PowerPoint: Post Hurricane Katrina Bridge Issues – http://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/pubs_final_reports_5.html. Minnesota: – Minnesota DOT (2013); State Aid Emergency Relief (ER) Procedures [Online]. Available: http://www.dot. state.mn.us/stateaid/disaster/State%20Aid%20Emer- gency%20Relief%20Procedures%20July%202013%20 Update.pdf. – U.S.DOT, Federal Highway Administration (2013); Emergency Relief Manual [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/erm/. – National Transportation Safety Board (2008); Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge; Accident Report: NTSB/ HAR-08/03 PB2008-916203; Minneapolis, Minnesota [Online]. Available: http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/ AccidentReports/Reports/HAR0803.pdf. – Catherine E.W. French, University of Minnesota (2014); Modeling and Monitoring the Long-Term Behavior of Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/research/TS/2014/201439. pdf. – University of Minnesota; Development of an Advanced Structural Monitoring System for Fracture Critical Steel Bridges; Project 00019759. – Minnesota DOT (2013); MnDOT Notice Regarding the Cedar Avenue Bridge Monitoring Project. – Minnesota DOT (2009); Bridge Scour Evaluation Pro- cedure for Minnesota Bridges [Online]. Available: http:// www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/pdf/hydraulics/Scour- Guidelines_12-09.pdf.

59 – Bridge Office, Minnesota DOT (2012); Trunk High- way Bridge Response Plan [Online]. Available: http:// www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/pdf/hydraulics/Bridge OfficeFloodResponsePlan.pdf. – Bridge Scour Plan of Action [Online]. Available: http:// www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/pdf/hydraulics/Scour Guidelines_12-09.pdf. – Bridge Office Trunk Highway Bridge Flood Response Plan [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/ bridge/pdf/hydraulics/BridgeOfficeFloodResponse Plan.pdf. – Scour Monitoring Technology Implementation [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/research/TS/2014/ 201437.pdf. Mississippi: – Mississippi DOT; Bridge Structural Damage Response Plan Missouri: – Missouri DOT (2011); Missouri Incident Response Plan – Don Hillis, Missouri DOT; MoDOT Incident and Emer- gency Management [Online]. Available: http://www. ce.siue.edu/faculty/hzhou/Information%20CD/ Menu%20Files/Materials/15-MoDOT%20Incident%20 and%20Emergency%20Management.pdf. Montana: – Montana DOT (2014); Bailey Bridge Construction: Fish Creek—South of Ryegate; Report Number: S00300001+02001. – Montana DOT; Structure Maintenance Program; DOT [Online]. Available: http://www.mdt.mt.gov/ publications/docs/manuals/mmanual/chapt10c.pdf. – Montana DOT (2014); Maintenance Action Report— Fish Creek Bridge—S00300002+02001—80 ft SSR Bailey Bridge Erection Summary and Timeline. New York City: – New York City Office of Emergency Management; [Online]. Available: http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/ html/home/home.shtml. – New York City DOT; Needs for and Capabilities of Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation (NDT&E). New York State: – Jerome S. O’Connor, University of Buffalo (2010); Post- Earthquake Bridge Inspection Guidelines; Project Num- ber: C-06-14 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.ny.gov/ divisions/engineering/technical-services/trans-r-and- d-repository/C-06-14_Post-Eq%20Final%20Report_ October%202010.pdf. – New York State DOT (2003); Bridge Safety Assur- ance Hydraulic Vulnerability Manual [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/ structures/repository/manuals/bridge_safety/bsa_hyd_ vuln_manual.pdf. Ohio: – Ohio DOT (2015); Engineer’s Report Bridge No. LOR- 20-9.99. – Ohio DOT (2014); Over Height Collision Report; Report Number: 27-0656-27. Oklahoma: – Oklahoma DOT (2015); ODOT Refining Department’s Post-Earthquake Response Guidelines [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.ok.gov/odot/Earthquakes.html. – Oklahoma DOT (2002); Emergency Recovery Project and Demolition Project for Bridge No. 6822-0000 X, NBI 17051 [Online]. Available: http://www.okladot.state.ok. us/newsmedia/i40bridge/pdfs/I-40_Commission_Mtg_ Item.pdf. – U.S.DOT, Federal Highway Administration (2002); Accelerated Bridge Repairs: Meeting the Challenge in Oklahoma [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot. gov/publications/focus/02aug/01.cfm. Oregon: – Oregon DOT; Emergency Operations Plan: Concept of Operations – Michael J. Koob, Oregon DOT (2013); E-mail to Dr. Steven Lovejoy: John Day River Bridge Tack Weld Removal – Oregon DOT; Emergency Operations Plan: Bridge Damage Assessment Pennsylvania: – Pennsylvania DOT (2011); PowerPoint: Hurricane Irene August 27th–28th: North Central PA Flood Damage to Bridges – Pennsylvania DOT (2011); PowerPoint: Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges During Floods – Pennsylvania DOT; PowerPoint: SR 3001 Damage Photos – Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center (2011); Wed Sep 7, 2011 NOAA National Weather Service – Pennsylvania DOT (2010); Bridge Safety Inspection Man- ual [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/ PubsForms/Publications/PUB%20238.pdf. Tennessee: – Illinois DOT; Earthquake Response Assessment of High- ways and Bridges – Julio A. Ramirez, Robert J. Frosch, Mete A. Sozen, and A. Murat Turk; School of Engineering, Purdue Uni- versity, Indiana DOT (2000); Field Guide for the Post- Earthquake Safety Evaluation of Bridges and Roads – Tennessee DOT (2014); Bridge Inspection Program Procedures Manual [Online]. Available: http://survey gizmoresponseuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/fileuploads/ 64484/2168651/218-4c468817c96e918535cf9010719 ac104_Procedures Manual_revised_2014.pdf. – Terry D. Leatherwood (2010); Superflood! [Online]. Available: http://surveygizmoresponseuploads.s3. amazonaws.com/fileuploads/64484/2168651/218-d90 680b410c9135fcf24578d539fde17_2010+Superflood+ Presentation.pdf. Texas: – C. Eugene Buth, William F. Williams, Michael S. Brackin, Dominique Lord, Srinivas R. Geedipally, and Akram Y. Abu-Odeh; Analysis of Large Truck Colli- sions with Bridge Piers: Phase 1. Report of Guidelines

60 for Designing Bridge Piers and Abutment for Vehicle Collisions; Report Number: 9-4973-1; Texas Trans- portation Institute; College Station, Texas [Online]. Available: http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu. edu/documents/9-4973-1.pdf. – The Associated Press (2001); Queen Isabella Cause- way Reconstruction Beginning [Online]. Available: http://amarillo.com/stories/2001/09/27/tex_queen. shtml#.VY28xvlVhBd. Vermont: – Nick Wark, Kelly Smith, Matthew Kennedy, Sarah Widing, Jacob San Antonio, and Robert Wildey, Vermont Agency of Transportation (2015); Hydraulics Manual [Online]. Available: http://vtransengineering.vermont.gov/sites/ aot_program_development/files/documents/structures/ VTrans%20Hydraulics%20Manual.pdf. Virginia: – U.S.DOT, Federal Highway Administration: Plan of Action for Scour Critical Bridges [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/ scourtech/scour.cfm. – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0961002-0000000019218 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0966023-0000000019236 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0506012-0000000026315 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0496067-000000000010616 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0481015-00000000010553 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0966033-00000000023309 – Virginia DOT (2011); Structure Inspection Report; Agency ID: 0966026-00000000019238 Washington: – Washington DOT (2015); Bridge Inspection Man- ual [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/ Publications/Manuals/M36-64.htm. – National Transportation Safety Board (2013); Collapse of the Interstate 5 Skagit River Bridge Following a Strike by an Oversized Combination Vehicle; Accident Report: NTSB/HAR-14/01 BP2014-106399; Mount Vernon, Washington [Online]. Available: http://www.ntsb.gov/ investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1401.pdf. – Washington DOT (2014); I-5—Skagit River Bridge Replacement—Completed July 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/i5/skagitriverbridge replacement/. – Washington DOT (2013); Video: I-5—Skagit River Bridge Replacement New Bridge Segment Slides into Place [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=o5uXnSREbH0&feature=c4-overview&list=UUm Wr7UYgRp4v_HvRfEgquXg. Wyoming: – Wyoming DOT (2011); Field Guide for Bridge High- Flow Monitoring and Emergency Procedures – Wyoming DOT (2010); Fremont County Flooding, June 2010, Bridge Inspection Summary – Wyoming DOT (2014); Damage Inspection Report; Proj- ect: DR22888, Bridge Over Interstate 25, ML28003B at RM 256.94, District 2, Structure ACH – Wyoming DOT (2014); Structure Damage Repair Report; Project: DR22888, Nimmo Road Interchange, Laramie County