National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Dissemination of Outputs
Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×

7

Key Findings and Recommendations

REACTOR

The nuclear reactor on which the NCNR depends is 50 years old, and as a matter of simple prudence, a plan needs to be developed that will ensure that NCNR users have the neutrons they need into the indefinite future. In June 2017, the NCNR issued a report describing the results of a brief study of the following available options: (1) continued operation of the existing reactor, (2) upgrade of that reactor, and (3) its complete replacement. This report needs to be updated and a much more detailed plan developed. Options 1 and 2 are inferior to Option 3. The NCNR report indicated that Option 3 is likely to cost about $1 billion and take more than 15 years to complete. A project of this magnitude will not be undertaken without a substantial planning effort and support from the neutron and the general scientific communities. An advantage of building a new reactor is that the current reactor could continue running, and thus serve the user community, while the new reactor is being built. If Option 1 were to be pursued, the United States will become increasingly noncompetitive internationally. If Option 2 were chosen, user services will be interrupted for at least 2 years, risking permanent loss of the user community.

The reactor is 50 years old. Loss of this facility would have a strongly negative impact on neutron science within the United States and the scientific disciplines that CNR serves.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR should commission a detailed assessment of the current facility and begin the conceptual design of a new reactor. NCNR would do well to elaborate a systematic succession plan in concert with NIST leadership.

OPERATION

While external reviews of the NCNR that are conducted less frequently than annually have been and continue to be useful, they do not provide sufficiently current or detailed evaluations and tracking of the center’s technical and operational issues. In particular, there is no apparent formal, regular assessment connecting the NCNR to NIST overall and to the NIST Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (VCAT) in particular. External reviews of the NCNR consisting of scientists and managers familiar with the international neutron communities and landscape, need to be conducted annually. Their annual reports to the NCNR director and to the cognizant NIST Director would be beneficial. Such annual reviews are especially needed at this time in view of the major strategic issues facing the NCNR in the execution of its strategic objectives:

Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×

External reviews conducted less frequently than annually are not able to provide sufficiently current or detailed evaluations of the NCNR nor to track its technical and operational issues.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR should establish external reviews that assess its technical and operational issues on an annual basis.

The NCNR plays a critical role in both fundamental and applied industrial research within the United States but does not currently have representation on the NIST VCAT.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR leadership should work with NIST leadership to address the absence of VCAT representation in neutron applications.

The panel was not provided with a document that clearly articulates the NCNR’s vision, mission, and strategic plan complete with contingencies.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR should prepare a guiding document on vision, mission, and strategic plans and update it regularly.

The United States significantly lags behind the European Union in neutron-scattering facilities, and it is in jeopardy of becoming internationally noncompetitive. The NCNR represents a large fraction of the neutron scattering capability within the United States, and it remains a world-class facility, even though its funding has been stagnant in recent years. Continuation of current funding trends inevitably leads to a trajectory of decline.

RECOMMENDATION: NCNR leadership should work with NIST leadership to ensure the support of the NCNR at a level of resourcing that will enable it to develop and support world-class neutron scattering instrumentation.

nSoft

nSoft is an industrial consortium, unique among neutron scattering user facilities, designed specifically to engage industry in neutron scattering. It embodies an innovative strategy for getting U.S. industries involved in neutron science by making it easy for industrial users to realize benefits that neutron scattering can provide to their research programs. What is missing today is a means to assess the impact of nSoft. Metrics need to be established to assess its effectiveness.

The nSoft consortium is developing a more facile engagement with industry.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR should establish quality and success metrics for nSoft.

RECOMMENDATION: The NCNR should develop an additional umbrella organization for hard matter and industrial interactions.

Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"7 Key Findings and Recommendations." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25282.
×
Page 30
Next: Acronyms »
An Assessment of the Center for Neutron Research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology: Fiscal Year 2018 Get This Book
×
Buy Ebook | $9.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

At the request of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has, since 1959 annually assembled panels of experts from academia, industry, medicine, and other scientific and engineering environments to assess the quality and effectiveness of the NIST measurements and standards laboratories, of which there are now seven, as well as the adequacy of the laboratories’ resources. This report assesses the scientific and technical work performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Center for Neutron Research in the fiscal year 2018. It reviews the organization's technical programs; the portfolio of scientific expertise within the organization; the adequacy of the organization's facilities, equipment, and human resources; and the effectiveness with which the organization disseminates its program outputs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!