Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
201Â Â Relationship to Other Resilience Frameworks A P P E N D I X A A variety of resilience-oriented frameworks have been developed by many different organizations and groups for a range of purposes. This has caused some confusion in the transportation profession about what approach should be used. Table 41 identifies some of these major resilience frameworks and their relationship to the Framework. The other frameworks are presented in the reverse date of publication and are focused on examples from the United States (for international examples, see a review by the Overseas Development Institute). As noted at the beginning of this guide, the Framework and its associated self-assessment tool provide a unique overarching perspective on organizational capability for implementing resilience-oriented actions. The guide offers guidance on how to make a transportation agency more capable in planning, providing, operating, and maintaining a resilient transportation system. Many of the other frameworks noted in the table can be used within the overall context of the Framework and the self-assessment tool. Determining organizational capability and capacity, however, needs to be done systematically and requires its own comprehensive analysis approach.
Table 41. Examples of Resilience Frameworks Offered by Other Groups. Name Group Date Description Relationship to Guide Tool Source NCHRP Research Report 976: Resilience Primer for Transportation Executives NCHRP Forth- coming High-level guidance to DOT chief executive officers (CEOs) on how resilience activities can be considered as part of their responsibilities. Eight categories of actions are presented, e.g., "integrate resilience throughout your agency." Companion document to this guide. See Table 1 for comparison between this primer and the guide. https://apps.trb.org/ cmsfeed/TRBNet ProjectDisplay.asp? ProjectID=4260 Cyber Resilience Review DHS 2017 Focus on cyber protection, assessment seeks to understand an organizationâs capacities and capabilities in performing, planning, managing, measuring, and defining cybersecurity practices and behaviors in ten domains: (1) asset management, (2) controls management, (3) configuration and change management, (4) vulnerability management, (5) incident management, (6) service continuity management, (7) risk management, (8) external dependency management, (9) training and awareness, and (10) situational awareness. Tool is a useful more detailed approach for conducting risk assessments by cyberattacks and could be used in concert with this guide for such threats. https://us-cert.cisa. gov/sites/default/ files/c3vp/crr-fact- sheet.pdf Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Framework, 3rd Edition FHWA 2017 A manual that helps transportation agencies and their partners assess the vulnerability of transportation infrastructure and systems to extreme weather and climate effects. It also examines how agencies can integrate climate adaptation considerations into transportation decision-making. A framework provides an in-depth and structured process for conducting a vulnerability assessment. The framework describes the primary steps involved in conducting a vulnerability assessment. For each step, the framework features examples from assessments conducted nationwide between 2010 and 2017 and includes links to related resources that practitioners can access for additional information. Provides approaches to conduct vulnerability assessments and for incorporating results into decision-making. https://www.fhwa.dot. gov/environment/ sustainability/ resilience/adaptation_ framework/
DHS â Department of Homeland Security NCHRP â National Cooperative Highway Research Program NIST â National Institute of Standards and Technology Community Resilience Guide NIST 2016 For each hazard type, transportation infrastructure assets are identified and categorized by function. For transportation systems operations, resilience measurement focuses on a âbouncing backâ aspect of resilience. The Guide highlights the interdependencies of the transportation sector with other sectors. Provides a broad community perspective on resilience within which transportation systems constitute one component. https://www.nist.gov/ community- resilience/planning- guide
