National Academies Press: OpenBook

Repair and Maintenance of Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges (2021)

Chapter: Chapter 4 - Summary and Conclusions

« Previous: Chapter 3 - Case Examples
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 4 - Summary and Conclusions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Repair and Maintenance of Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26172.
Page 62

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

62 Concerted efforts to improve the durability of post-tensioned bridges have been made since the technology made it into the concrete bridge industry, yet opportunities for further improve- ment remain. For some states, existing PT structures continue to require repair and maintenance actions. Often, these are the solutions that bridge owners have formulated after consultation with industry consultants and one key agency—the Florida Department of Transportation. Some states on the other hand, such as Texas and California, have many PT structures in their inventories, but they did not report in their survey response that they had instigated repairs. Lessons of the current state-of-the-practice can be gathered from the results of a survey of state departments of transportation on their construction, inspection, and repair practices specific to PT structures. Several findings of the survey and case examples are salient: • A majority of states have PT structures (44). • The number of PT structures in different states is widely varied, with some states having no or few structures, and others having hundreds. • Many states (23) have experience with PT repair. • While many state DOTs are referencing key guidance documents (such as PTI/ASBI M50 and PTI M55) or other states’ specifications when developing or updating their own PT speci- fications, nonuniformity is significant from state to state. • Consideration of durability during the design phase, through the designation of a protection level, for example, is not widely practiced among state DOTs. • Issues related to methods of construction remain. Most often, they are related to the process of grout/filler injection and duct pressure testing prior to injection. • State DOTs continue to have issues with particular materials specific to PT construction, most notably grout filler materials and pour-back materials. • Several state DOTs have made it a standard practice to make provisions for the installation of tendons in the future to provide redundancy when addressing issues with a PT structure. • Routine inspections are not sufficient in identifying issues in PT structures before they become severe. As found in several of the case examples, evidence of PT system damage was not identified before the situation became critical. Inspection by persons with PT-specific experience is recommended. • Recently, states have begun to use materials in novel applications in an effort to improve the corrosion protection of existing structures, including the use of injectable, proprietary corrosion inhibitors and flexible filler materials (such as microcrystalline waxes). Several states have injected proprietary corrosion inhibitors into compromised tendons. C H A P T E R 4 Summary and Conclusions

Next: Acronyms and Abbreviations »
Repair and Maintenance of Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges Get This Book
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The use of post-tensioning in concrete structures has allowed for the construction of economical long-span bridges. However, very limited information is available to guide bridge owners on how to maintain existing structures or, more specifically, to repair degraded post-tensioned structures.

The TRB National Cooperative Highway Research Program's NCHRP Synthesis 562: Repair and Maintenance of Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges gathers information on the practices used by bridge owners to repair and maintain post-tensioned bridges and facilitates knowledge transfer across state departments of transportation (DOTs), aiding bridge owners in the identification of repair practices that are working and that will extend the useful life of the bridges.

Supplemental materials to the report include appendices containing the survey and the survey responses.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!