National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26264.
×
Page 11
Page 12
Suggested Citation:"Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26264.
×
Page 12
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"Endnotes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/26264.
×
Page 13

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

racial equity addendum to critical issues in transportation 11 endnotes 1. Hu, L., and G. Giuliano. 2017. Poverty concentration, job access, and employment outcomes. Journal of Urban Affairs 39:1. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ abs/10.1111/juaf.12152. 2. Blumenberg, E. 2017. Social equity and urban transportation. Chapter 13 in The geography of urban transportation, fourth edition, S. Hanson and G. Giuliano (eds.). The Guilford Press. 3. McKenzie, B. S. 2013. Neighborhood access to transit by race, ethnicity, and poverty in Portland, OR. City and Community 12(2):134– 155. 4. Sanchez, T. W., R. Stolz, and J. S. Ma. 2003. Moving to equity: Addressing inequitable effects of transportation policies on minorities. Center for Community Change and The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. https://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/ research/metro-and-regional-inequalities/ transportation/moving-to-equity-addressing- inequitable-effects-of-transportation-policies- on-minorities/sanchez-moving-to-equity- transportation-policies.pdf. 5. Probst, J. C., S. B. Laditka, J.-Y. Wang, and A. O. Johnson. 2007. Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: Cross sectional analysis of the 2001 U.S. National Household Travel Survey. BMC Health Services Research 7:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-40. 6. Boyles, B., E. Brinton, A. Dunning, A. Mathias, and M. Sorrell. 2006. Native American transit: Current practices, needs, and barriers. Transportation Research Record 156(1):103– 110. 7. Blumenberg, E. 2017. Social equity and urban transportation. Chapter 13 in The geography of urban transportation, fourth edition, S. Hanson and G. Giuliano (eds.). The Guilford Press. 8. Kneebone, E., and N. Holmes. 2015. The growing distance between people and jobs in metropolitan America. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2016/07/Srvy_JobsProximity.pdf. 9. Morris, E., E. Blumenberg, and E. Guerra. 2020. Does lacking a car put a brake on activity participation? Private vehicle access and access to opportunities among low-income adults. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 136:375–397. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.021. 10. Perry, A. 2018. The route school buses can take toward racial equity. The Hechinger Report, June 19. https://hechingerreport. org/the-route-school-buses-can-take- toward-racial-equity. See also Urban Institute. 2018. The road to school: How far students travel to school in the choice-rich cities of Denver, Detroit, New Orleans, New York City, and Washington, DC. Urban Institute Student Transportation Working Group. https://www.urban.org/sites/ default/files/publication/97151/the_road_ to_school_6.pdf. 11. Blumenberg, E., and T. Thomas. 2014. Travel behavior of the poor after welfare reform. Transportation Research Record 2452(1). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ abs/10.3141/2452-07. 12. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2011. Percent and characteristics of zero-vehicle households. https://www.bts.gov/archive/ publications/highlights_of_the_2001_ national_household_travel_survey/table_ a04. 13. Sanchez, T. W., Q. Shen, and Z-R. Peng. 2004. Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 41(7):1313–1331. 14. Tomer, A., E. Kneebone, R. Puentes, and A. Berube. 2011. Missed opportunity: Transit and jobs in metropolitan America. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution. https:// www.brookings.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2016/06/0512_jobs_transit.pdf. 15. Butler, A. W., E. J. Mayer, and J. P. Weston. 2021. Racial discrimination in the auto loan market. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3301009. 16. U.S. Department of Justice. 2015. Justice department and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reach groundbreaking settlement to resolve allegations of auto lending discrimination by Honda. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice- department-and-consumer-financial- protection-bureau-reach-groundbreaking- settlement. 17. Angwin, J., J. Larson, L. Kirchner, and S. Mattu. 2017. Minority neighborhoods pay higher car insurance premiums than white areas with the same risk. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/ minority-neighborhoods-higher-car- insurance-premiums-white-areas-same- risk. TRB and its community of volunteers strive for a fairer and more equitable society by examining and acknowledging the ways in which transportation contributes to racial inequalities, can work to change them, and can be part of the solution. This addendum is only one part of the overall effort. TRB intends to work to improve racial equity in the coming years and decades through inclusion of these research topics in workshops, pooled-fund studies, and consensus study reports. TRB will also work with its colleagues throughout the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, along with colleagues throughout and beyond the transportation industry, to achieve a fairer and more equitable society.

trb | transportation research board12 18. National Fair Housing Alliance. 2018. Discrimination when buying a car: How the color of your skin can affect your car-shopping experience. https:// nationalfairhousing.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/01/Discrimination-When- Buying-a-Car-FINAL-1-11-2018.pdf. 19. Pendall, R., E. Blumenberg, and C. Dawkins. 2016. What if cities combined car-based solutions to improve access to opportunity? Urban Institute. https:// www.urban.org/research/publication/ what-if-cities-combined-car-based- solutions-transit-improve-access- opportunity. 20. Gehr, J. 2018. Eliminating asset limits: Creating savings for families and state governments. Policy Brief, Center for Law and Social Policy. https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/ files/publications/2018/04/2018_ eliminatingassetlimits.pdf. 21. The Pew Charitable Trusts. 2016. Do limits on family assets affect participation in, cost of TANF? https://www.pewtrusts. org/-/media/assets/2016/07/do_limits_ on_family_assets_affect_participation_ in_costs_of_tanf.pdf. 22. Carnegie, J. A. 2007. Driver’s license suspensions, impacts and fairness study. Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center at Rutgers University. FHWA NJ-2007-020. https://www.nj.gov/transportation/ business/research/reports/FHWA-NJ- 2007-020-V1.pdf. 23. Aiken, J. 2016. Reinstating common sense: How driver’s license suspensions for drug offenses unrelated to driving are falling out of favor. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/driving/ national.html. 24. Tan, S., A. Fowers, D. Keating, and L. Tierney. 2020. Amid the pandemic, public transit is highlighting inequalities in cities. The Washington Post, May 15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ nation/2020/05/15/amid-pandemic- public-transit-is-highlighting-inequalities- cities. 25. McCahill, C. 2020. Transit is essential for essential workers. State Smart Transportation Initiative, December 8. https://ssti.us/2020/12/08/transit-is- essential-for-essential-workers. 26. TransitCenter. 2020. Transit is essential: 2.8 million U.S. essential workers ride transit to their jobs. https://transitcenter. org/2-8-million-u-s-essential-workers- ride-transit-to-their-jobs. 27. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Special Report 337: The role of transit, shared modes, and public policy in the new mobility landscape. The National Academies Press. http://doi. org/10.17226/26053. 28. Shaheen, S, C. Bell, A. Cohen, and B. Yelchuru. 2017. Travel behavior: Shared mobility and transportation equity. U.S. Department of Transportation. Report # PL- 18-007. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ otps/shared_use_mobility_equity_final. pdf. 29. Hoffmann, M. L. 2016. Bike lanes are white lanes: Bicycle advocacy and urban planning. University of Nebraska Press. 30. Flanagan, E., U. Lachapelle, and A. El- Geneidy. 2016. Riding tandem: Does cycling infrastructure investment mirror gentrification and privilege in Portland, OR and Chicago, IL? Research in Transportation Economics 60:14–24. 31. Stein, S. 2011. Bike lanes and gentrification: New York City’s shades of green. Progressive Planning 188:34–37. 32. Qian, X., and M. Jaller. 2021. Bikeshare destination choices and accessibility among disadvantaged communities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 91:102686. 33. Qian, X., and M. Jaller. 2019. Station- level analysis for bikeshare activity in disadvantaged communities. University of California Davis Research Report No. 19-05222. https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/ publication_detail.php?id=3197. 34. Shaheen, S., C. Bell, A. Cohen, and B. Yelchuru. 2017. Travel behavior: Shared mobility and transportation equity. U.S. Department of Transportation. Report # PL-18-007. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ policy/otps/shared_use_mobility_equity_ final.pdf. 35. Bullard, R. D., G. S. Johnson, and A. O. Torres (eds.). 2004. Highway robbery: Transportation racism & new routes to equity. South End Press. 36. Savitch, H., and S. Adhikari. 2017. Fragmented regionalism: Why metropolitan America continues to splinter. Urban Affairs Review 53(2). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ full/10.1177/1078087416630626. 37. Karner, A. 2018. Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data. Journal of Transport Geography 67:24–32. 38. Karner, A., and A. Golub. 2015. Comparison of two common approaches to public transit service equity evaluation. Transportation Research Record 2531(1):170–179. 39. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Special Report 337: The role of transit, shared modes, and public policy in the new mobility landscape. The National Academies Press. http://doi.org/10.17226/26053. 40. Harris, D. 1999. Driving while Black: Racial profiling on our nation’s highways. American Civil Liberties Union. http:// www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract. aspx?ID=182825. 41. Baumgartner, F. R., D. A. Epp, and K. Shoulb. 2018. Suspect citizens: What 20 million traffic stops tell us about policing and race. Cambridge University Press. 42. Rushin, S., and G. Edwards. 2021. An empirical assessment of pretextual stops and racial profiling. Stanford Law Review 73. https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp- content/uploads/sites/3/2021/03/Rushin- Edwards-73-Stan.-L.-Rev.-637.pdf. 43. Sanchez, T. W., R. Stolz, and J. S. Ma. 2003. Moving to equity: Addressing inequitable effects of transportation policies on minorities. Center for Community Change and The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. https://civilrightsproject. ucla.edu/research/metro-and-regional- inequalities/transportation/moving-to- equity-addressing-inequitable-effects- of-transportation-policies-on-minorities/ sanchez-moving-to-equity-transportation- policies.pdf. 44. Bullard, R. D. 2003. Addressing urban transportation equity in the United States. Fordham Urban Law Journal 31(5):1183– 1209. 45. Twaddell, H., and B. Zgoda. 2020. Equity analysis in regional transportation planning processes, volume 1: Guide. TCRP Research Report 214. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi. org/10.17226/25860. 46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. Environmental justice. https://www.epa. gov/environmentaljustice/learn-about- environmental-justice. 47. Karner, A., A. Golub, K. Martens, and G. Robinson. 2017. Transportation and environmental justice: History and emerging practice. In The Routledge handbook of environmental justice. R. Holifield, J. Chakraborty, and G. Walker (eds.). Routledge.

racial equity addendum to critical issues in transportation 13 48. Karner, A., and R. A. Marcantonio. 2018. Achieving transportation equity: Meaningful public involvement to meet the needs of underserved communities. Public Works Management & Policy 23(2):105–126. 49. London, J., J. Sze, and R. S. Liévanos. 2008. Problems, promise, progress, and perils: Critical reflections on environmental justice policy implementation in California. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 26:255–289. 50. Karner, A., and R. A. Marcantonio. 2018. Achieving transportation equity: Meaningful public involvement to meet the needs of underserved communities. Public Works Management & Policy 23(2):105–126. 51. Taylor, B. D., and P. M. Ong. 1995. Spatial mismatch or automobile mismatch? An examination of race, residence and commuting in U.S. metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 32(9):1453–1473. 52. Grengs, J., J. Levina, and Q. Shen. 2013. Evaluating transportation equity: An intermetropolitan comparison of regional accessibility and urban form. Federal Transit Administration Report 66. https://www. transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/FTA_ Report_No._0066.pdf. 53. Kain, J. F. 1968. Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 82(2):175. https://doi. org/10.2307/1885893. 54. Howell, A. J., and J. M. Timberlake. 2014. Racial and ethnic trends in the suburbanization of poverty in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1980– 2010. Journal of Urban Affairs 36(1):79–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12030. 55. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. 2006. Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72(4): 475–490. 56. Cho, S. H., and H. C. Park. 2021. Exploring the behaviour change of crowding impedance on public transit due to COVID-19 pandemic: Before and after comparison. Transportation Letters 367–374. https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/19427867.2021.1897937. 57. Hu, S., and P. Chen. 2021. Who left riding transit? Examining socioeconomic disparities in the impact of COVID-19 on ridership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 90:102654. 58. Banerjee, T., D. Bahl, K. Barrow, A. Eisenlohr, J. Rodriguez, Q. Wallace, and H.-T. Hamme. 2018. Institutional response to transit oriented development in the Los Angeles metropolitan area: Understanding local differences through the prism of density, diversity, and design. METRANS Transportation Consortium. University of Southern California. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/335105484_Institutional_ Response_to_Transit_Oriented_ Development_in_the_Los_Angeles_ Metropolitan_Area_Understanding_Local_ Differences_through_the_Prism_of_ Density_Diversity_and_Design. 59. Padiero, M., A. Loruo, and N. M. da Costa. 2020. Transit-oriented development and gentrification: A systematic review. Transport Reviews 39(6):733–754. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1649316. 60. Chatman, D. G., R. Xu, J. Park, and A. Spevack. 2019. Does transit-oriented gentrification increase driving? Journal of Planning Education and Research 39(4):482–495. https://doi. org/10.1177/0739456X19872255. 61. Bakelmun, A., and S. J. Shoenfeld. 2020. Open data and racial segregation: Mapping the historic imprint of racial covenants and redlining on American cities. In Open Cities | Open Data, S. Hawken, H. Han, and C. Pettit (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-13-6605-5_3. 62. Aaronson, D., D. Hartley, and B. Mazumder. 2017. The effects of the 1930s HOLC “redlining” maps. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper 2017-12. http://hdl. handle.net/10419/200568. 63. Frey, W. H. 2021. Neighborhood segregation persists for Black, Latino or Hispanic, and Asian Americans. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/ research/neighborhood-segregation- persists-for-black-latino-or-hispanic-and- asian-americans. 64. Houston, D., and M. Zuniga. 2019. Put a park on it: How freeway parks are reconnecting and greening divided cities. Cities 98–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cities.2018.08.007. 65. McCormick, K. 2020. Deconstruction ahead: How urban highway removal is changing our cities. Landlines, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. https://www.lincolninst. edu/publications/articles/2020-03- deconstruction-ahead-urban-highway- removal-changing-cities. 66. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Appendix A in Communities in action: Pathways to health equity. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24624.

Next: BackCover »
Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation Get This Book
×
 Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Racism has been overt in transportation. For example, the segregation of races on intercity trains led to the infamous 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson “separate but equal” Supreme Court doctrine that stood for more than half a century. While many discriminatory policies have been reversed by the courts and in constitutional amendments, their impacts on society have not been fully remedied and persist.

TRB’s Racial Equity Addendum to Critical Issues in Transportation is intended to be a step in the process of identifying and building a research agenda for transportation that will help to more fully identify and address inequities and injustices caused and contributed to by transportation. While some equity-related issues were identified in Critical Issues in Transportation 2019, the topic was not discussed in depth. In response to the candid and critical national dialogue on racial equity in 2020 and 2021, this addendum tackles racial equity exclusively and with additional consciousness about its transportation dimensions

The report covers research topics ranging from access to automobiles and public transit; institutional issues in decision making, planning, and public participation; land use and affordable housing; displacement and redlining; Native American transportation issues; and more.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!