National Academies Press: OpenBook

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)

Chapter: Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams

« Previous: Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan
Suggested Citation:"Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams." National Research Council. 2009. Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12627.
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams." National Research Council. 2009. Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12627.
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams." National Research Council. 2009. Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12627.
Page 91

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability James C. McWilliams* In the way of an oracle, I offer the following remarks about the future of physical oceanography: Because of broadband intrinsic variability in currents and material distributions and because of the electromagnetic opacity of seawater, the ocean is severely undersampled by measurements and likely to remain so. (Surface remote sensing makes a wonderful exception.) The most impor- tant instrumental advances will be ones that improve on this situation. Computational simulation of realistic oceanic situations is steadily growing in capacity and usage. Given the first remark, this is a very good thing. It supports a dual strategy of using measurements to inspire and test models, and using models to design experiments and extend the scope of measurements. So far, planning for field experiments that embody this duality is still rarely done well. In 1997 NSF convened a similar futurism workshop (APROPOS), and I contributed a white paper describing practices and trends in numerical modeling that still seems apt (McWilliams 1998). I would now add two further remarks. First, accumu- lating experience supports the hypothesis that such simulations—even if sometimes remarkably like nature in their emergent patterns, phenom- ena, and multivariate relationships—have an inherent, irreducible impre- cision compared to measured quantities in turbulent (chaotic) regimes (McWilliams 2007). This extends to irreproducibility among different * University of California, Los Angeles 89

90 OCEANOGRAPHY IN 2025 model codes putatively solving the same problem (n.b., the persistent spread among global-warming simulations). The imprecision is due to the model composition with its non-unique choices for numerical algorithms, parameterizations, and couplings among different processes. Testing and digesting this hypothesis and acting on its implications are strongly rec- ommended. Second, there is a serious, unsolved infrastructure problem in oceanic modeling, viz., how to increase and depersonalize model docu- mentation, calibration, and availability in support of widespread usage without impeding the necessary, continuing evolution of what is still a young technology. How many published model results are reproducible by a reader, hence verifiable? How can we facilitate the interfaces between model makers and users? How can anyone other than the IPCC go about deploying an ensemble of different models to understand the spread of their answers for a range of problems? (Even the IPCC’s is an inadvertent ensemble.) For reasons that have a lot to do with measurement undersampling and model immaturity, oceanography is only now moving into a bloom of discovery about distinctive types of variability within the submeso- scale regime (10s–1000s m; hours–days). This is an awkward scale regime for the usual measurements: small compared to most remote-sensing footprints; large compared to a ship’s range; and subtle to distinguish from inertia-gravity waves in point time series. There is an emerging, provisional paradigm for non-wave submesoscale variability. Its primary energy source is mesoscale eddies and currents, which confounds the theoretical (and computationally confirmed) prediction of up-scale energy transfer in geostrophic, hydrostatic flows. It is manifest in frontogenesis, frontal instability, coherent vortices (including the notorious “spirals on the sea” often seen in reflectance images but never measured in situ), “mixed-layer” instability, unstable topographic wakes, “arrested” topo- graphic waves, ageostrophic instability of geostrophic currents, sponta- neous wave emission by currents, temperature and material filaments, horizontal wavenumber spectra with shallow slopes, probability density functions with wide and skewed tails (e.g., near-surface cyclonic vortic- ity and downwelling velocity), and acoustic scattering patterns of lenses and layers (e.g., in geoseismic surveys). It affects a forward cascade of both kinetic and available potential energy and thus provides a route to dissipation for the general circulation (via mesoscale instability) that is probably globally significant. This cascade supports a microscale inte- rior diapycnal material mixing that sometimes may be competitive with breaking internal waves. It also induces density restratification (an appar- ent vertical unmixing!) that is especially effective around the surface mixed layer. It provides important material transport between the surface mixed and euphotic layers and the underlying pycnocline and nutricline,

James C. McWilliams 91 and it sometimes provides important horizontal transport. As yet, only a few flows have been simulated, only a few theories devised, and only a few regions measured for their submesoscale variability. This family of phenomena deserves a lot of attention in the coming decades. The disciplinary borders of physical oceanography are increasingly indefensible with respect to both scientific content and the education and recruitment of new researchers. This view should be embraced in our institutional homes. References McWilliams, J.C. 1998. Trends in Numerical Modeling for Physical Oceanography. Excerpted from the Future of Physical Oceanography: Report of the APROPOS Workshop. Available: McWilliams, J.C. 2007. Irreducible Imprecision in Atmospheric and Oceanic Simulations. PNAS. 104: 8709-8713.

Next: Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman »
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
Buy Paperback | $60.00 Buy Ebook | $47.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

On January 8 and 9, 2009, the Ocean Studies Board of the National Research Council, in response to a request from the Office of Naval Research, hosted the "Oceanography in 2025" workshop. The goal of the workshop was to bring together scientists, engineers, and technologists to explore future directions in oceanography, with an emphasis on physical processes. The focus centered on research and technology needs, trends, and barriers that may impact the field of oceanography over the next 16 years, and highlighted specific areas of interest: submesoscale processes, air-sea interactions, basic and applied research, instrumentation and vehicles, ocean infrastructure, and education.

To guide the white papers and drive discussions, four questions were posed to participants:

What research questions could be answered?

What will remain unanswered?

What new technologies could be developed?

How will research be conducted?

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!