National Academies Press: OpenBook

Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities (2015)

Chapter: Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

Appendix A

Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data

This appendix presents an expanded version of Table 2-2 (in Chapter 2), providing a detailed overview of the precision and usability of five key American Community Survey variables: (1) persons living in poverty, (2) occupied housing units that are renter occupied, (3) households receiving benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in the past 12 months, (4) persons who are foreign born, and (5) the population aged 25 and older with a graduate or professional degree.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

TABLE A-1 Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data (in percentage)

Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
National Estimate 14.9 34.5 11.4 12.9 10.6
National Margin of Error ±0.1 ±0.2 ±0.1 ±0.1 ±0.1
All Tractse

Tract range

0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-100

Tract mean

16.0 35.2 12.5 12.2 10.3

Tract median

12.6 29.8 9.2 6.9 7.2

Tract median CV

28.3 14.7 29.5 29.7 26.0

Tract median MoE

5.8 6.7 4.6 3.4 3.2

CV ≤ 30%

56 88 51 50 61

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

35 9 29 29 27

CV > 50%

9 2 20 21 12

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

59 80 45 30 17

MoE > estimate

4 1 16 15 8

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4 1 16 15 8

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.17 (125 tracts) 1.4 (1034 tracts) 0.1 (89 tracts) 0.05 (37 tracts) 0.1 (64 tracts)
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0 Percentage of Persons Living in Povertyf Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedg Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsh Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Borni Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreej
Tract range 0.02-96.3 0.14-99.8 0.04-94.2 0.02-95.0 0.02-97.4

Tract mean

16.0 34.9 12.9 12.5 10.4

Tract median

12.6 29.7 9.7 7.2 7.3

Tract median CV

28.4 14.8 30.3 30.4 26.2

Tract median MoE

5.8 6.7 4.8 3.5 3.2

CV ≤ 30%

55 88 49 49 60

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

35 9 30 30 27

CV > 50%

9 2 20 21 13

Confidence interval ≥ 10 percentage points

59 80 46 31 17

MoE > estimate

4 1 13 13 7

Confidence interval lower bound < 0

4 1 13 13 7

Confidence interval upper bound > 100

0.11 (78 tracts) 0.8 (541 tracts) 0.01 (10 tracts) 0.02 (11 tracts) .03 (19 tracts)
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval Width ≥ 10 Percentage Points by CV Category, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0                    

CV ≤ 30%

73 84 69 48 24

CV > 30 and ≤ 50%

46 58 33 19 9

CV > 50%

30 32 11 8 6
Median CVs by Tract Total Population Size  

All Tracts

< 1,000 31.3 18.7 27.2 43.6 37.6
1,000-2,999 29.0 16.0 29.6 38.6 31.4
3,000-4,999 28.1 14.3 29.3 29.6 25.9
5,000-6,999 28.2 14.1 29.8 25.2 23.5
7,000+ 27.8 14.4 29.5 20.7 20.8

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

  < 1,000

37.2 24.6 40.7 54.7 49.4
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

1,000-2,999

29.1 16.2 30.6 40.2 31.9

3,000-4,999

28.1 14.4 30.0 30.1 26.0

5,000-6,999

28.2 14.1 30.4 25.3 23.6

7,000+

27.8 14.4 29.9 20.8 20.8
Median CV by Tract Number of Housing Units

All Tracts

≤ 400

32.6 12.0 23.7 29.8 42.9

401-1,000

31.6 18.0 31.8 34.1 35.5

1,001-2,000

28.4 14.9 29.2 30.9 27.4

2,001-4,000

27.4 13.6 29.1 28.1 22.7

4,001-6,000

27.2 13.4 31.8 20.8 17.0

6,001+

26.4 13.7 40.4 16.0 14.2

Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

48.6 28.9 63.1 35.6 58.5

401-1,000

31.7 18.3 33.2 36.2 36.5

1,001-2,000

28.4 15.0 29.9 31.5 27.5

2,001-4,000

27.4 13.6 29.6 28.3 22.7

4,001-6,000

27.2 13.4 32.4 20.8 17.0

6,001+

26.4 13.7 40.7 16.0 14.2
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

83 93 79 58 61

1,000-2,999

68 86 60 34 28

3,000-4,999

59 80 46 32 16

5,000-6,999

54 77 38 28 11

7,000+

46 67 29 23 6
Confidence Interval ≥ 10 Percentage Points by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

88 95 85 45 56

401-1,000

72 88 66 43 30

1,001-2,000

61 81 49 32 17

2,001-4,000

53 77 36 25 13
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

4,001-6,000

38 63 16 17 14

6,001+

25 54 10 15 16
MoE > Estimate by Tract Population Size, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

< 1,000

25 14 34 43 39

1,000-2,999

6 2 14 22 13

3,000-4,999

4 1 12 11 6

5,000-6,999

3 0.5 12 7 3

7,000+

2 0.4 10 3 2
MoE > Estimate by Tract Number of Housing Units, Excluding Tracts Where CV = 0

≤ 400

36 20 52 22 47

401-1,000

9 3 17 22 19

1,001-2,000

4 1 13 14 7

2,001-4,000

2 0.3 11 8 2

4,001-6,000

1 0 12 1 0.2
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Characteristics Percentage of Persons Living in Povertya Percentage of Occupied Housing Units That Are Renter Occupiedb Percentage of Households Receiving SNAP Benefits in Past 12 Monthsc Percentage of Persons Who Are Foreign Born Percentage of Population Aged 25+ with a Graduate or Professional Degreed
6,001+ 1 0 13 2 0

 

aTracts with no persons in the universe for which poverty rates are calculated were excluded from this analysis.

bTracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

cSNAP is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; tracts with no households were excluded from this analysis.

dTracts with no persons aged 25 and older were excluded from this analysis.

eTracts with zero population are excluded.

fThere are 265 tracts excluded because the estimated poverty rate equals zero. When the poverty rate is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

gThere are 596 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero or the percentage of renter-occupied households equals zero. When the percentage renter occupied is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

hThere are 2,754 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero or the percentage with SNAP benefits equals zero. When the percentage with SNAP benefits is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

iThere are 1,806 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of the foreign-born population equals zero or the percentage of the foreign–born population equals zero. When the percentage population is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

jThere are 940 tracts excluded because either the standard error of the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero or the percentage of persons with a professional degree equals zero. When the percentage with a professional degree is zero, the CV cannot be calculated and is set to zero.

NOTE: MoE is margin of error; CV is coefficient of variation.

SOURCE: Panel analysis of data from the 2008-2012 ACS Summary File, available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/summary_file/ [September 2014].

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 128
Next: Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates »
Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities Get This Book
×
 Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities
Buy Paperback | $56.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The American Community Survey (ACS) was conceptualized as a replacement to the census long form, which collected detailed population and housing data from a sample of the U.S. population, once a decade, as part of the decennial census operations. The long form was traditionally the main source of socio-economic information for areas below the national level. The data provided for small areas, such as counties, municipalities, and neighborhoods is what made the long form unique, and what makes the ACS unique today. Since the successful transition from the decennial long form in 2005, the ACS has become an invaluable resource for many stakeholders, particularly for meeting national and state level data needs. However, due to inadequate sample sizes, a major challenge for the survey is producing reliable estimates for smaller geographic areas, which is a concern because of the unique role fulfilled by the long form, and now the ACS, of providing data with a geographic granularity that no other federal survey could provide. In addition to the primary challenge associated with the reliability of the estimates, this is also a good time to assess other aspects of the survey in order to identify opportunities for refinement based on the experience of the first few years.

Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey provides input on ways of improving the ACS, focusing on two priority areas: identifying methods that could improve the quality of the data available for small areas, and suggesting changes that would increase the survey's efficiency in responding to new data needs. This report considers changes that the ACS office should consider over the course of the next few years in order to further improve the ACS data. The recommendations of Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey will help the Census Bureau improve performance in several areas, which may ultimately lead to improved data products as the survey enters its next decade.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!