National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Policies Supporting Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

References

ACEEE (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy). 2012. The 2014 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. http://www.aceee.org/research-report/u1408.

Acemoglu, D., P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn, and D. Hemous. 2012. The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review 102(1):131-166.

Acemoglu, D., U. Akcigit, D. Hanley, and W. Kerr. 2014. Transition to clean technology. Working paper 20743. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Adams, S.P. 2006. Promotion, competition, captivity: The political economy of coal. Journal of Policy History 18(1):74-95.

Adams, S.P. 2010. Energy and politics. In The Princeton encyclopedia of American political history, edited by M. Kazin, R. Edwards, and A. Rothman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 207-211.

Adler, J. 2011. Eyes on a climate prize: Rewarding energy innovation to achieve climate stabilization. Harvard Environmental Law Review 35(1):1-45.

AEE (Advanced Energy Economy). 2014. Creating a 21st century electricity system for New York State: An energy industry working group position paper. http://info.aee.net/21st-century-ny-energy-industry-wg-position-paper (accessed June 29, 2016).

AEIC (American Energy Innovation Council). 2010. A business plan for America’s energy future: Technical appendices. Washington, DC: AEIC.

Alberini, A., and C. Towe. 2015. Information v. energy efficiency incentives: Evidence from residential electricity consumption in Maryland. Energy Economics 52:S30-S40.

Aldy, J.E. 2011. A preliminary review of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act’s Clean Energy package. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP11-048. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

Allcott, H., and M. Greenstone. 2012. Is there an energy efficiency gap? Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1):3-28.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Allcott, H., and S. Mullainathan. 2010. Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970):1204-1205.

Allcott, H., and T. Rogers. 2014. The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review 104(10):3003-3037.

Allcott, H., and D. Taubinsky. 2015. Evaluating behaviorally motivated policy: Experimental evidence from the lightbulb market. American Economic Review 105(8):2501-2538.

Anadon, L. D., M. Bunn, G. Chan, M. Chan, C. Jones, R. Kempener, A. Lee, N. Logar, and V. Narayanamurti. 2011. Transforming U.S. energy innovation. November. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/uploads/energy-report-january-2012.pdf.

APPA (American Public Power Association). 2014. 2014-15 annual directory and statistical report. Arlington, VA: APPA.

Apt, J., and P. Jaramillo. 2014. Variable renewable energy and the electricity grid. New York: RFF Press.

Argote, L., S.L. Beckman, and D. Epple. 1990. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science 36(2):140-154.

Arimura, T.H., S. Li, R.G. Newell, and K. Palmer. 2011. Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs. Working paper 17556. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

ARPA-E (Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy). 2016. Department of Energy announces 14 new projects for window efficiency technologies. ARPA-E Newsletter, May 18. http://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=news-item/department-energy-announces-14-new-projects-window-efficiency-technologies.

Arrow, K. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies 29(3):155-173.

ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2011. Failure to act: The economic impact of current investment trends in electricity infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.

ASCE. 2013. 2013 report card for America’s infrastructure. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/documents/2013-ReportCard.pdf.

Auffhammer, M., C. Blumstein, and M. Fowlie. 2008. Demand-side management and energy efficiency revisited. The Energy Journal 29(3):91-104.

Austin, D. 2012. Addressing market barriers to energy efficiency in buildings. CBO working paper 2012-10. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/AddressingMarketBarriersToEnergyEfficiencyInBuildings_WorkingPaper_2012-10.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Ayre, J. 2014. Japanese manufacturer solar frontier mulling factory in New York. Clean Technica, September 30. http://cleantechnica.com/2014/09/30/japanese-manufacturer-solar-frontier-mulling-factory-new-york.

Baker, E., V. Bosetti, L.D. Anadon, M. Henrion, L.A. Reis. 2015. Future costs of key low-carbon energy technologies: Harmonization and aggregation of energy technology expert elicitation data. Energy Policy 80(2015):219-232.

Banerjee, A., and B.D. Solomon. 2003. Eco-labeling for energy efficiency and sustainability: A meta-evaluation of US programs. Energy Policy 31(2):109-123.

Barbose, G., C. Goldman, I. Hoffman, and M. Billingsley. 2013. The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the United States: Projected spending and savings to 2025. LBNL-5803E. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-5803e.pdf.

Barbose, G., S. Weaver, and N. Darghouth. 2014. Tracking the sun VII: An historical summary of the installed price of photovoltaics in the United States from 1998-2013. http://emp.lbl.gov/publications/tracking-sun-vii-historical-summary-installed-price-photovoltaics-united-states-1998-20.

Battelle Memorial Institute. 2011. 2012 global R&D funding forecast. R&D Magazine, December. http://www.battelle.org/docs/default-document-library/2012_global_forecast.pdf.

Behr, P. 2011. Futuristic U.S. power reactor may be developed overseas. The New York Times, June 23. http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2011/06/23/23climatewire-futuristic-us-power-reactor-may-be-developed-86684.html.

Bell, M.L., K. Ebisu, R.D. Peng, J. Walker, J.M. Samet, S.L. Zeger, and F. Dominici. 2008. Seasonal and regional short-term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 2020 U.S. counties, 1999-2005. American Journal of Epidemiology 168(11):1301-1310.

Benkard, C.L. 2000. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. American Economic Review 90(4):1034-1054.

Best Energy Investment. n.d. Renewable energy could be the largest source of electricity by 2050. Renewable energy market facts. http://www.besterenergycapital.com/enegyfact.php.

Biello, D. 2014. Can carbon capture technology be part of the climate solution. Yale e360, September 8. http://e360.yale.edu/feature/can_carbon_capture_technology_be_part_of_the_climate_solution/2800.

BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2005. Consumer Price Index detailed reports. Annual Average Indexes 2005. Table 1A. Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): U.S. city average, by expenditure category and commodity and service group. Washington, DC: BLS.

BLS. 2007. Consumer Price Index detailed reports. Annual Average Indexes 2007. Table 1A. Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U):

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

U.S. city average, by expenditure category and commodity and service group. Washington, DC: BLS.

BNEF (Bloomberg New Energy Finance). 2014a. Global trends in renewable energy investment 2014. http://fs-unep-centre.org/system/files/globaltrendsreport2014.pdf.

BNEF. 2014b. Sustainable energy in America 2014 factbook. Bloomberg New Energy Finance, February 5. http://about.bnef.com/white-papers/sustainable-energy-in-america-2014-factbook.

BNEF. 2015. Wind and solar boost cost-competitiveness versus fossil fuels. Press release, October 5. http://about.bnef.com/press-releases/wind-solar-boost-cost-competitiveness-versus-fossil-fuels.

BNEF. 2016. 2016 sustainable energy in America factbook. Bloomberg New Energy Finance, February 4. http://about.bnef.com/white-papers/sustainable-energy-in-america-2016-factbook (accessed July 29, 2016).

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2012. Industrial production and capacity utilization. Release date August 15. http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/20120815.

Böhringer, C., A. Cuntz, D. Harhoff, and E.A. Otoo. 2014. The impacts of feed-in tariffs on innovation: Empirical evidence from Germany. CESifo working paper no. 4680. http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/DocBase_Content/WP/WP-CESifo_Working_Papers/wp-cesifo-2014/wp-cesifo-2014-03/cesifo1_wp4680.pdf.

Bollinger, M., and J. Seel. 2015. Utility-Scale Solar 2014: An empirical analysis of project cost, performance, and pricing trends in the United States. LBNL-1000917. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Bonbright, J., A. Danielsen, and D. Kamerschen. 1961. Principles of public utility rates (1st ed.). Arlington, VA: Public Utilities Reports.

Bonneville Power Administration. n.d. History. https://www.bpa.gov/news/AboutUs/History/Pages/default.aspx.

Boomhower, J., and L.W. Davis. 2014. A credible approach for measuring inframarginal participation in energy efficiency programs. Journal of Public Economics 113:67-79.

Borenstein, S. 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1):67-92.

Borenstein, S. 2014. Money for nothing? Energy Institute at Haas, May 12. https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/money-for-nothing (accessed June 29, 2016).

Bosseboeuf, D., and C. Richard. 1997. The need to link energy efficiency indicators to related policies. Energy Policy 25(7-9):813-823.

BP. 2014. BP Energy Outlook 2035. http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/energy-outlook-2016/bp-energy-outlook-2014.pdf.

Breakthrough Energy Coalition. n.d. Introducing the breakthrough energy coalition. http://www.breakthroughenergycoalition.com/en/index.html.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Bresler, S., P. Centolella, S. Covino, and P. Sotkiewicz. 2013. Smarter demand response in RTO markets: The evolution toward price responsive demand in PJM. In Energy efficiency: Towards the end of demand growth, edited by F.P. Sioshansi. Waltham, MA: Academic Press. Pp. 419-442.

Bresnahan, T., and M. Trajtenberg. 1992. General purpose technologies: “Engines of growth?” Working paper 4148. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Broderick, J. 2007. CFLs in America: Lessons learned on the way to market. LD+A Magazine, July. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/cfls_july_lessons.pdf.

Brounen, D., and N. Kok. 2011. On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62:166-179.

Brunt, L., J. Lerner, and T. Nicholas. 2011. Inducement prizes and innovation. Discussion paper. Bergen, Norway: Norwegian School of Economics.

Buongiorno, J., J. Jurewicz, M. Golay, and N. Todreas. 2015. Light-water reactors on offshore floating platforms: Scalable and economic nuclear energy. Paper 15366. Proceedings of ICAPP ‘15, Nice, France, May 3-6.

C2ES (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions). 2013. Leveraging natural gas to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. http://www.c2es.org/publications/leveraging-natural-gas-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed December 18, 2014).

California Energy Commission. 2012. California energy demand 2012-2022 final forecast (Vol. 1). http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/CEC-200-2012-001/CEC-200-2012-001-SF-V1.pdf.

California Energy Commission. 2016. Research & development: The science of innovation. http://www.energy.ca.gov/research (accessed June 29, 2016).

California ISO (Independent System Operator). 2013. What the duck curve tells us about managing a green grid. Folsom, CA: California ISO.

Campbell, R. 2012. Weather-related power outages and electric system resiliency. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Cappers, P., C.A. Spurlock, A. Todd, P. Baylis, M. Fowlie, and C. Wolfram. 2016. Time-of-use as a default rate for residential customers: Issues and insights (smart grid investment grant-consumer behavior study analysis). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

CBO (Congressional Budget Office). 2009. Potential impacts of climate change in the United States. Washington, DC: CBO.

CBO. 2015. Using ESPCs to finance federal investment in energy-efficient equipment. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/49869.

CCSP (Climate Change Science Program). 2007. Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations. Synthesis and assessment product 2.1a. Washington, DC: CCSP. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=usdoepub.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

CEER (Council of European Energy Regulators). 2012. 5th CEER benchmarking report on the quality of electricity supply 2011. https://www.energy-community.org/pls/portal/docs/1522177.PDF (accessed June 29, 2016).

Census Bureau. 2014. 2014 American Community Survey. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.

Centolella, P. 2012. A pricing strategy for a lean and agile electric power industry. Electricity Policy, September. http://www.electricitypolicy.com/images/pdf/Centolella%20-9-26-12-final.pdf.

Centolella, P., and M. McGranahan. 2013. Understanding the value of uninterrupted service. Proceedings of the CIGRE 2013 Grid of the Future Symposium, Boston, Massachusetts, October 21.

Centolella, P., and A. Ott. 2009. The integration of price responsive demand into PJM wholesale power markets and system operations. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/hepg/Papers/2009/Centolella%20%20Ott%20PJM%20PRD%2003092009.pdf.

Chen, K. 2012. Overview of Chinese Academy of Sciences thorium molten salt reactor licensing strategy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley.

Chitnis, M., and S. Sorrell. 2015. Living up to expectations: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Economics 52(Suppl. 1):100-116.

Chittum, A., and T. Sullivan. 2012. Coal retirements and the CHP investment opportunity. Report no. IE123. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). http://aceee.org/research-report/ie123.

CIER (Center for Integrative Environmental Research). 2007. The US economic impacts of climate change and the costs of inaction: A review and assessment by the Center for Integrative Environmental Research at the University of Maryland. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.

City Energy Project. 2014. The CEP theory of change & the data revolution. https://ifmt.app.box.com/s/grhiejemeij2ptq7j54yvijf7dx2rmmz.

Clarke, L., J. Weyant, and A. Birky. 2006. On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence. Energy Economics 28(5-6):579-595.

Clarke, L., J. Weyant, and J. Edmonds. 2008. On the sources of technological change: What do the models assume? Energy Economics 30(2):409-424.

Clarke, L., J. Edmonds, V. Krey, R. Richels, S. Rose, and M. Tavoni. 2009. International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 international scenarios. Energy Economics 31:S64-S81.

Clarke, L., A. Fawcett, J. McFarland, J. Weyant, Y. Zhou, and V. Chaturvedi. 2014. Technology and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results of the EMF 24 modeling exercise. The Energy Journal 35, Special Issue.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

CLASP (Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program). 2005. A multi-country comparative evaluation of labelling research. http://clasponline.org/en/Resources/Resources/PublicationLibrary/2005/Multi-country-comparative-eval-of-labeling-research.aspx.

Clean Edge. 2014. Clean energy trends 2014. http://cleanedge.com/reports/Clean-Energy-Trends-2014.

CNA Military Advisory Board. 2007. National security and the threat of climate change. Alexandria, VA: CNA Corporation. https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/National%20Security%20and%20the%20Threat%20of%20Climate%20Change.pdf.

CNA Military Advisory Board. 2014. National security and the accelerating risks of climate change. Alexandria, VA: CNA Corporation. https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/MAB_5-8-14.pdf.

Compete Coalition. 2014. Annual baseline assessment of choice in Canada and the United States. http://www.competecoalition.com/files/ABACCUS-2014-Executive-Summary-vf.pdf (accessed June 29, 2016).

Conchado, A., and Linares, P. 2012. The economic impact of demand-response programs on power systems: A survey of the state of the art. In Handbook of networks in power systems, edited by A. Sorokin, S. Rebennack, P.M. Pardalos, N.A. Iliadis, and M.V.F. Pereira. Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag.

Constable, G., and B. Somerville. 2003. A century of innovation: Twenty engineering achievements that transformed our lives. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

Cossent, R., and T. Gómez. 2013. Implementing incentive compatible menu of contracts to regulate electricity distribution investments. Utilities Policy 27:28-38.

Cossent, R., L. Olmos, T. Gómez, C. Mateo, and P. Frías. 2011. Distribution network costs under different penetration levels of distributed generation. European Transactions on Electrical Power 21(6):1869-1888.

Costello, K. 2009. How should regulators view cost trackers. The Electricity Journal 22(10):20-33.

Cullenward, D. 2014. Leakage in California’s carbon market: Preliminary trading is consistent with expected impacts of regulatory changes. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2458773.

Curtright, A., and J. Apt. 2008. The character of power output from utility-scale photovoltaic systems. Progress in Photovoltaics 16(3):241-247.

Dalberg Global Development Advisors. 2013. The advance market commitment for pneumococcal vaccines. http://www.gavi.org/results/evaluations/pneumococcal-amc-process---design-evaluation.

Dale, L.L., C. Antinori, M.A. McNeil, J.E. McMahon, and S.K. Fujita. 2009. Retrospective evaluation of appliance price trends. Energy Policy 37(2):597-605.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Darr, E.D., L. Argote, and D. Epple. 1995. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Science 41(11):1750-1762.

Davis, L.W. 2008. Durable goods and residential demand for energy and water: Evidence from a field trial. RAND Journal of Economics 39(2):530-546.

Davis, L.W. 2010. Evaluating the slow adoption of energy efficient investments: Are renters less likely to have energy efficient appliances? In The design and implementation of U.S. climate policy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Davis, L.W., and J. Davis. 2004. How effective are prizes as incentives to innovation? Evidence from three 20th century contests. Presented at DRUID Summer Conference 2004, Elsinore, Denmark, June 14-16.

Davis, L.W., and G.E. Metcalf. 2014. Does better information lead to better choices? Evidence from energy-efficiency labels. http://works.bepress.com/gilbert_metcalf/111.

Davis, L.W., A. Fuchs, and P.J. Gertler. 2014. Cash for coolers: Evaluating a large-scale appliance replacement program in Mexico. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(4):207-238.

de Figueiredi, M.A., D.M. Reiner, and H.J. Herzog. 2005. Framing the long-term in-situability issue for geologic carbon storage in the United States. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10:547-657.

Defense Science Board Task Force. 2011. Trends and implications of climate change for national and international security. Washington, DC: Defense Science Board. http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA552760.pdf.

Dell, M., B.F. Jones, and B.A. Olken. 2012. Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(3):66-95.

Dell, M., B.F. Jones, and B.A. Olken. 2014. What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. Journal of Economic Literature 52(3):740-798.

Deutch, J.M. 2011. An energy technology corporation will improve the federal government’s efforts to accelerate energy innovation. Discussion paper 2011-05. http://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/legacy/files/downloads_and_links/05_energy_corporation_deutch_paper_1.pdf.

DHS (Department of Homeland Security). 2013. Incident response activity. ICS-CERT Monitor, April-June. https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/Monitors/ICS-CERT_Monitor_Apr-Jun2013.pdf.

Dlouhy, J.A. 2013. Utility executives: Major cyberattack on power grid is inevitable. Fuel Fix, August 6. http://fuelfix.com/blog/2013/08/06/utility-executives-major-cyberattack-on-power-grid-is-inevitable.

DoD (Department of Defense). 2014. Quadrennial defense review 2014. Washington, DC: DoD. http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

DOE (Department of Energy). 2010. Public benefit funds: Increasing renewable energy and industrial energy efficiency opportunities. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/states/pdfs/publicbenefitfunds.pdf.

DOE. 2011a. Buildings energy data book. Washington, DC: DOE.

DOE. 2011b. Innovation ecosystem development initiative. Washington, DC: DOE.

DOE. 2012a. Application of automated controls for voltage and reactive power management—initial results. https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/VVO_Report_-_Final.pdf.

DOE. 2012b. Demand reductions from the application of advanced metering infrastructure, pricing programs, and customer-based systems—initial results. https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/peak_demand_report_final_12-13-2012.pdf.

DOE. 2012c. Reliability improvements from the application of distribution automation technologies—initial results. https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/Distribution_Reliability_Report_-_Final.pdf.

DOE. 2013. U.S. energy sector vulnerabilities to climate change and extreme weather. Washington, DC: DOE.

DOE. 2014a. AEO2014 early release overview. http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/gasregulation/authorizations/2013_applications/sc_exhibts_13_116_118/Ex._109_-_AEO_2014_Early_Release_Overvie.pdf.

DOE. 2014b. Energy conservation standards activities report to Congress. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/02/f7/2014_feb_report_to_congress.pdf.

DOE. 2014c. Energy Department invests $3.2 million to support clean energy small businesses and entrepreneurs. http://energy.gov/articles/energy-department-invests-32-million-support-clean-energy-small-businesses-and (accessed June 20, 2014).

DOE. 2014d. 2014 SunShot Initiative portfolio book: Tackling challenges in solar energy. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/08/f18/2014_SunShot_Initiative_Portfolio8.13.14.pdf.

DOE. 2015a. Net metering policies as of March 2015. DSIRE (Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency. http://www.dsireusa.org/resources/detailed-summary-maps/net-metering-policies-2 (accessed July 26, 2016).

DOE. 2015b. Quadrennial technology review 2015. Washington, DC: DOE.

DOE. 2015c. Quadrennial technology review: An assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/09/f26/Quadrennial-Technology-Review-2015_0.pdf.

DOE. 2016a. On the path to SunShot: Executive Summary. DOE/EE 1412. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/05/f31/OTPSS%20%20Executive%20Summary-508.pdf (accessed July 23, 2016).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

DOE. 2016b. Energy Department announces up to $70 million for new REMADE in America Institute. http://energy.gov/eere/articles/energy-department-announces-70-million-new-remade-america-institute.

DOE. n.d.-a. Buildings energy data book. http://buildingsdatabook.eren.doe.gov/TableView.aspx?table=1.4.1.

DOE. n.d.-b. History and impacts. http://energy.gov/eere/buildings/history-and-impacts.

DOE. n.d.-c. Renewable electricity production tax credit (PTC). http://energy.gov/savings/renewable-electricity-production-tax-credit-ptc (accessed August 9, 2016).

DOE and EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Combined heat and power: A clean energy solution. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/distributedenergy/pdfs/chp_clean_energy_solution.pdf.

DOE EAC (Electricity Advisory Committee). 2012. Recommendations on electricity workforce. Memorandum. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/EAC%20Paper%20-%20Recommendations%20on%20Electricity%20Workforce%20-%20Final%20-%208%20Nov%202012.pdf.

DOE EAC. 2014a. EAC recommendations regarding emerging and alternative regulatory models and modeling tools to assist in analysis (September 2014). http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/10/f18/Recs-EmergAltRegModels-Tools.pdf.

DOE EAC. 2014b. Status and recommendations for electricity delivery workforce. Memorandum. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/10/f18/Status-Recs-ElectricityDeliveryWorkforce-Sep2014.pdf.

Domingo, C., T. Gomez San Roman, A. Sanchez-Miralles, J. Pascual Peco Gonzalez, and A. Candela. 2011. A reference network model for large-scale distribution planning with automatic street map generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 26(1).

DSIRE (Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency). 2016. Renewable portfolio standard policies. http://www.dsireusa.org/resources/detailed-summary-maps (accessed August 3, 2016).

Dubin, J., A. Miedema, and R. Chandran. 1986. Price effects of energy-efficient technologies: A study of residential demand for heating and cooling. RAND Journal of Economics 17(3):310-325.

Dumagan, J.C., and T.D. Mount. 1993. Welfare effects of improving end-use efficiency: Theory and application to residential electricity demand. Resource and Energy Economics 15(2):175-201.

EDA (Economic Development Administration). 2011. U.S. Commerce Department announces launch of i6 green challenge to promote clean energy innovation and economic growth. Press release. Newsroom, March 10. https://www.eda.gov/news/press-releases/2011/03/10/303.htm.

EEI (Edison Electric Institute). 2014. 2013 financial review: Annual report of the U.S. investor-owned electric utility industry. http://www.eei.org/

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

resourcesandmedia/industrydataanalysis/industryfinancialanalysis/finreview/Documents/FinancialReview_2013.pdf.

EEI. 2016. 2016 Q1 credit ratings. http://www.eei.org/Search/Pages/Results.aspx?k=credit%20ratings&r=write%3E%3D%221%2F25%2F2016%22 (accessed July 26, 2016).

EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2007. State electricity profiles 2005. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/archive/062905.pdf.

EIA. 2009a. Energy market and economic impacts of HR 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. SR-OIAF/2009-05. http://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/2009/hr2454/pdf/sroiaf(2009)05.pdf.

EIA. 2009b. 2009 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/#sf?src=‹ Consumption Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS)-b1.

EIA. 2010. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey, 2010. Washington, DC: EIA.

EIA. 2011. Direct federal financial interventions and subsidies in energy in fiscal year 2010. Washington, DC: EIA. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/archive/2010/pdf/subsidy.pdf.

EIA. 2012. Annual Energy Outlook 2012. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2012).pdf.

EIA. 2013a. Electric Power Annual 2012. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/archive/03482012.pdf.

EIA. 2013b. Heating and cooling no longer majority of U.S. home energy use. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=10271.

EIA. 2013c. International Energy Outlook 2013. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo13/pdf/0484(2013).pdf.

EIA. 2013d. Updated capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/capitalcost/pdf/updated_capcost.pdf.

EIA. 2014a. Annual Energy Outlook 2014. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf.

EIA. 2014b. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2014. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/assumptions/pdf/0554(2014).pdf.

EIA. 2014c. California continues to set daily records for utility scale solar energy. Today in Energy, June 25. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=16851 (accessed July 25, 2016).

EIA. 2014d. Carbon dioxide emission coefficients by fuel. http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.cfm (accessed December 19, 2014).

EIA. 2014e. Electric Power Annual 2014. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual.

EIA. 2014f. Electric Power Monthly. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a (accessed December 2014).

EIA. 2014g. LED bulb efficiency expected to continue improving as cost decline. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=15471.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

EIA. 2014h. Levelized cost and levelized avoided cost of new generation resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2014. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf.

EIA. 2014i. Natural gas, solar, and wind lead power plant capacity additions in first-half 2014. Today in Energy, September 9. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=17891 (accessed June 28, 2016).

EIA. 2014j. Short-term energy outlook. Washington, DC: EIA.

EIA. 2015a. Annual Energy Outlook 2015. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2015).pdf.

EIA. 2015b. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2015. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/assumptions/pdf/0554(2015).pdf.

EIA. 2015c. Direct federal financial interventions and subsidies in energy in fiscal year 2013. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/requests/subsidy/pdf/subsidy.pdf.

EIA. 2015d. Hawaii and Vermont set high renewable portfolio standard targets. Today in Energy, June 29. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=21852 (accessed August 9, 2016).

EIA. 2015e. January 2015: Monthly energy review. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/archive/00351501.pdf (accessed July 22, 2016).

EIA. 2015f. Levelized cost and levelized avoided cost of new generation resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2015. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf.

EIA. 2015g. Monthly Energy Review: 2015 data as of July 2016. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly.

EIA. 2016a. Annual Energy Outlook 2016. Washington, DC: EIA. https://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/index.cfm.

EIA. 2016b. Chapter 7. Industrial sector energy consumption. In International Energy Outlook 2016. DOE/EIA-0484. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/industrial.cfm (accessed July 29, 2016).

EIA. 2016c. Demand trends, prices, and policies drive recent electric generation capacity additions. Today in Energy, March 18. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=25432 (accessed July 27, 2016).

EIA. 2016d. Electric Power Annual 2014. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/pdf/epa.pdf.

EIA. 2016e. Electric Power Monthly with data for May 2016. Washington, DC: EIA. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/pdf/epm.pdf.

EIA. 2016f. Extended policies case. In Annual Energy Outlook 2016: Issues in Focus, by M. Bowman, E. Boedecker, J. Maples, and K. Perl. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/policies.cfm.

EIA. 2016g. Levelized cost and levelized avoided cost of new generation resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf (accessed August 9, 2016).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

EIA. 2016h. Total U.S. electricity sales projected to grow slowly as electricity intensity declines. Today in Energy, June 15. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=26672.

EIA. 2016i. Wind adds the most electric generation capacity in 2015, followed by natural gas and solar. Today in Energy, March 23. http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=25492 (accessed July 25, 2016).

ELCON (Electric Consumers Resource Council). 2004. The economic impacts of the August 2003 blackout. http://www.elcon.org/Documents/Profiles%20and%20Publications/Economic%20Impacts%20of%20August%202003%20Blackout.pdf.

ELI (Environmental Law Institute). 2009. Estimating U.S. government subisidies to energy sources: 2002-2008. Washington, DC: ELI. https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/d19_07.pdf.

ELI. 2013. Estimating U.S. government spending on coal: 2002-2010. Washington, DC: ELI. https://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/d23-10.pdf.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2015. National emissions inventory air pollutant emissions trends data, 1970-2014 Average annual emissions, all criteria—February 6. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/air-pollutant-emissions-trends-data (accessed July 26, 2016).

EPA. 2016. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2014. Washington, DC: EPA.

EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2011. Estimating the costs and benefits of the Smart Grid: A preliminary estimate of the investment requirements and the resultant benefits of a fully functioning Smart Grid. https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/Estimating_Costs_Benefits_Smart_Grid_Preliminary_Estimate_In_201103.pdf.

EPRI. 2012. Volt-VAR control for electric distribution systems. Briefing presented for the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, January 18. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.

EPRI. 2013. Enhancing distribution resiliency: Opportunities for applying innovative technologies. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI.

EPRI. 2014. The integrated grid: Realizing the full value of central and distributed energy resources. http://www.epri.com/Press-Releases/Pages/EPRI-Unveils-Study-on-the-Integrated-Electric-Grid-.aspx (accessed June 29, 2016).

Eto, J., and K. LaCommare. 2008. Tracking the reliability of the U.S. electric power system: An assessment of publicly available information reported to state public utility commissions. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl1092e.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Executive Office of the President. 2013. Economic benefits of increasing electric grid resilience to weather outages. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/08/f2/Grid%20Resiliency%20Report_FINAL.pdf.

Faruqui, A. 2013. Surviving sub-one-percent growth. Electricity Policy, June. http://www.electricitypolicy.com/images/2013/06/Faruqui/Faruqui-1percent-6-11-13%202.pdf.

Faruqui, A., and J. Palmer. 2012. The discovery of price responsiveness—a survey of experiments involving dynamic pricing of electricity. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/hepg/Papers/2012/The%20Arc%20of%20Price%20Responsiveness%20(03-18-12).pdf.

Faruqui, A., S. Sergici, and A. Sharif. 2010. The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption. A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy 35(4):1598-1608.

Fawcett, A.A., K.V. Calvin, F.C. de la Chesnaye, J.M. Reilly, and J.P. Weyant. 2009. Overview of EMF 22 U.S. transition scenarios. Energy Economics 31(Suppl. 2):S198-S211.

Fawcett, A.A., L. Clarke, S. Rausch, and J. Weyant. 2013. Overview of EMF 24 policy scenarios. The Energy Journal 35.

Fehrenbacher, K. 2014. SolarCity breaks ground on huge solar factory in New York, strikes deal with state. GIGAOM, September 24. https://gigaom.com/2014/09/24/solarcity-breaks-ground-on-huge-solar-factory-in-new-york-strikes-deal-with-state.

FEMP (Federal Energy Management Program). n.d. Energy-efficient product procurement. http://energy.gov/eere/femp/energy-efficient-productprocurement.

FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). 2013. Assessment of demand response and advanced metering: Staff report. http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2013/oct-demand-response.pdf.

FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). n.d. Monthly report of cost and quality of fuels for electric plants (Form 423). Washington, DC: FERC.

Fischer, C. 2010. Renewable portfolio standards: When do they lower energy prices? The Energy Journal 31(1):101-119.

Fischer, C., and R. Newell. 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55:142-162.

Fischer, C., and L. Preonas. 2010. Combining policies for renewable energy: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 4:51-92.

Fischer, C., R. Newell, and L. Preonas. 2013. Environmental and technology policy options in the electricity sector: Interactions and outcomes. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. http://www.rff.org/Publications/Pages/PublicationDetails.aspx?PublicationID=22362.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Forsberg, C., D. Curtis, J. Stempien, R. MacDonald, and P. Peterson. 2014. Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) commercial basis and commercialization strategy: A Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) with a Nuclear Air-Brayton Combine Cycle (NACC) and firebrick resistance-heated energy storage. MIT-ANP-TR-153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems.

Fowlie, M., M. Greenstone, and C. Wolfram. 2015. Do energy efficiency investments deliver? Evidence from the Weatherization Assistance Program. https://nature.berkeley.edu/~fowlie/WAP.pdf.

Fox-Penner, P. 2010. Smart power: Climate change, the smart grid, and the future of electric utilities (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Fox-Penner, P. 2014. Smart power aniversary edition: Climate change, the smart grid, and the future of electric utilities (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Frondel, M., and C. Vance. 2012. Heterogeneity in the effect of home energy audits. Theory and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 55(3):407-418.

FTC (Federal Trade Commission). n.d. EnergyGuide labeling: FAQs for appliance manufacturers. http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/bus-82-energyguide-labels-faqs#products.

Gallagher, K.S., A. Grübler, L. Kuhl, G. Nemet, and C. Wilson. 2012. The energy technology innovation system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37(1):137-162.

Gans, W., A. Alberini, and A. Longo. 2013. Smart meter devices and the effect of feedback on residential electricity consumption: Evidence from a natural experiment in Northern Ireland. Energy Economics 36:729-743.

GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2010. Energy Star program: Covert testing shows the Energy Star program certification process is vulnerable to fraud and abuse. GAO-10-470. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013. Coal leasing- BLM could enhance appraisal process, more explicitly consider coal exports, and provide more public information. Washington, DC: GAO. http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/659801.pdf.

GAO. 2014. Advanced reactor research: DOE supports multiple technologies, but actions needed to ensure a prototype is built. GAO-14-545. Washington, DC: GAO.

Garnett, A., C. Greig, and M. Oettinger. 2014. Zerogen IGCC with CCS: A case history. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. https://energy.uq.edu.au/files/1084/ZeroGen.pdf.

Garvey, T. 2009. The Yucca Mountain litigation: Breach of contract under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Gayer, T., and W. K. Viscusi. 2013. Overriding consumer preferences with energy. Journal of Regulatory Economics 43:248-264.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Geller, H., and S. Attali. 2005. The experience with energy efficiency policies and programmes in IEA countries: Learning from the critics. Paris, France: IEA. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/IEAEnergyPolicies_Learning_from_critics.pdf.

Generac. 2014. 2013 annual report. Waukesha, WI: Generac.

Gillingham, K., and K. Palmer. 2014. Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Policy insights from economic theory and empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8(1):18-38.

Gillingham, K., and J. Sweeney. 2010. Market failure and the structure of externalities. In Harnessing renewable energy in electric power systems: Theory, practice, policy, edited by B. Moselle, J. Padilla, and R. Schmalensee. Washington, DC: RFF Press. Pp. 69-91.

Gillingham, K., R. Newell, and K. Palmer. 2004. Retrospective examination of demand-side energy efficiency policies. Discussion paper 04-19. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Gillingham, K., R. Newell, and K. Palmer. 2006. Energy efficiency policies: A retrospective examination. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:161-192.

Gillingham, K., R. Newell, and K. Palmer. 2009. Energy efficiency economics and policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1(1):597-619.

Gillingham, K., M. Harding, and D. Rapson. 2012. Split incentives in residential energy consumption. The Energy Journal 33(2):37-62.

Gillingham, K., D. Rapson, and G. Wagner. 2015. The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10(1):68-88.

Gilmore, E., and L. Lave. 2007. Increasing backup generation capacity and system reliability by selling electricity during periods of peak demand. Presented at 26th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, September 16-19. http://www.usaee.org/usaee2007/submissions/Presentations/Elisabeth%20Gilmore.pdf.

Global CCS Institute. 2016. Large-scale CCS projects database. http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects (accessed August 5, 2016).

Goellner, J., M. Prica, J. Miller, S. Pullins, J. Westerman, J. Harmon, T. Grabowski, H. Weller, B. Renz, S. Knudsen, and D. Cohen. 2011. Demand dispatch: Intelligent demand for a more efficient grid. Washington, DC: DOE. https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Efficiency/smart%20grid/DemandDispatch_08112011.pdf.

Gosnell, G.K., J.A. List, and R. Metcalfe. 2016. A new approach to an age-old problem: Solving externalities by incenting workers directly. Working paper no. 22316. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Goulder, L., and S. Schneider. 1999. Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics 21:211-253.

Greenstone, M., and A. Looney. 2012. Paying too much for energy? The true costs of our energy choices. Dædalus 141(2):10-30.

Grubb, M., N. Haj-Hasan, and D. Newbery. 2008. Accelerating innovation and strategic deployment in UK electricity: Applications to renewable energy. In Delivering a low-carbon electricity system: Technologies, economics and policy, edited by M. Grubb, T. Jamasb, and M. Pollitt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hardcastle, A. 2008. Workforce challenges of electric sector employers in Washington and Oregon. Olympia, WA: Washington State University Extension Energy Program. http://www.energy.wsu.edu/Documents/WSU_Workforce_Challenges_Final_Report_090311.pdf.

Harrington W., and R.D. Morgenstern. 2004. Economic incentives versus command and control- what’s the best approach for solving environmental problems? Resources (Fall/Winter):13-17. http://www.rff.org/files/sharepoint/WorkImages/Download/RFF_Resources_152_ecoincentives.pdf.

Heal, G., and H. Kunreuther. 2010. Environment and energy: Catastrophic liabilities from nuclear power plants. In Measuring and managing federal financial risk, edited by D. Lucas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 235-260.

Heeter, J., and L. Bird. 2012. Including alternative resources in state renewable portfolio standards: Current design and implementation experience. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/55979.pdf.

Heeter, J., G. Barbose, L. Bird, S. Weaver, F. Flores-Espino, K. Kuskova-Burns, and R. Wiser. 2014. A survey of state-level cost and benefit estimates of renewable portfolio standards. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/61042.pdf.

Hejzlar, P. 2013. Terrapower traveling wave reactor development program overview. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 45(6):731-744.

Hines, P., J. Apt, and S. Talukdar. 2009. Large blackouts in North America: Historical trends and policy implications. Energy Policy 37(12):5249-5259.

Horowitz, M.J., and H. Haeri. 1990. Economic efficiency vs. energy efficiency. Energy Economics 122-131.

Houde, S. 2014. How consumers respond to environmental certification and the value of energy information. Working paper 20019. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Houde, S., and J.E. Aldy. 2014. Belt and suspenders and more: The incremental impact of energy efficiency subsidies in the presence of existing policy instruments. Working paper 20541. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Houde, S., and A. Spurlock. 2015. Do energy efficiency standards improve quality? Evidence from a revealed preference approach. Working paper. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.

Houde, S., A. Todd, A. Sudarshan, J. Flora, and K. Armel. 2013. Real-time feedback and electricity consumption: A field experiment assessing the potential for savings and persistence. Energy Journal 34(1):87-102.

Howell, S. 2015. Financing constraints as barriers to innovation: Evidence for R&D grants to energy startups. http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/howell_innovation_finance_jmp_jan7.pdf.

Hudson, F. 2012. Sustainability on a smarter planet. Presented at TEDx, April. http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/TEDxNJIT-Florence-Hudson-Sustai.

Huntington, H.G. 2009. Structural change and U.S. energy use: Recent patterns. Stanford, CA: Energy Modeling Forum. https://web.stanford.edu/group/emf-research/docs/occasional_papers/op65.pdf.

IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2016. Nuclear power reactors in the world. Vienna, Austria: IAEA. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/RDS_2-36_web.pdf (accessed July 27, 2016).

IAEA. n.d. Small and medium sized reactors development, assessment, and deployment. http://www.iaea.org/NuclearPower/SMR.

IEA (International Energy Agency). 2012. World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris, France: IEA. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/weo2012.

IEA. 2013. Technology roadmap for carbon capture and storage. Paris, France: IEA.

IEA. 2014. World Energy Outlook 2014. Paris, France: IEA. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/weo2014.

IEE (Innovation Electricity Efficency). 2013. Utility-scale smart meter deployments: A foundation for expanded grid benefits. http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iee/Documents/IEE_SmartMeterUpdate_0813.pdf (accessed June 29, 2016).

IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). 2011. IEEE benchmarking 2011 results. Distribution Reliability Working Group Meeting, San Diego, CA, July 24. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/td/dist/sd/doc/2012-07-01-Benchmarking-Results-2011.pdf.

Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. 2013. Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis—under Executive Order 12866. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/social_cost_of_carbon_for_ria_2013_update.pdf.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate change 2007. Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: The physical sciences basis. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.climatechange2013.org.

IPCC. 2014a. Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/report.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

IPCC. 2014b. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3 (accessed December 16, 2015).

IRS (Internal Revenue Service). 2014. Internal Revenue Bulletin 2014-23. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-irbs/irb14-23.pdf.

IRS. n.d. Q&A on tax credits for Sections 25C and 25D, Notice 2013-70. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-13-70.pdf (accessed August 5, 2016).

Jackson, R., O.C. Onar, H. Kirkham, E. Fisher, K. Burkes, M. Starke, O. Mohammed, and G. Weeks. 2015. Opportunities for energy efficiency improvements in the U.S. electricity transmission and distribution system. ORNL/TM-2015/5. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Jacobsen, G.D., and M.J. Kotchen. 2013. Are building codes effective at saving energy? Evidence from residential billing data in Florida. The Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1):34-49.

Jaffe, A., and K. Palmer. 1997. Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. The Review of Economics and Statistics 79(4):610-619.

Jaffe, A., and R. Stavins. 1994. The energy-efficiency gap. What does it mean? Energy Policy 22(10):804-810.

Jaffe, A., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins. 2004. Economics of energy efficiency. Encyclopedia of Energy 2:79-90.

Jaffe, A., R. Newell, R. Stavins. 2005. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 54(2-3):164-174.

Jamasb, T. 2007. Technical change theory and learning curves: Patterns of progress in electricity generation technologies. The Energy Journal 28(3):51-72.

Jamasb, T., and J. Kohler. 2008. Learning curves for energy technology: A critical assessment. In Delivering a low carbon electricity system, edited by M. Grubb, T. Jamasb, and M. Pollitt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/194736.

Jamasb, T., and M. Pollitt. 2008. Reference models and incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: An evaluation of Sweden’s Network Performance Assessment Model (NPAM). Energy Policy 36(5):1788-1801.

Janeway, W. 2012. Doing capitalism in the innovation economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jenkins, C. 2011. RIIO Economics: Examining the economics underlying Ofgem’s new regulatory framework. Working paper. http://www.rpieurope.org/publications/2011/Jenkins_RIIO%20Economics_FSR%20working%20paper_130611.pdf.

Joint Committee on Taxation. 2014. Estimates of federal tax expenditures for fiscal years 2014-2018. Washington, DC: The Joint Committee on Taxation.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Jones, J., and M. Leff. (2014, April 28). Implications of accelerated power plant retirements. In Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/index.cfm (accessed January 20, 2015).

Joskow, P. 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. The American Economic Review 101(3):238-241. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29783746.

Junginger, M., P. Lako, S. Lensink, W. van Sark, and M. Weiss. 2008. Technological learning in the energy sector. Report 500102017, NWS-E-2008-14, ECN-E--08-034. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2008/e08034.pdf.

Junginger, M., W. van Sark, and A. Faaij (Eds.). 2010. Technological learning in the energy sector: Lessons for policy, industry and science. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Kahn, A.E. 1970. The economics of regulation (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kahn, A.E. 1971. The economics of regulation (Vol. 2). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kahn, M.E., N. Kok, and J.M. Quigley. 2013. Commercial building electricity consumption dynamics: The role of structure quality, human capital, and contract incentives. Working paper 18781. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kahouli-Brahmi, S. 2008. Technological learning in energy-environment economy modeling: A survey. Energy Policy 36(1):138-162.

Kay, L. 2011. Managing innovation prizes in government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

Kay, L. 2013. The effect of inducement prizes on innovation: Evidence from the Ansari XPrize and the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. R&D Management 41(4):360-377.

Kerber, T. n.d. Residential energy savings through data analytics. http://www.ecofactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ResidentialEnergy-Savings-through-Data-Analytics.pdf.zip (accessed June 29, 2016).

Ketels, C.H.M., and O. Memedovic. 2008. From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 1(3):375-392.

Kim, K.K., W. Lee, S. Choi, H.R. Kim, and J. Ha. 2014. SMART: The first licensed advanced integral reactor. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering 8(2014):94-102.

Kind, P. 2013. Disruptive challenges: Financial implications and strategic responses to a changing retail electric business. http://www.eei.org/ourissues/finance/documents/disruptivechallenges.pdf.

Kobos, P.H., J.D. Erickson, and T.E. Drennen. 2006. Technological learning and renewable energy costs: Implications for U.S. renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 34(13):1645-1658.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Kotchen, M.J. 2016. Longer-run evidence on whether building energy codes reduce residential energy consumption. http://environment.yale.edu/kotchen/pubs/codesLR.pdf.

Kremer, M. 1998. Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4):1137-1167.

Krey, V., G. Luderer, L. Clarke, and L. Kriegler. 2014. Getting from here to there—energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios. Climatic Change 123(3):369-382.

Kriegler, E., J.P. Weyant, G.J. Blanford, V. Krey, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, A. Fawcett, G. Luderer, K. Riahi, R. Richels, S.K. Rose, M. Tavoni, and D.P. van Vuuren. 2014. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change 123(3-4):353–367.

Laden, F., J. Schwartz, F.E. Speizer, and D.W. Dockery. 2006. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 173(6):667-672.

Lantz, E., R. Wiser, and M. Hand. 2012. IEA wind task 26: The past and future cost of wind energy. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Larsson, M.B.-O. 2005. The Network Performance Assessment Model: A new framework for regulating the electricity network companies. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology of Stockholm. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:8800/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Lave, L., M. Ashworth, and C. Gellings. 2007. The aging workforce: Electricity industry challenges and solutions. The Electricity Journal 20(2):71-80.

Lazard. 2015. Levelized cost of energy analysis 9.0. Lazard, November 17. https://www.lazard.com/perspective/levelized-cost-of-energy-analysis-90 (accessed July 29, 2016).

Lerner, J. 2009. Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed—and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Lerner. J. 2010. The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics 35(3):255-264.

Lester, R., and D. Hart. 2012. Unlocking energy innovation: How America can build a low-cost low-carbon energy system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lester, R.K., and D.M. Hart. 2015. Closing the energy demonstration gap. Issues in Science and Technology xxxi(2):48-54.

Levinson, A. 2014a. California energy efficiency: Lessons for the rest of the world, or not? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 107:269-289.

Levinson, A. 2014b. How much energy do building energy codes really save? Evidence from California. Working paper 20797. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Levinson, A. 2015. A direct estimate of the technique effect: Changes in the pollution intensity of U.S. manufacturing 1990-2008. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2(1):43-56.

Levitt, S.D., J.A. List, and C. Syverson. 2013. Toward an understanding of learning by doing: Evidence from an automobile assembly plant. Journal of Political Economy 121(4):643-681.

Lindman, Å., and P. Söderholm. 2012. Wind power learning rates: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Energy Economics 34(3):754-761.

Lockwood, M. 2013. Governance, innovation and the transition to a sustainable energy system: Perspectives from economic theory. http://projects.exeter.ac.uk/igov/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/WP5-Governance-Innovation-and-the-Transition-to-a-Sustainable-Energy-System-Perspecitves-from-Economic-Theory.pdf.

Lueken, R., and J. Apt. 2014. The effects of bulk electricity storage on the PJM market. Energy Systems 5(4):677-704.

Lyon, T., and Yin, H. 2009. Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards?: An empirical investigation. The Energy Journal 31(3):133-157.

Madison Park Group. n.d. Guide to venture capital. http://upload.madisonparkgrp.com/news/gtvc.pdf.

Malkin, D., and P. Centolella. 2014. Results-based regulation: A more dynamic approach to grid modernization. Fortnightly Magazine, March.

Malm, E. 1996. An actions-based estimate of the free rider fraction in electric utility DSM programs. The Energy Journal 17(3):41-48.

Mankins, J. 1995. Technology readiness levels—a white paper. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Manne, A., and R. Richels. 2004. The impact of learning-by-doing on the timing and costs of CO2 abatement. Energy Economics 26(4):603-619.

Marron, D., and E. Toder. 2014. Tax policy issues in designing a carbon tax. American Economic Review 104(5):563-568.

Martin, L., and J. Jones. 2016. Issues in focus: Effects of the clean power plan. In Annual Energy Outlook 2016. Washington, DC: EIA. http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/section_issues.cfm (accessed June 20, 2016).

Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. 2013. Massachusetts Electric Grid Modernization Stakeholder Working Group process: Report to the Department of Public Utilities from the Steering Committee. DPU 12-76. http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dpu/electric/grid-mod/ma-grid-modworking-group-report-07-02-2013.pdf.

Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities. 2014. Investigation by the Department of Public Utilities on its own Motion into Modernization of the Electric Grid. DPU 12-76-B. http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dpu/orders/dpu-12-76-b-order-6-12-2014.pdf.

Mathieu, J.L. 2012. Modeling, analysis, and control of demand response resources. LBNL-5544E. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Berkeley National Laboratory. https://eaei.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-5544e_0.pdf.

Mathieu, J.L., M. Dyson, and D.S. Callaway. 2012. Using residential electric loads for fast demand response: The potential resource and revenues, the costs, and policy recommendations. Proceedings of the 2012 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. http://aceee.org/files/proceedings/2012/data/papers/0193-000009.pdf.

Mauch, B., J. Apt, P.M. Carvallo, and M. Small. 2013. An effective method for modeling wind power forecast uncertainty. Energy Systems 4(4):393-417.

Mazzucato, M. 2011. The entrepreneurial state. RENEWAL: A Journal of Social Democracy 19(3/4).

McDermott, K. 2012. Cost of service regulation in the investor owned electric utility industry: A history of adaptation. http://www.eei.org/issuesandpolicy/stateregulation/documents/cosr_history_final.pdf.

McDonald, A., and L. Schrattenholzer. 2000. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29(4):255-261.

McKinsey & Company. 2009. “And the winner is...” Capturing the promise of philanthropic prizes. http://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Social-Innovation/And_the_winner_is.pdf.

Metcalf, G.E. 2008. An empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level. The Energy Journal 29(3):1-26. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Reprint08-8.pdf.

Metcalf, G.E., and K.A. Hassett. 1999. Measuring the energy savings from home improvement investments: Evidence from monthly billing data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 81(3):516-528.

METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) Agency for Natural Resources and Energy. 2010. Top Runner Program: Developing the world’s best energy-efficient appliances. http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/category/saving_and_new/saving/enterprise/overview/pdf/toprunner2011.03en-1103.pdf.

Meyers, R.J., E.D. Williams, and H.S. Matthews. 2010. Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in homes. Energy and Buildings 42:563-569.

Midwest ISO. 2010. Transmission Expansion Plan 2010. https://www.misoenergy.org/_layouts/MISO/ECM/Redirect.aspx?ID=19942.

Mills, E. 2011. Building commissioning: A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Energy Efficiency 4(2):145-173.

MISI (Management Information Services, Inc.). 2011. 60 years of energy incentives: Analysis of federal expenditures for energy development. Washington, DC: MISI. http://www.nei.org/corporatesite/media/filefolder/60_Years_of_Energy_Incentives_-_Analysis_of_Federal_Expenditures_for_Energy_Development_-_1950-2010.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2007. The future of coal. http://web.mit.edu/coal/The_Future_of_Coal.pdf (accessed August 1, 2016).

MIT. 2016. Carbon capture and sequestration project database. http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index.html (accessed July 20, 2016).

Montgomery, W., and A. Smith. 2007. Price, quantity, and technology strategies for climate change policy. In Human-induced climate change: An interdisciplinary assessment, edited by M.E. Schlesinger, H.S. Kheshg, J. Smith, F.C. de la Chesnaye, J.M. Reilly, T. Wilson, and C. Kolstad. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 328-342.

Morgan, M.G., and S.T. McCoy. 2012. Carbon capture and sequestration: Removing the legal and regulatory barriers. Washington, DC: RFF Press.

Muller, N.Z., R. Mendelsohn, and W. Nordhaus. 2011. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. The American Economic Review 101(5):1649-1675.

NACAP (North American Carbon Atlas Partnership). 2012. The North American Carbon Storage Atlas. https://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Carbon-Storage/NACSA2012.pdf.

Nadiri, M.I. 1993. Innovations and technological spillovers. http://www.nber.org.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/papers/w4423.pdf?new_window=1.

NAREIT (National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts). n.d.-a. Understanding the basics of REITs. https://www.reit.com/investing/reit-basics/faqs/basics-reits.

NAREIT. n.d.-b. U.S. REIT industry equity market cap, historical REIT industry market capitalization: 1972-2014. https://www.reit.com/data-research/data/us-reit-industry-equity-market-cap.

NAS (National Academy of Sciences), NAE (National Academy of Engineering), and NRC (National Research Council). 2010. Real prospects for energy efficiency in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nathan, S. 2013. PRISM project: A proposal for the UK’s problem plutonium, The Engineer, May 13.

NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute). 2015. Second license renewal roadmap. http://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/Federal-State-Local-Policy/Regulatory-Information/Second-License-Renewal-Roadmap-small.pdf?ext=.pdf.

NEI. 2016. Nuclear units under construction worldwide. http://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/WorldStatistics/Nuclear-Units-Under-Construction-Worldwide (accessed August 1, 2016).

Nemet, G.F. 2006. Beyond the learning curve: Factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics. Energy Policy 34(17):3218-3232.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Nemet, G.F. 2012. Subsidies for new technologies and knowledge spillovers from learning by doing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31(3):601-622.

Nemet, G.F., and Baker, E. 2008. Demand subsidies versus R&D: Comparing the uncertain impacts of policy on a pre-commercial low-carbon energy technology. La Follette School of Public Affairs Working Paper No. 2008-006. https://www.lafollette.wisc.edu/images/publications/workingpapers/nemet2008-006.pdf.

Nest Labs, Inc. 2013. Our first Rush Hour Rewards results. Inside Nest, July 18. https://nest.com/blog/2013/07/18/our-first-rush-hour-rewards-results (accessed June 29, 2016).

Nest Labs, Inc. 2014. Energy savings from Nest: The impact of Nest learning thermostat. https://nest.com/downloads/press/documents/efficiency-simulation-white-paper.pdf.

Net Power. 2014. Net Power announces launch of breakthrough clean power project. http://www.netpower.com/news-posts/net-power-announces-launch-of-breakthrough-clean-power-project (accessed December 12, 2014).

Neuhoff, K. 2008. Learning by doing with constrained growth rates: An application to energy technology policy. The Energy Journal 165-183. http://www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2008/11/eprg0809.pdf.

Neuhoff, K., and P. Twomey. 2008. Will the market choose the right technologies. In Delivering a low carbon electricity system: Technology, economics and policy, edited by M. Grubb, T. Jamasb, and M. Pollitt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 259-277.

New York State Department of Public Service. 2014. Reforming the energy vision: NYS Department of Public Service staff report and proposal. Case no. 14-M-0101. http://www3.dps.ny.gov/W/PSCWeb.nsf/96f0fec0b45a3c6485257688006a701a/26be8a93967e604785257cc40066b91a/$FILE/ATTK0J3L.pdf/Reforming%20The%20Energy%20Vision%20(REV)%20REPORT%204.25.%2014.pdf.

Newell, R., and N. Wilson. 2005. Technology prizes for climate change mitigation. Discussion paper 05-33. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Newell, R.G., A.B. Jaffe, and R.N. Stavins. 1999. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 941-975.

Newell, R.G., and J. Siikamäki. 2013. Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels. RFF DP 13-17. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Newsham, G.R., S. Mancini, and B.J. Birt. 2009. Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but… Energy and Buildings 41(8):897-905.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Nicholas, T. 2011. What drives innovation? Antitrust Law Journal 77(3):787-809.

Nicholas, T. 2013. Hybrid innovation in Meiji, Japan. International Economic Review 54(2):575-600.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2014. NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 3.0. NIST special publication 1108r3. http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/upload/NIST-SP-1108r3.pdf.

Nordhaus, W. 2011. The economics of tail events with an application to climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(2):240-257.

Nordhaus, W. 2013. The climate casino: Risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nordhaus, W. 2014. The perils of the learning model for modeling endogenous technological change. The Energy Journal 35(1):1-13.

NRC (National Research Council). 1999. Concerning federally sponsored inducement prizes in engineering and science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2001. Effectiveness and impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC. 2007. Innovation inducement prizes at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010a. Electricity from renewable resources: Status, prospects, and impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010b. Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced consequences of energy production and use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010c. Limiting the magnitude of future climate change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010d. Modeling the economics of greenhouse gas mitigation: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2011. America’s climate choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012. Rising to the challenge: U.S. innovation policy for the global economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2013a. An assessment of the prospects for inertial fusion energy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2013b. Assessment of advanced solid-state lighting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2013c. Effects of U.S. tax policy on greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRECA (National Rural Electric Cooperative Association). 2016. Electric co-op fact sheet 2016. http://www.nreca.coop/about-electric-cooperatives/co-op-facts-figures/electric-co-op-fact-sheet-2016-03 (accessed July 25, 2016).

NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). 2012. Renewable Electricity Futures Study. http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/re_futures.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2010. U.S. businesses report 2008 worldwide R&D expense of $330 billion: Findings from new NSF survey. NSF 10-322. InfoBrief, May.

Nuclear Engineering International. 2014. B&W scales back small reactor development. NEI Magazine, April 15. http://www.neimagazine.com/news/newsbw-scales-back-small-reactor-development-4214703.

NuScale Power. 2013. NuScale Power modular and scalable reactor. https://aris.iaea.org/sites/..%5CPDF%5CNuScale.pdf.

Oates, D.L., and P. Jaramillo. 2013. Production cost and air emissions impact of coal cycling in power systems with large-scale wind penetration. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing Ltd.

Ofgem (Office of Gas and Electric Markets [United Kingdom]). 2010a. Handbook for implementing the RIIO model. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/51871/riiohandbook.pdf.

Ofgem. 2010b. RIIO: A new way to regulate energy networks: Final decision. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/51870/decision-doc.pdf.

Ofgem. 2013. Strategy decision for the RIIO-ED1 electricity distribution price control: Overview. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2013/03/riioed1decoverview.pdf.

Ofgem. 2014. Ofgem announces £46m of funding for eight innovation projects to improve Britain’s energy networks. Press Release, November 24. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publications-and-updates/ofgem-announces%C2%A346m-funding-eight-innovation-projects-improve-britain%E2%80%99s-energy-networks.

Ordowich, C., J. Chase, D. Steele, R. Malhotra, M. Harada, and K. Makino. 2012. Applying learning curves to modeling future coal and gas power generation technologies. Energy & Fuels 26(1):753-766.

PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy). n.d. PACE industry publications. http://www.pacenation.us/publications.

Pacific Economic Group. 2013. Alternative regulation for evolving utility challenges: An updated survey. http://www.eei.org/issuesandpolicy/stateregulation/Documents/innovative_regulation_survey.pdf.

Palmer, K.L., and D. Burtraw. 2005. The cost effectiveness of renewable electricity policies. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Palmer, K.L., and M.A. Walls. 2015. What homeowners say about home energy audits. Resources 188:34-39.

Palmer, K.L., R. Sweeney, and M. Allaire. 2010. Modeling policies to promote renewable and low-carbon sources of electricity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Palmer, K.L., M.A. Walls, H. Gordon, and T. Gerarden. 2013. Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: Results from a survey of home energy auditors. Energy Efficiency 6(2):271-292.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Palmer, K.L., M.A. Walls, and L. O’Keefe. 2015. Putting information into action: What explains follow-up on home energy audits? RFF DP 15-34. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Paltsev, S., J.M. Reilly, H.D. Jacoby, and J.F. Morris. 2009. The cost of climate policy in the United States. Energy Economics 31:S235-S243.

Parry, I., A. Morris, and R. Williams (Eds.). 2015. Implementing a U.S. carbon tax: Challenges and debates. New York: Routledge.

Passey, R., T. Spooner, I. Macgill, M. Watt, and K. Syngellakis. 2011. The potential impacts of grid-connected distributed generation and how to address them: A review of technical and non-technical factors. Energy Policy 39(10):6280-6290.

PCAST (President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology). 2010. Report to the President on accelerating the pace of change in energy technologies through an integrated federal energy policy. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcastenergy-tech-report.pdf.

Peters, M., M. Schneider, T. Griesshaber, and V.H. Hoffmann. 2011. The quest for adequate technology-push and demand-pull policies: Country-level spillovers and incentives for non-incremental innovation. Zurich, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.

Pfund, N., and B. Healey. 2011. What would Jefferson do? The historical role of federal subsidies in shaping America’s energy future. San Francisco, CA: DBL Investors. http://www.dblpartners.vc/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/What-Would-Jefferson-Do-2.4.pdf?597435&48d1ff.

Phillips, C.F., Jr. 1988. The regulation of public utilities. Arlington, VA: Public Utilities Reports.

Piette, M., J. Granderson, M. Wetter, and S. Kiliccote. 2012. Responsive and intelligent building information and control for low-energy and optimized grid integration. LBNL-5662E. http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/wetter/download/2012-acee-controls.pdf.

Pindyck, R. 2011. Fat tails, thin tails, and climate change policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(2):258-274.

PJM. 2009. Demand response in the PJM markets. Statement of Terry Boston, President and CEO, on behalf of the PJM board of managers, June 26. http://www.pjm.com/~/media/committees-groups/committees/mic/20100722/20100722-item-02b-statement-on-demand-response-in-the-pjmmarkets.ashx (accessed June 29, 2016).

Pope, C.A. III, M. Ezzati, and D.W. Dockery. 2009. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 360(4):376-386.

Popp, D., R.G. Newell, and A.B. Jaffe. 2010. Energy, the environment, and technological change. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2(10):873-937.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Porter, M.E. 2001. Clusters of innovation initiative: Regional foundations of U.S. competitiveness. http://www.compete.org/storage/images/uploads/File/PDF%20Files/CoC_Reg_Found_national_cluster.pdf.

Pritchard, G., and J. Evans. 2009. Using AMI for outage notification at PECO. Utility Automation & Engineering/T&D 14(4).

PSERC (Power Systems Engineering Research Center). 2016. Academic programs. http://pserc.wisc.edu/education/academic.aspx (accessed June 29, 2016).

Qiu, Y., and L.D. Anadon. 2012. The price of wind power in China during its expansion: Technology adoption, learning-by-doing, economies of scale, and manufacturing localization. Energy Economics 34(3):772-785.

Ramos, A, A. Gago, X. Labandeira, and P. Linares. 2015. The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. Energy Economics 52:S17-S29.

RAP (Regulatory Assistance Project). 2011. Electricity regulation in the United States: A guide. http://www.raponline.org/docs/RAP_Lazar_ElectricityRegulationInTheUS_Guide_2011_03.pdf (accessed June 29, 2016).

Rawls, J., Z. Johal, and J. Parmentola. 2014. Improving the economics and long-term sustainability of nuclear power. Energy Development Frontier 3(2):20-29.

Rocky Mountain Institute. 2013. e-Lab: New business models for the distribution edge. Boulder, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.

Rothwell, G.S. 2001. Does the US subsidize nuclear power insurance? Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

Rubin, E.S. 2005. The government role in technology innovation: Lessons for the climate change policy agenda. Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference on Transportation Energy and Environmental Policy: Toward a Policy Agenda for Climate Change, Pacific Grove, CA.

Rubin, E.S. 2014. Will cutting carbon kill coal? Only if the industry fails to adapt. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, November 24, p. E1.

Rubin, E.S., C. Chen, and A.B. Rao. 2007a. Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 35:4444-4454.

Rubin, E.S., S. Yeh, M. Antes, M. Berkenpas, and J. Davison. 2007b. Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 1(2):188-197.

Russell, B. 2010. Educating the Workforce for the modern electric power system university-industry collaboration. The Bridge on the Electricity Grid 40(1):35-41.

Ryan, L., S. Moarif, E. Levina, and R. Baron. 2011. Energy efficiency policy and carbon pricing. Working paper. Washington, DC: International Energy Agency.

Santen, N.R., and L.D. Anadon. 2014. Electricity technology investments under solar RD&D uncertainty: How interim learning and adaptation affect the optimal decision strategy. Discussion paper 2014-10. Cambridge, MA:

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/24874.

Santen, N.R., M.D., Webster, D. Popp, and I. Pérez-Arriaga. 2014. Inter-temporal R&D and capital investment portfolios for the electricity industry’s low carbon future. Working paper no. 20783. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w20783.

SBA (Small Business Administration). 2016a. About Startup America: StartUp America—Empowering America’s entrepreneurs. https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/sba-initiatives/startup-america/about-startup-america.

SBA. 2016b. Eligible impact investments. https://www.sba.gov/sbic/general-information/key-initiatives/impact-investment-fund/eligible-impactinvestments.

SBA. 2016c. Program overview. https://www.sba.gov/sbic/general-information/program-overview.

Schmalensee, R. 2013. The performance of U.S. wind and solar generating plants. Working paper 19509. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Schneider, K., J. Fuller, F. Tuffner, R. Singh, C. Bonebrake, N.P. Kumar, and B. Vyakaranam. 2012. Evaluation of representative Smart Grid investment grant project technologies: Summary report. PNNL-20892. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Schneider, S., and Goulder, L. 1997. Achieving carbon dioxide emissions reductions at low cost. Nature 389:13-14.

Schwienbacher, A. 2008. Innovation and venture capital exits. The Economic Journal 118(533):1888-1916.

Sekar, S., and B. Sohngen. 2014. The effects of renewable portfolio standards on carbon intensity in the United States. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Singleton, G., H. Herzog, and S. Ansolabehere. 2009. Public risk perspectives on the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3(1):100-107.

Sissine, F. 2014. Renewable energy R&D funding history. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Sissine, F. 2015. DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: FY2016 appropriations. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44004.pdf.

SmartGrid Consumer Collaborative. 2013. Smart Grid economic and environmental benefits: A review and synthesis of research on Smart Grid benefits and costs. http://smartgridcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/SGCC-Econ-and-Environ-Benefits-Full-Report.pdf.

Söderholm, P., and Sundqvist, T. 2007. Empirical challenges in the use of learning curves for assessing the economic prospects of renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy 32(15):2559-2578.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Spurlock, C.A. 2013. Appliance efficiency standards and price discrimination. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Sullivan, M., M. Mercurio, and J. Schellenberg. 2009. Estimated value of service reliability for electric utility customers in the United States. LBNL2132E. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/REPORT%20lbnl-2132e.pdf.

Sullivan, P., W. Cole, N. Blair, E. Lantz, V. Krishnan, T. Mai, D. Mulcahy, and G. Porro. 2015. 2015 standard scenarios annual report: U.S. electric sector scenario exploration. NREL/TP-6A20-64072. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/64072.pdf.

Sun, Y. 2013. HTR development status in China. Paper presented at IAEA TWG-GCR meeting, Vienna, Austria, March 5-7.

Taylor, M., E.S. Rubin, and G.F. Nemet. 2006. The role of technological innovation in meeting California’s greenhouse gas emission targets. 1-2006. http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=epp.

Taylor, M., C.A. Spurlock, and H.C. Yang. 2015. Confronting regulatory cost and quality expectations: An exploration of technical change in minimum efficiency performance standards. Berkeley, CA: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Tennessee Valley Authority. n.d. Our history. https://www.tva.com/About-TVA/Our-History.

Thompson, P. 2010. Learning by doing. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 1(10):429-476.

Tierney, S., and T. Schatzki. 2008. Competitive procurement of retail electricity supply: Recent trends in state policies and utility practices. Boston, MA: Analysis Group. http://www.analysisgroup.com/uploadedfiles/content/insights/publishing/competitive_procurement.pdf.

Tomić, J., and W. Kempton. 2007. Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support. Journal of Power Sources 168(2):459-468.

Tuladhar, S.D., S. Mankowski, and P. Bernstein. 2014. Interaction effects of market-based and command-and-control policies. The Energy Journal 35.

U.S. NRC (United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 2007. Feasibility study for a risk-informed and performance-based regulatory structure for future plant licensing. NUREG-1860. Washington, DC: U.S. NRC.

U.S. NRC. 2012. Report to Congress: Advanced reactor licensing. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1215/ML12153A014.pdf.

U.S. NRC. n.d. Radioactive waste. http://www.nrc.gov/waste.html.

U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force. 2004. Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and recommendations. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/BlackoutFinal-Web.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

UN (United Nations). 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Paris, France: UN.

UNFCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Proposal by the President. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. Geneva, Switzerland: UN. http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/advanced_search/items/6911.php?priref=600008831.

United States. 2015. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, U.S. cover note, INDC, and accompanying information, March 31. http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/United%20States%20of%20America/1/U.S.%20Cover%20Note%20INDC%20and%20Accompanying%20Information.pdf?Mobile=1&Source=%2Fsubmissions%2FINDC%2F_layouts%2Fmobile%2Fdispform%2Easpx%3FList%3D4a67b500-675c-4a0e-be83-649364ee36bb%26View%3D428ea47e-35b4-4eb0-bd45-71f71031d074%26RootFolder%3D%252Fsubmissions%252FINDC%252FPublished%2520Documents%252FUnited%2520States%2520of%2520America%252F1%26ID%3D386%26CurrentPage%3D1 (accessed July 29, 2016).

Valentino, L., V. Valenzuela, A. Botterud, Z. Zhou, and G. Conzelman. 2012. System-wide emissions implications of increased wind penetration. Environmental Science and Technology 46:4200-4206.

van Benthem, A., K. Gillingham, and J. Sweeney. 2008. Learning-by-doing and the optimal solar policy in California. The Energy Journal 29(3):131-152.

Verdolini, E., and M. Galeotti. 2011. At home and abroad: An empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(2):119-134.

Wald, M., and J. Broder. 2011. Utility shelves ambitious plan to limit carbon. The New York Times, July 13, p. A1.

Walls, M., K. Palmer, T. Gerarden, and X. Bak. 2016. Is energy efficiency capitalized into home prices? Evidence from three U.S. cities. RFF DP 13-18 Rev. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Walsh, J., D. Wuebbles, et al. 2014. 2014 national climate assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report (accessed August 4, 2016).

WBDG (Whole Building Design Guide). n.d. Federal high performance and sustainable buildings. http://www.wbdg.org/references/fhpsb.php.

Weisenthal, T., P. Dowling, J. Morbee, C. Thiel, B. Schade, P. Russ, S. Simoes, S. Peteves, K. Schoots, and M. Londo. 2012. Technology learning curves for energy policy support. https://setis.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/reports/Technology-Learning-Curves-Energy-Policy-Support.pdf.

Weitzman, M. 2009. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 91(1):1-19.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

Weitzman, M. 2011. Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(2):275-292.

White House. 2012. President Obama Signs Executive Order promoting industrial energy efficiency. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/08/30/president-obama-signs-executive-order-promoting-industrial-energy-effici (accessed June 28, 2016).

White House. 2015. Executive Order: Planning for federal sustainability in the next decade. March 19. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/19/executive-order-planning-federal-sustainability-next-decade.

Wiesenthal, T., P. Dowling, J. Morbee, C. Thiel, B. Schade, P. Russ, S. Simoes, S. Peteves, K. Schoots, and M. Londo. 2012. Technology learning curves for energy policy support. https://setis.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/reports/Technology-Learning-Curves-Energy-Policy-Support.pdf.

Williams, H. 2012. Innovation inducement prizes: Connecting research to policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31(3):752-776.

Williams, J.H., B. Haley, F. Kahrl, J. Moore, A.D. Jones, M.S. Torn, and H. McJeon. 2014. Pathways to deep decarbonization in the United States. http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/US-Deep-Decarbonization-Report.pdf.

Wilson, C., and H. Dowlatabadi. 2007. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32:169-203.

Wiser, R., and M. Bolinger. 2014. 2013 wind technologies market report. Washington, DC: DOE. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/08/f18/2013%20Wind%20Technologies%20Market%20Report_1.pdf.

WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2015. Nuclear industry stands ready to help tackle climate change. Press statement, December 9. http://world-nuclear.org/press/press-statements/nuclear-industry-stands-ready-to-help-tackle-clima.aspx (accessed August 1, 2016).

Wolf, J. 2012. Oncor knows outage detection. T&D World Magazine, November 1.

Xcel Energy. 2013. Xcel Energy proposes adding economic solar, wind to meet future customer energy demands. Xcel Energy, September 10. https://www.xcelenergy.com/company/media_room/news_releases/xcel_energy_proposes_adding_economic_solar,_wind_to_meet_future_customer_energy_demands.

Yeh, S., and E.S. Rubin. 2012. A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves. Energy Economics 34(3):762-771.

Zachmann, G., A. Serwaah, and M. Peruzzi. 2014. When and how to support renewables? Letting the data speak. http://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/wpaper/811.html.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 213
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 216
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 217
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 219
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 220
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 221
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 222
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 223
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 224
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 225
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 226
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 227
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 228
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 229
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 230
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 231
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 232
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 233
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 234
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 235
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 236
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 237
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 238
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 239
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 240
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 241
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 242
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 243
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21712.
×
Page 244
Next: Appendix A: Committee Biographies »
The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Electric Power Technologies Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $85.00 Buy Ebook | $69.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Electricity, supplied reliably and affordably, is foundational to the U.S. economy and is utterly indispensable to modern society. However, emissions resulting from many forms of electricity generation create environmental risks that could have significant negative economic, security, and human health consequences. Large-scale installation of cleaner power generation has been generally hampered because greener technologies are more expensive than the technologies that currently produce most of our power. Rather than trade affordability and reliability for low emissions, is there a way to balance all three?

The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Energy Technologies considers how to speed up innovations that would dramatically improve the performance and lower the cost of currently available technologies while also developing new advanced cleaner energy technologies. According to this report, there is an opportunity for the United States to continue to lead in the pursuit of increasingly clean, more efficient electricity through innovation in advanced technologies. The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Energy Technologies makes the case that America’s advantages—world-class universities and national laboratories, a vibrant private sector, and innovative states, cities, and regions that are free to experiment with a variety of public policy approaches—position the United States to create and lead a new clean energy revolution. This study focuses on five paths to accelerate the market adoption of increasing clean energy and efficiency technologies: (1) expanding the portfolio of cleaner energy technology options; (2) leveraging the advantages of energy efficiency; (3) facilitating the development of increasing clean technologies, including renewables, nuclear, and cleaner fossil; (4) improving the existing technologies, systems, and infrastructure; and (5) leveling the playing field for cleaner energy technologies.

The Power of Change: Innovation for Development and Deployment of Increasingly Clean Energy Technologies is a call for leadership to transform the United States energy sector in order to both mitigate the risks of greenhouse gas and other pollutants and to spur future economic growth. This study’s focus on science, technology, and economic policy makes it a valuable resource to guide support that produces innovation to meet energy challenges now and for the future.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!