Incorporating ITS Into the Transportation Planning Process: An Integrated Planning Framework (ITS, M&O, Infrastructure) Practitioner's Guidebook (2002)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

VII BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) “Special Edition: Systems MPOs and Intelligent Transportation”, MPO Monitor, Washington, D.C. ( September/October 1998) 2. Apogee Research, Inc, “ Shared Resources: Sharing Right-of-Way for Telecommunications.” For the Federal Highway Administration (April 1998). 3. Bapna, Sanjay; Zaveri, Jigish; and Farkas, Z. Andrew, “Benefit-Cost Assessment of the Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN) in Maryland.” National Transportation Center, Morgan State University, (November 1998). 4. Briggs, Valerie, & Jasper, Keith, “Organizing for Regional Transportation Operations: An Executive Guide.” Booze Allen & Hamilton for the FHWA Office of Travel Management, Washington D.C. (2001). 5. Briggs, Valerie, “New Transportation Regional Organizations.” ITS Quarterly (Fall 1999). 6. Brydia, R.E., Turner, S.M., Eisele, W.L., Liu, J.C., “Development of an ITS Data Management System.” Paper presented at the 1998 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. (January 1998). 7. Cambridge Systematics Inc., “A Guide Book for Performance-Based Transportation Planning.” NCHRP Report 446, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. (2002). 8. Cambridge Systematics Inc., “IDAS Kickoff Meeting”, Presentation by Vassili Alexiadis at Turner- Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA. McLean, Virginia (December 4, 1997). 9. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. “Florida Department of Transportation ITS Planning Guideline”, Internal Drafts. Cambridge, Massachusetts (1998). 10. Cambridge Systematics Inc., “NCHRP Project 8-32(2) Multimodal Transportation: Development of a Performance Based Planning Process – Performance Based Planning Manual Preliminary Draft.” National Cooperative highway Research Program, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. (1999). 11. Cambridge Systematics and ITT Industries. “ITS Deployment Analysis System User’s Manual”, Prepared for Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Federal Highway Administration., Oakland, CA: (January 2000) 12. Castle Rock, & Black & Veatch, “ITS Rural Toolbox for Rural and Small Urban Areas.” for the New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, New York (1999). 13. Castle Rock, “Technology in Rural Transportation Simple Solutions.” Report for Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, McLean Virginia (1997), FHWA-RD-97-108. 14. Center For Urban Transportation Research University Of South Florida, “Florida’s ITS Planning Guidelines: Integration of ITS Into the Transportation Planning Process.” Florida DOT in Corporation with the MPO Advisory Council, Tallahassee, Florida (June 2000). 15. Chicago Area Transportation Study, “Congestion Mitigation Handbook.” Chicago, Illinois (September 1998). 16. Cohen, Harry S.; Stowers, Joseph R; and Petersilia, Michael P., “Evaluating Urban Transportation System Alternatives.” U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C. (November 1978). 17. Conklin, C. & Sussman J., “Regional Architectures, Regional Strategic Transportation Planning and Organizational Strategies.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual ITS America Conference, Boston Massachusetts, (April 30-May 3rd, 2000). BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-1

18. Dahms, L., and L. Klein. “The San Francisco Bay Area’s Approach to System Management.” ITE Journal, Washington, D.C.: Institute of Transportation Engineers (December, 1998). 19. Daniels, G. & Starr, T, “Guidelines for Funding Operations and Maintenance of Intelligent Transportation Systems/Advanced Traffic Management Systems.” Transportation Research Record 1588. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. (1996). 20. Deblasio, et.al, “A Review of Metropolitan Area Early Development Plans and Congestion Management Systems for the Development of Intelligent Transportation Systems.” For U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge Massachusetts (September 1997) 21. Deblasio, et.al, “Strategies For Incorporating ITS Solutions Into The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.” For U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge Massachusetts (December 1998). 22. Delaware DOT Division of Planning, “Highlights of DelDOT’s Long-Range Transportation Plan.” brochure (undated). 23. Eisele B, “Current ITS Data Archiving Practices in North America.” Presentation at 2000 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. (January 2000). 24. ERTICO ITS City Pioneers, “ITS Planning Handbook: Intelligent City Transport.” Brussels Belgium (1998). 25. Flannery, A, “DRAFT ITS Data Archiving Five-Year Program Description.” Mitretek Systems for the FHWA Office of Highway Information Management, Washington, D.C. (March 2000). 26. Florida Department of Transportation, “Florida Statewide ITS Strategic Plan.” FDOT, Tallahassee Florida (1999). 27. Hagler Bailly, “The Market For Emerging Technology Applications in Transportation: Market Analysis and Forecasts.” Arlington, Virginia (1999). 28. Ham, Douglas B, “Integrating Intelligent Transportation Systems And Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Some Integration, Much More Needed.” Presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (August 1998). 29. Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC), “ITS Strategic Deployment Plan 2000.” Hampton Roads, Virginia (2002). “http://www.hrpdc.org/transport/program4.shtml.” 30. Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC), “ITS Strategic Deployment Plan for the Hampton Roads Region: “ COMPARE” Hampton Roads.” Prepared by the I-95 Northeast Planning Consultants for the HRPDC ITS Committee Hampton Roads, Virginia (October1995). 31. Hicks, Robert, “Key O&M Issues to Local Governments.” Notes from a meeting of the Public Technology, Inc. (PTI) Urban Consortium Transportation Task Force (Spring 2000). 32. Humphrey, Thomas F, “Synthesis of Highway Practice 217: Consideration of the 15 Factors in the Metropolitan Planning Process.” National Cooperative highway Research Program, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. (1995). 33. Hunt, J., “Issues with Evaluating Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Planning Process.” Paper presented at the 10th Annual ITS America Conference, Boston Massachusetts, (April 30-May 3rd, 2000). 34. Ishimaru, J. & Hallenbeck, M, “Flow Evaluation Design Technical Report.” Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) for WSDOT, Seattle Washington (1999). 35. ITS America, “ITS Action Guide: Realizing the Benefits.” ITS America, Washington D.C. (1996). 36. Jacobsen, L. “Mainstreaming ITS, Management and operations into the Planning Process” Presentation at ITS America Annual Conference. Washington, D.C. (April 1999) BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-2

37. JHK and Associates, “Venture Washington IVHS Strategic Plan for Washington State.” Washington State Department of Transportation, (November 1993). 38. Johnson, Christine, “The Future of ITS.” Keynote Presentation at the Intelligent Transportation Society of America Annual Meeting, Miami Beach Florida (June 2001). 39. Lindley J.A. 1986, “Quantification of Urban Freeway Congestion And Analysis of Remedial Measures.” FHWA RD-87/052, Washington, D.C. (1986). 40. Lockwood, Steve, “Mainstreaming Management, Operations, And ITS Into The Planning Process.” Conference on Refocusing Planning for the 21st Century, February 1999. Washington D.C. (1999). 41. Maccubbin, R, “Intelligent Transportation Systems Benefits: 2001 Update.” Mitretek Systems for the U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office, Washington, D.C. (2001). 42. Margiotta, R, “ ITS as a Data Resource: Preliminary Requirements for a User Service. ” Report FHWA-PL-98-031. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC (April 1998). 43. Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), “MAG ITS Strategic Plan Update.” MAG. Phoenix Arizona (April 2001). 44. McQueen, B & McQueen J., “Intelligent Transportation Systems Architecture.” Artech House (1999). 45. Mergel, J, “The Capability of ITS to Provide Systems Performance Data: Draft Final Report.” For FHWA Office of Environment and Planning, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge Massachusetts (1998). 46. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, “Draft 1998 Regional Transportation Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area.” Oakland, CA (August 1998). 47. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG). ”The Vision”. Vision statement adopted by the Transportation Planning Board on October 21, 1998, Washington, D.C. (1988) 48. Meyer, M, “A Toolbox for Alleviating Traffic Congestion and Enhancing Mobility2nd Edition.” Prepared for the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. (1998). 49. Mickelson, Robert P, “Synthesis of Highway Practice 267: Transportation Development Process.” National Cooperative highway Research Program, National Academy Press, Washington D.C. (1998). 50. Mitretek Systems Inc, “Incorporating ITS into Transportation Planning: Phase 1 Final Report.” Federal Highway Administration, (September 1997). 51. Mitretek Systems Inc, “Incorporating ITS into Corridor Planning:- Seattle Case Study – Final Report.” For U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-JPO, Washington D.C. (August 1999). 52. Mitretek Systems Inc, “NCHRP 8-35: Incorporating ITS into the Planning Process Interim Report.” For the National Cooperative Highway Research Council of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. (August 1999b). 53. Mitretek Systems, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, and CH2MHill, “Incorporating ITS into Corridor Planning: Seattle Case Study.” Federal Highway Administration. (May 1997). 54. National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), “Working Together On Transportation Planning: An Approach to Collaborative Decision Making.” For FTA Office of Policy, Washington D.C. (May 1995). 55. National ITS Architecture Team, “Draft Regional ITS Architecture Guidance.” U.S. DOT, Washington D.C. (July 2001). 56. National Highway Institute. Course #13602: “Deploying Integrated Intelligent Transportation Systems—Metropolitan.” Course slides. Washington, D.C. (1998) 57. National Highway Institute. (1999) Course #15260: “Advanced Travel Demand Forecasting.” Course notes. Washington, D.C. (1999) BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-3

58. O’Neill, W. & Klancher, W, “The Use of ITS Data For Transportation Planning: Future Research Needs.” Paper presented at the 1998 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C. (1998). 59. Orski, C. Kenneth, “Developing an “Operations Vision”: 1. The Dialog Begins.” Summary of the April 2-5 Conference on Transportation Operations convened by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (June 2000). 60. PB Farradyne Inc, “Florida Statewide ITS Strategic Plan: ITS Cost Analysis Issue Paper.” Technical Paper for Florida DOT, Tallahassee, Florida (1999). 61. Proper, A, “Intelligent Transportation Systems Benefits” Mitretek Systems for FHWA, Washington, D.C. (May 1999). 62. Rush, J., Penic, M., “Integrating ITS and Traditional Planning-Lessons Learned: I-64 Corridor Major Investment Study.” Prepared for FHWA by Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. & SAIC, Washington, D.C. (1998). 63. SAIC. “User’s Manual for SCRITS, SCReening Analysis for ITS”, Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications (January, 1999) 64. SAIC, “Draft Regional Planning for Operations Guidance.” White paper for the FHWA Operations Core Business Unit, Washington, D.C. (2001). 65. Sarah J Siwek & Associates Transportation and Environmental Consulting, “A Guide to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Under ISTEA: How the Pieces Fit Together.” For FHWA Office of Environment and Planning, Washington D.C. (July 1995). 66. Sarah J Siwek & Associates Transportation and Environmental Consulting, “Transportation Planning and ITS: Putting the Pieces Together.” For FHWA Office of Environment and Planning, Washington D.C. (June 1998). 67. Sarah J Siwek & Associates Transportation and Environmental Consulting, “Statewide Transportation Planning Under ISTEA: A New Decision Making Framework.” for FHWA Office of Environment and Planning, Washington D.C. (October 1996). 68. Saylor, George, “ARTIMIS and FAST-TRAC Lifecycle Case Study Summary.” Proceeding to the TRB 2002 Annual Meeting Workshop, The Truth About the Costs of ITS, (January 2002). 69. Shrank, David. And Lomax, Tim, “The 2001 Urban Mobility Report.” Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas (2001). 70. Smith, B.L. et. Al, “Final Report: Evaluation of the ITS Planning Process.” Virginia Transportation Research Council for FHWA. Charlottesville, Virginia. (FHWA Project IVH-9351 –602) (1995). 71. Smith, H, “Improving Transit With Intelligent Transportation Systems.” ITS America, Washington, D.C. December 1998. 72. SRI Consulting, Intelligent Transportation Systems 2: 1998-1999. Series of 8 market analyses. Menlo Park, California (1999). 73. Staples, B, “Guidance on Including ITS Elements in Transportation Projects.” Mitretek Systems for the FHWA Office of Travel Management, Washington, D.C. (2001). 74. Taft, Alex, “The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Role in Management and Operations: An AMPO White Paper.” Association Of Metropolitan Planning Organizations, Washington D.C. (2001). 75. Texas Transportation Institute, “ITS Data Management System: Year One Activities.” Federal Highway Administration (August 1997). 76. Transcore, “Integrating Intelligent Transportation Systems within the Transportation Planning Process: An Interim Handbook.” For the FHWA Office of Traffic Management and ITS Applications and Office of Environment and Planning, Washington D.C. (January 1998). BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-4

77. Transportation Research Board, “Conference on Refocusing Planning for the 21st Century Breakout Session Summaries.” Washington D.C. (February 1999). 78. Tucker, P, “Intelligent Transport Systems: A review of technologies, players and market prospects.” Automotive World, Westborough, Massachusetts (1998). 79. Turner, S.M., “Archived ITS Data: Data Quality Issues.” Paper presented at the 2000 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington. D.C. (January 2000). 80. Turner, S.M., “Guidelines for Developing ITS Data Archiving Systems.” Texas Transportation Institute Report 2127-3, Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (September 2001). 81. Turner, S.M., Eisele, W.L., Gajewski, B.J., Albert, L.P., and Benz, R.J, “ITS Data Archiving: Case Study Analyses of San Antonio TransGuide® Data.” Report No. FHWA-PL-99-024. Federal Highway Administration, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Texas (August 1999). 82. U.S. Department of Transportation, “The National ITS Architecture: A Framework for Integrated Transportation into the 21st Century Version 3.0.” http://itsavea.iteris.com, Washington D.C. (1999). 83. U.S. Department of Transportation, “The National ITS Architecture: A Framework for Integrated Transportation into the 21st Century Version 4.0.” http://itsavea.iteris.com, Washington D.C. (April 2002). 84. U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, “Statewide Planning: Metropolitan Planning: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Washington D.C. (October 28th, 1993). 85. U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, “Interim Guidance on Consistency with the National ITS Architecture.” Federal Register, Washington D.C. (October 2, 1998). 86. U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, “Management and Monitoring Systems: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Washington D.C. (December 19th, 1996). 87. U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, “TEA-21 Planning and Environmental Provisions: Options For Discussion.” Federal Policy White Paper for the FHWA Office of Metropolitan Planning and Programs & the FTA Office of Planning Operations, Washington D.C. (March 1999). 88. U.S. Federal Highway Administration FHWA and Florida DOT in Association with Teach America Corporation, “Congestion Management Systems INTERACTIVE CD-ROM: Version 1 Prototype.” Washington D.C. (1998). 89. U.S. Federal Highway Administration Joint Program Office, “Phoenix Metropolitan Model Deployment Initiative: Evaluation Report.” (April 2000). 90. U.S. Federal Highway Administration, “23 CFR Parts 655 and 940, Intelligent Transportation System Architecture and Standards: Final Rule.” Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 5, page 14446. (January 8, 2001). 91. U.S. Federal Transit Administration, “National ITS Architecture Policy on Transit Projects.” Federal Register, Vol. 66, No. 5, page 14455. (January 8, 2001). 92. Virginia Department of Transportation, “Virginia’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Interim Tactical Plan.” (August 1996). 93. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, “Local Funding of Operations Activities (briefing).” (November 2001). 94. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, “Successful Approaches to Deploying a Metropolitan Intelligent Transportation System.” for the Federal Highway Administration (March 1999). BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-5

95. Weiner, Edward, “Urban Transportation Planning in the United States: An Historical Overview, 5th Edition.” For US DOT Technology Sharing Program, Washington D.C. (September 1997). 96. Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO), 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, “Connections to the 21st Century, Draft #1 of 3.” (May 1999). 97. Winick, R, “Using ITS-Derived Data for Transportation Planning, Programming, and Operations.” paper prepared for the ITS as a Data Resource Workshop, Washington D.C. (1998). 98. World Road Association (PIARC), “ITS Handbook ’99.” Washington D.C. (1999). 99. Yim, Youngbin, & Miller, Mark A, “Evaluation of TravInfo Field Operational Test.” (April 2000). 100. Zavattero, D, “Introduction for the Modeling and Simulation Workshop”, January 9th 199 Workshop at the 78th Annual TRB Meeting, Transportation Research Board (January 1999). 101. Zavattero, D, “Consistency with the Intelligent Transportation System national Architecture through the Metropolitan Planning Process.” Paper presented at the Intelligent Transportation Society of America’s Annual Conference, Boston Massachusetts (May 2000). 102. Zavattero, D., and A. Smoliak. “Local ITS Deployment and Consensus Building: The Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Role in ITS Development in the Chicago Region.” ITS America Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: ITS America. (1996) BIBLIOGRAPHY VII-6