National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Abbreviations and Acronyms
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22155.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22155.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22155.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22155.
×
Page 63

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

60 REFERENCES Abdelrahman, M., T. Zayed, and A. Elyamany, “Best-Value Model Based on Project Specific Characteristics,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2008, pp. 179–188. Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Guide for Use of Oral Presentations in Contracting by Negotiation, AFMC, Wright-Paterson Air Force Base, Ohio, May 28, 1999. Alder, R., UDOT Construction Manager General Contract (CMGC) Annual Report, Engineering Services and Bridge Design Section, Utah Department of Transportation Proj- ect Development Group, Salt Lake City, 2007, 39 pp. Alinger, M., “Recent Developments in Task and Delivery Order Contracting,” Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2010, pp. 839–852. American Council of Engineering Companies, “Qualifications- Based Selection,” Unpublished presentation, 2010, 28 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.acec.org/advocacy/ committees/ppt/acec_qbs_pres1.ppt [accessed May 25, 2013]. Anderson, S., K. Molenaar, and C. Schexnayder, NCHRP Syn- thesis 474: Guidance for Cost Estimation and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, 290 pp. Arizona Department of Transportation, Sign, Marker, and Delineator Installation and Maintenance, Statewide, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, 2013. Association of General Contractors of America (AGCA), Proj- ect Delivery Systems for Construction, AGCA, Washington, D.C., 2004. Boddy, R. and G. Smith, Statistical Methods in Practice for Scientists and Technologists, John Wiley and Sons, Oxford, U.K., 2009. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Invita- tion for Bid # 06A1964 Notice to Prospective Contractors, Division of Procurement and Contracts, Caltrans, Sacra- mento, Apr. 15, 2014. Carr, R.I., “Impact of Number of Bidders on Competition,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 1, 1983, pp. 61–73. Centennial Contractors, Inc., Design-Build Project Manual, Centennial Contractors, Inc., Vienna, Va., 2004, 137 pp. Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), Request for Proposals, Solicitation #: DTFH68-12-R-00004, Expedite Roadway Surfacing, Resurfacing, and Repair Contracts, CFLHD, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Mar. 3, 2012. Couture, N.J., “It’s Time to Engage,” Contract Management, Business Insights: Essentials, Vol. 45, No. 11, Nov. 2005, p. 2. Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), Special Experiment Project No. 14 (SEP-14) Alternative Contract- ing, DelDOT, Wilmington, Apr. 2013. Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), Design-Build Man- ual of Practice, DBIA, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 6–35. Department of Air Force (DAF), Solicitation Number: FA3030-14-R0004, Federal Business Opportunities, DAF, Waldorf, Md., May 20, 2014 [Online]. Available: https:// www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=4b5 292d6d694571592290fa2f36d0000&tab=core&_cview=1 [accessed June 1, 2014]. Department of Defense, DOD Use of Multiple Award Task Order Contracts, Office of the Inspector General, DoD, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2, 1999. Department of Defense (DoD), “Contracts for Novem- ber 8, 2005,” Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, DoD, Washington, D.C., Nov. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.defense.gov/Contracts/Contract. aspx?ContractID=3131 [accessed June 1, 2014]. Dunston, P. and A. Reed, “Benefits of Small Projects Team Ini- tiative,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Manage- ment, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, 2000, pp. 22–28. El Wardani, M., J. Messner, and M. Horman, “Comparing Procurement Methods for Design-Build Projects,” Jour- nal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 3, 2006, pp. 230–238. Farris, D., “Checking Your Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) IQ,” The Construction Lawyer, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, p. 24. Farris, D., “Indefinite Delivery Contracts,” Farris Law Firm LLC, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.farrislawfirm. com/Default.aspx?PageID=87 [accessed June 1, 2014]. Federal Highway Administration, “Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ programadmin/172qa.pdf. [accessed Aug. 5, 2014]. Federal Highway Administration, “Construction Program Guide, Construction Management/General Contractor Project Delivery,” Federal Highway Administration, Wash- ington, D.C., 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/construction/cqit/cm.cfm [accessed May 20, 2014]. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Request for Proposal for Districtwide Traffic Operations Design-Build Push Button Contract, FDOT, Tallahassee, June 1, 2009. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Exhibit A, Emergency Debris Removal—Natural Disaster—Debris Removal, Florida DOT, Tallahassee, 2010a. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Disaster Debris Removal Monitoring Services Agreement, Florida DOT, Tallahassee, 2010b. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District 7 Design-Build Push Button Contract, Unpublished presen- tation, May 12, 2011, FDOT, Tallahassee, p. 31 [Online]. Available: http://modot.org/business/outdoor_advertising/ documents/AASHTO%20Presentations%202011/

61 Florida_Design%20Build%20Push.pdf [accessed June 1, 2014]. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Design-Build Guidelines, FDOT, Tallahassee, Aug. 2012. General Services Administration, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and National Aeronautics and Space Administra- tion, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Volume I, Subpart 2.1, Washington, D.C., 2005. General Services Administration (GSA), How to Sell to the Government—Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Con- tracts, GSA, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2013 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103926 [accessed July 6, 2014]. The Gordian Group, Book 3, Construction Task Catalog, Vol. 1, National Joint Powers Alliance, Minnesota, May 2011. Graham, P., Evaluation of Design-Build Practice in Colorado, Research Report IR(CX) 70 4(143), Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1997. Gransberg, D.D., “Case Studies of Early Contractor Design Involvement to Expedite the Delivery of Emergency High- way Projects,” Transportation Research Record No. 2347, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washing- ton, D.C., 2013, pp. 19–26. Gransberg, D.D. and M.A. Ellicott, “Best-value Contract- ing Criteria,” Cost Engineering, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1997, pp. 31–34. Gransberg, D.D. and C. Riemer, “Impact of Inaccurate Engi- neer’s Estimated Quantities on Unit Price Contracts,” Jour- nal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 11, Nov. 2009, pp. 1138–1145. Gransberg, D.D. and J.S. Shane, NCHRP Synthesis 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for High- way Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, 127 pp. Gransberg, D.D. and M.C. Loulakis, NCHRP Synthesis 438: Expedited Procurement Procedures for Emergency Construction Services, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, 118 pp. Gransberg, D.D., M.C. Loulakis, and G.M. Gad, NCHRP Synthesis 455: Alternative Technical Concepts for Con- tract Delivery Methods, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, 119 pp. Gransberg, D.D. and J.A. Rueda, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Final Report, MnDOT Contract 99/004/Work Order, MnDOT, St. Paul, Feb. 2014. Haukohl, R. and W. Macicak, “Failure to Communicate: Risks of Independently Retained Design Professionals,” Forensic Engineering 2012, ASCE, pp. 378–387. Hessing, H., “Sole Source Contracting. SPECIAL ISSUE: Engineers, Infrastructure, & Politics: A Case for Collabora- tive,” Dialogue Leadership and Management in Engineer- ing, 2008, pp. 183–185. Ibbs, C., Y. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. Odabasi, “Project Delivery Systems and Project Change: Quantitative Analysis,” Jour- nal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 4, 2003, pp. 382–387. Idaho Transportation Department (IDT), Request for Qualifi- cations for Term Agreement for Consultant Services, IDT, Boise, Nov. 2013. Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT), 3 Year On-Call Contract—Threatened and Endangered Species Services, Request for Proposals, IDOT, Ames, 2011. Jeffrey, J. and C. Menches, “Emergency Contracting Strate- gies for Federal Projects,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 4, 2008, pp. 371–379. King, B.C. and C.J. Patterson, “Representation of Multiple Parties in the Construction Arena: Ethical Issues,” Con- struction Law. Vol. 25, 2005, p. 5. Koch, J.E., D.D. Gransberg, and K.R. Molenaar, Project Administration for Design-Build: A Primer for Owners, Engineers, and Contractors, ASCE Press, Reston, Va., 2010, 286 pp. Kraft, E., H. Park, and D.D. Gransberg, “Performance Bond: Cost Benefit and Paradox for Public Highway Agencies,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transpor- tation Research Board, No. 2408, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 3–9. Lexis/Nexis, “Construction Law, Lexis/Nexis,” 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/ us/?gclid=COqAw-H2ir8CFcdFMgod5DAAUg [accessed May 15, 2014]. Liao, S.S.C., “Enhancing Ethics and the Competitive Envi- ronment by Accounting for Conflict of Interest in Project Procurement,” Leadership and Management in Engineer- ing, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013, pp. 86–95. Lo, W. and M. Yan, “Evaluating Qualification-Based Selection System: A Simulation Approach,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 6, 2003, pp. 458–465. Maine Department of Transportation (Maine DOT), On Call Paving Services (No Pin Project) Statewide, Maintenance and Operations, Maine DOT, Augusta, Nov. 2011. Matchette, R.B. and J.S. Danis, Guide to Federal Records in the National Archives of the United States, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C., 1995. Minnesota Department of Administration (MnDOT), Glossary of Common Procurement Terms, Materials Management Division, MnDOT, St. Paul, 2007. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Design- Build Manual, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting, MnDOT, St. Paul, Aug. 2011. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Grad- ing, Bituminous Mill & Overlay, ADA Improvements, and Signal Revision (IDIQ), Contract ID 130601, State Proj- ect No. 5804-56, MnDOT, St. Paul, May 28, 2013a.

62 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Noise Walls (IDIQ), Office of Construction and Innovative Con- tracting, MnDOT, St. Paul, 2013b. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Indefi- nite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Implementation Guide, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting (OCIC), MnDOT, St. Paul, 2014. Missouri Department of Transportation, Job Number: J2I2165T, Various Counties, Missouri Highways and Trans- portation Commission, Jefferson City, 2010. Morris, P. and W.F. Willson, “Measuring and Managing Cost Escalation,” AACE International Transactions, 2006, pp. 06.1–06.7. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), “Solic- itation Number: N6247012R5010,” Federal Business Opportunities (FBO), NAVFAC, Washington Navy Yard, Apr. 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.fbo.gov/?s= opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=b718f77cfe76 431a80afca0ba98ceca6&_cview=0https://www.fbo.gov [accessed June 1, 2014]. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Solicita- tion Number: N3319114R1200, Federal Business Oppor- tunities, NAVFAC, Washington Navy Yard, Apr. 8, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opport unity&mode=form&id=acc3b934c5aac5448cb53cc10cc5 5d3d&tab=core&_cview=1 [accessed June 1, 2014]. Neuendorf, K.A., The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2002. Nevada Department of Transportation, Environmental Services Procedures Guide, Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, Jan. 2008. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Work Plan for Utilizing Job Order Contracting for Bridge Preservation and Maintenance, NYSDOT, Albany, Nov. 26, 2007a. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Statewide Emergency Bridge Contract: Guidance, NYSDOT Engineering Instruction EI 07-012, NYSDOT, Albany, 2007b, 1–3 pp. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Proposal D261160, NYSDOT, Albany, May 21, 2009. New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), NYSDOT/FHWA SEP 14 Pilot Program, Job Order Contracts for Bridge Maintenance, NYSDOT, Albany, Mar. 2012. Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), Best Practices for Multiple Award Task and Delivery Order Contracting, Executive Office of the President, OFPP, Office of Man- agement and Budget, Washington, D.C., Interim Edition, Feb. 1997. Office of the Federal Register (OFR), Code of Federal Regu- lations, 23 CFR 636.116, U.S. OFR, Government of Print- ing Office, Washington D.C., 2007. Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), Contrac- tor’s Prequalification Application, ODOT, July 7, 2010. Oppenheim, A.N., Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Continuum, London, U.K., 2000. Rueda, J.A., Develop a Price Escalation Method for Min- nesota Department of Transportation Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity: AxE Bidding, Master’s Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, 2013, 173 pp. Rueda, J.A. and D.D. Gransberg, “Fundamentals of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting: A Primer for Public Transportation Agencies,” Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, Pre- print 14-0631, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 2014a. Rueda, J.A. and D.D. Gransberg, “Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity Contracting: A Case Study Analysis,” Transportation Research Board: Journal of Transporta- tion Research Board, No. 2048, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014b, pp. 17–25. Sandner, C.L. and M.I. Snyder, “Multiple Award Task and Delivery Order Contracting: A Contracting Primer,” Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 30, 2001, p. 461. Sechrist, R., E. Westhuis, and D. Kenneally, “Hurricane Irene, Tropical Storm Lee, Preparation, Response and Recov- ery,” Proceedings 17th Statewide Conference on Local Bridges, Syracuse, N.Y., Oct. 26, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.ny.gov/division/engineering/structures/ events-news/2011/presentations [accessed Apr. 9, 2012]. Scott, S., K. Molenaar, D. Gransberg, and N. Smith, NCHRP Report 561: Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 167 pp. Shane, J.S., D.D. Gransberg, K.R. Molenaar, and J.R. Gladke, “Legal Challenge to a Best-Value Procurement System,” Journal of Leadership and Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 5, No.1, Jan. 2006, pp. 1–6. Shane, J. and D.D. Gransberg, “Coordination of the Design Contract with the Construction Manager-at-Risk Precon- struction Service Contract,” Transportation Research Board: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2151, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, pp. 55–59. Shields, M.D., Glossary of Federal Acquisition Terms, Federal Acquisition Institute, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1998, 121 pp. South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT), Supplemental Information for Bridge Design Engineering Services, Solicitation Number s-120-14, SCDOT, Colum- bia, 2014. Strang, W., “The Risk in CM at-Risk,” CM eJournal, Con- struction Management Association of America, McLean, Va., 2002, pp. 1–9. Stukhart, G., “Contractual Incentives,” Journal of Construc- tion Engineering and Management, Vol. 110, No. 1, 1984, pp. 34–42. Tennessee Department of Transportation (TennDOT), General Notes Regarding On-Call Emergency Flood Repairs. Con- tracts CNJ210 thru CNJ221, various counties, TennDOT, Nashville, 2010. Thornton, K.D., “Fine-Tuning Acquisition Reform’s Favor- ite Procurement Vehicle, The Indefinite Delivery Con- tract,” Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 383, No. 31, 2002, p. 2.

63 Touran, A. and R. Lopez, “Modeling Cost Escalation in Large Infrastructure Projects,” Journal of Construction Engi- neering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2006, pp. 853–860. U.S. Army Sustainment Command, “ASC Selects LOGCAP IV Contractors,” U.S. Army Sustainment Command, U.S. Army, Rock Island, Ill., June 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.army.mil/article/3836 [accessed June 6, 2014]. U.S. Census Bureau, “December 2013 Construction at $930.5 Billion Annual Rate,” US Census Bureau News, Washington, D.C., Feb. 3, 2014, pp. 1–5. U.S. Congress, The Budget of the United States Government for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1952, House Document No. 17, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1951. U.S. Congress, Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) of 1994, Public Law 103-355, 1994. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO), Ineffective Man- agement of GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule Program—A Costly, Serious, and Longstanding Problem, Controller General of the United States, GAO, Washington, D.C., May 1979. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO), Using Structured Interviewing Techniques, GAO/PEMD-10.1.5, GAO, Washington, D.C., June 1991, 191 pp. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), Contractor Application for Prequalification, UDOT, Salt Lake City, June 2010a. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), Multiple Project Contracting for On-Call Professional/Engineering Ser- vices Process, UDOT, Salt Lake City, Dec. 2010b. Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans), Utilizing Main- tenance Rental Agreements (MRA) for Various Preventive Maintenance, Preservation, and Repair Contracting Needs, SEP-14 Work Plan. VTrans, Montpelier, Jan. 5, 2009. Walewski, J., E. Gibson, and J. Jasper, Project Delivery Meth- ods and Contracting Approaches Available for Implemen- tation by the Texas Department of Transportation, FHWA/ TX-0-2129-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Oct. 2001. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Consultant Services Manual, Environmental and Engi- neering Programs, Design Office, WSDOT, Olympia, June 2011. Westlaw, “Westlaw Database Directory,” Thomson Reuters, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://directory.westlaw.com/ [accessed May 15, 2014]. West, N.J.N., D.D. Gransberg, and J. McMinimee, “Effec- tive Tools for Projects Delivered Using the Construction Manager/General Contractor,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2268, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 33–42. White, R., Loading the Dice in DC, Legally: Learn the Politics and Realities of Federal Contracting, Fedmarket, 2011, 7 pp. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, San Francisco, Calif., 1994. Yu, W. and K. Wang, “Best Value or Lowest Bid? A Quanti- tative Perspective,” Journal of Construction Engineer- ing and Management, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 1, 2012, pp. 128–134.

Next: Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire and Results State DOTs »
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices Get This Book
×
 Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 473: Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Practices examines practices related to the use of Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracting by transportation agencies for highway design, construction, and maintenance contracts. The synthesis covers multiple aspects of IDIQ practice, including contracting techniques, terminology used by transportation agencies, contract advertising and award practices, successful contracting procedures, pricing methods, risk management issues, and effective contract administration practices.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!