National Academies Press: OpenBook

Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models (2008)

Chapter: References

« Previous: Chapter Nine - Conclusions and Further Research
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23106.
×
Page 77
Page 78
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23106.
×
Page 78
Page 79
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23106.
×
Page 79
Page 80
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2008. Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23106.
×
Page 80

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

77 2005 Washington–Baltimore Regional Air Passenger Sur- vey, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Prepared in cooperation with Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and Maryland Aviation Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2006. Atherton, T.J. and M.E. Ben-Akiva, “Transferability and Updating of Disaggregate Travel Demand Models,” Transportation Research Record 610, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1976, pp. 12–18. Badoe, D.A. and E.J. Miller, “Analysis of Temporal Transfer- ability of Disaggregate Work Trip Mode Choice Models,” Transportation Research Record 1493, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 1–11. BART–Oakland International Airport Connector, Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement, State Clearinghouse Number 99112009, U.S. Federal Transit Administration and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, Oakland, Calif., Mar. 2002. Baycast-90 Users Guide: San Francisco Bay Area Travel Demand Model System (Cube/Voyager Version), Metro- politan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., Aug. 2004. Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985. Bierlaire, M., “BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estima- tion of Discrete Choice Models,” Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003. Bondzio, L., “Study of Airport Choice and Airport Access Mode Choice in Southern Germany,” Airport Planning Issues, Proceedings of Seminar K, held at the Planning and Transport, Research and Computation European Transport Forum, Brunel University, England, Sep. 2–6, 1996, Vol. P 409, 1996. Bowman, J.L., Portland PDX Airport Access Project Mode Choice Models, memorandum to Keith Lawton, Portland Metro, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., July 28, 1997. Boyle, D.K. and P.R. Gawkowski, “Public Transportation for Airport Employees: Q3 Extension into John F. Kennedy International Airport,” Transportation Research Record 1373, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 26–34. Bradley, M., M.L. Outwater, N. Jonnalagadda, and E. Ruiter, “Estimation of an Activity-Based Microsimulation Model for San Francisco,” Presented at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 7–11, 2001. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Portland International Airport Alternative Mode Study, Prepared for the Port of Portland, Portland, Ore., Oct. 1998. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., NCTCOG Mode Choice Model Estimation, Prepared for the North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington, Tex., undated (file last modified Oct. 4, 2005) [Online]. Available: http://www.nctcog.org/ trans/modeling/documentation/index.asp [June 12, 2007]. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., with Urban Analytics, Inc., PSRC Travel Model Improvements: Final Report, Prepared for Puget Sound Regional Council, Seattle, Wash., Mar. 2003. Chang, S.K.J. and C.-L. Hsu, “Intermodal Facilities—Mod- eling Passenger Waiting Time for Intermodal Transit Sta- tions, Transportation Research Record 1753, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 69–79. COG/TPB Travel Forecasting Models, Version 2.2: Specifi- cation, Validation, and User’s Guide, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and National Capi- tal Region Transportation Planning Board, Draft, Wash- ington, D.C., Jan. 19, 2007. Coogan, M.A., The Peer Airport Analysis Report, Prepared for the Port of Portland, Apr. 9, 1997. (Included as Appendix D to Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Portland International Airport Alternative Mode Study, Prepared for the Port of Portland, Portland, Ore., Oct. 1998.) Dallas–Fort Worth Regional Travel Model (DFWRTM): Model Description, Transportation Department, Model Development Group, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington, Tex., Draft, Feb. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.nctcog.org/trans/modeling/docu- mentation/index.asp [June 12, 2007]. DKS Associates, Downtown/Natomas/Airport Corridor Al- ternatives Analysis/Draft Environmental Impact State- ment and Environmental Impact Report—Travel Demand Forecasting, Service and Patronage Impact Assessment Methodology Report, Prepared for Sacramento Regional Transit District under subcontract to Parsons Brincker- hoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., Sacramento, Calif., Apr. 15, 2002. DKS Associates, Downtown–Natomas–Airport: Travel Forecasting Documentation and Results, Draft, Prepared for Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Sacramento Regional Transit District, Sacramento, Calif., Nov. 2004. DMJM Aviation, Inc., Dallas/Fort Worth International Air- port Rail Planning and Implementation Study—Major In- vestment Study, Prepared for North Central Texas Council of Governments, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, and Fort Worth Transportation Authority, Fort Worth, Tex., Dec. 18, 2002. REFERENCES

Domencich, T. and D.L. McFadden, Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis, North–Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975, reprinted 1996. Dowling Associates, Inc., San Jose International Airport Transit Connection Ridership, Final Report, Prepared for San Jose International Airport, Lea+Elliott and Walker Parking, Oakland, Calif., Jun. 2002. Dunlay, W.J., “Model of Employee Access Traffic,” Trans- portation Engineering Journal, Vol. 104, No. TE3, May 1978, pp. 349–361. Ellis, R.H., J.C. Bennett, and P.R. Rassam, “Approaches for Improving Airport Access,” Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 100, No. TE3, Aug. 1974, pp. 661–673. Flyvberg, B., “Measuring Inaccuracy in Travel Forecasting: Methodological Considerations Regarding Ramp Up and Sampling,” Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 522–530. Flyvberg, B., “Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, advance online publi- cation, Mar. 9, 2007. Flyvberg, B., M.K.S. Holm, and S.L. Buhl, “How (In)accu- rate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 71, No. 2, Spring 2005, pp. 131–146. Fratar, T.J., A.M. Voorhees, and M.S. Raff, “Forecasting the Distribution of Interzonal Vehicular Trips by Successive Approximations,” Proceedings of the Highway Research Board, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., Vol. 33, 1954, pp. 376–384. FY-2003 Models Development Program for COG/TPB Travel Models, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments and National Capital Region Transporta- tion Planning Board, Washington, D.C., Draft, June 30, 2003. FY-2005 Development Program for TPB Travel Forecasting Models, Metropolitan Washington Council of Govern- ments, National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Washington, D.C., Draft, June 30, 2005. FY-2006 Development Program for TPB Travel Forecasting Models, Metropolitan Washington Council of Govern- ments, National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Washington, D.C., June 30, 2006. Galbraith, R.A. and D.A. Hensher, “Intra-Metropolitan Transferability of Mode Choice Models,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, Jan. 1982, pp. 7–29. Gosling, G.D., An Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Model, Technical Document UCB-ITS-TD-84-6, Insti- tute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, July 1984. Gosling, G.D.; Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; and SH&E, Inc., SCAG Regional Airport Demand Model: Literature Review, Prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, Calif., June 2003. Gosling, G.D., “Surface Transportation,” In Airport Air Quality: Approaches, Basics & Challenges, M. Kenny 78 and D. Reid, eds., Institute of Transportation Studies, Technology Transfer Program, University of California, Berkeley, 2005, pp. 64–75. Gosling, G.D., “Predictive Reliability of Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models,” Transportation Research Record 1951, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 69–75. Guilbault, et Associés, Navette du Centre-Ville à l’Aéroport Montréal–Trudeau—Volet: Passagers (Shuttle from the City Center to Montréal–Trudeau Airport—Section: Pas- sengers), Final Report, Prepared for Aéroports de Montréal, Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville, Québec, Canada, July 29, 2005. Halcrow Group Limited with Cansult Ltd., Air Rail Link from Lester B. Pearson International Airport to Union Station: Revenue and Ridership Study, Report T8080-01- 1213, Final Report, Prepared for Transport Canada, May 2002a. Halcrow Group Ltd., SERAS Surface Access Modelling, Prepared for the Department of Transport, Local Govern- ment and the Regions, South East and East of England Regional Air Services Study, London, England, July 2002b. Harrington, I.E., The Logan Airport Passenger Ground Access Mode Choice Model, Draft Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston, Mass., Feb. 28, 2003. Harrington, I.E., J. McClennen, E. Pereira, and C.-Y. Wang, Summary of People Mover Study Passenger Mode Choice Models, Draft Memorandum, Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston, Mass., May 17, 1996. Harvey, G., “A Study of Airport Access Mode Choice,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 5, Sep. 1986, pp. 525–545. Harvey, G., ACCESS: Models of Airport Access and Airport Choice for the San Francisco Bay Region—Version 1.2, Prepared for the Metropolitan Transportation Commis- sion, Berkeley, Calif., Dec. 1988. Hensher, D.A., “Measurement of the Value of Travel Time Savings,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2001, pp. 71–98. Hensher, D.A., J.M. Rose, and W.H. Greene, Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, England, 2005. Hess, S. and J.W. Polak, “Mixed Logit Modeling of Airport Choice in Multi-Airport Regions,” Journal of Air Trans- port Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2005, pp. 59–68. Hess, S. and J.W. Polak, “Exploring the Potential for Cross- Nesting Structures in Airport-Choice Analysis: A Case Study of the Greater London Area,” Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 42, 2006, pp. 63–81. Howard Humphreys and Partners, Heathrow Surface Access Study, Prepared for the U.K. Department of Transport, Leatherhead, Surrey, England, June 1987. ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc., with Gannett Fleming, Inc., and KPMG Peat Marwick, Miami Intermodal Center: Travel Demand Forecast Report, Prepared for Florida Department

79 of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, Miami, Aug. 1995. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005, Current Population Report P60-231, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2006. Karasmaa, N., The Transferability of Travel Demand Mod- els: An Analysis of Transfer Methods, Data Quality and Model Estimation, Transportation Engineering Publica- tion 106, Dissertation for Degree of Doctor of Science in Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland, 2003. Kumar, A., “Pivot Point Modeling Procedures in Demand Estimation,” Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 106, No. TE6, Nov. 1980, pp. 647–660. Lam, T.C. and K.A. Small, “The Value of Travel Time and Reliability: Measurement for a Value Pricing Experi- ment,” Transportation Research, Part E, Vol. 37, 2001, pp. 231–251. Leake, G.R. and J.R. Underwood, “An Inter-City Terminal Access Modal Choice Model,” Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, Sep. 1977, pp. 11–21. Leigh Fisher Associates, with M.A. Coogan and Market- Sense, TCRP Report 62: Improving Public Transporta- tion Access to Large Airports, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, 148 pp. Lu, X.-Y., G.D. Gosling, S.E. Shladover, J. Xiong, and A. Ceder, Development of a Modeling Framework for Analyz- ing Improvements in Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports, California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS- PRR-2006-14, Institute of Transportation Studies, Univer- sity of California, Berkeley, July 2006. Lunsford, M.E. and G.D. Gosling, Airport Choice and Ground Access Mode Choice Models: A Review and Analysis of Selected Literature, Working Paper UCB-ITS- WP-94-5, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., June 1994. Mandel, B.N., “The Interdependency of Airport Choice and Travel Demand,” In Taking Stock of Air Liberalization, M. Gaudry and R. Mayes, Eds., Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass., 1999, pp. 189–222. McCoomb, L.A., “Analysis of the Transferability of Disag- gregate Demand Models Among Ten Canadian Cities,” Transportation Forum, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19–32. McFadden, D., A.P. Talvitie, and Associates, “Transferabil- ity of Mode-Choice Models of Urban Travel,” Part IV, Chapter 5 of Demand Model Estimation and Forecasting, Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, Phase 1 Final Report Series, Vol. V, Special Report UCB-ITS-SR-77-9, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of Califor- nia, Berkeley and Irvine, 1977. Meyer, M.D. and E.J. Miller, Urban Transportation Plan- ning: A Decision-Oriented Approach, McGraw–Hill, New York, N.Y., 1984, pp. 237–238. Miami Intermodal Center Final Environmental Impact State- ment, Report FHWA-FLA-EIS-95-01-F, U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Fla., Dec. 23, 1997. Model Documentation: Mobility 2030 Regional Transporta- tion Plan, Atlanta Regional Commission, Atlanta, Ga., Feb. 11, 2005. Mohring, H., J. Schroeter, and P. Wiboonchutikula, “The Values of Waiting Time, Travel Time, and a Seat on the Bus,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1987, pp. 40–56. Monteiro, A.B. and M. Hansen, “Improvements to Airport Ground Access and the Behavior of a Multiple Airport System: BART Extension to San Francisco International Airport,” Transportation Research Record 1562, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 38–47. Moreau, A., “Public Transport Waiting Times as Experi- enced by Customers: Marketing Research Involving the Grenoble System,” Public Transport International, Vol. 41, No. 3, 1992, pp. 52–68. Papacostas, C.S., Fundamentals of Transportation Engi- neering, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1987, pp. 276–279. Parsons Brinckerhoff, with Lea+Elliott, Inc., JKH Mobility Services, and Infrastructure Services, Inc., Central Area Loop Study, Final Report, Prepared for the Ohio– Kentucky–Indiana Regional Council of Governments, Cincinnati, Ohio, Dec. 2001. Parsons/SYSTRA Engineering, Inc., Lower Manhattan Air- port and Commuter Access Alternatives Analysis, Final Report, Prepared for the Lower Manhattan Develop- ment Corporation, New York, N.Y., n.d. [Online]. Avail- able: http://mta.info/mta/planning/lmlink/alternatives.htm [Mar. 28, 2007]. Pas, E.I. and F.S. Koppelman, “Comparative Analysis of the Transferability of Disaggregate Automobile-Ownership and Mode-Choice Models,” Transportation Research Record 987, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1984, pp. 40–48. Pearson, D., Houston Intercontinental Airport Travel Survey, Technical Memorandum on Houston–Galveston Travel Surveys, Prepared for Houston–Galveston Area Council, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Dec. 17, 1996. PDX Ground Access Study Model Summary, Prepared by the Travel Forecasting Staff, Portland Metro, Portland, Ore., May 1998. Pels, E., P. Nijkamp, and P. Rietveld, “Access to and Com- petition Between Airports: A Case Study for the San Francisco Bay Area,” Transportation Research, Vol. 37A, No. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 71–83. Psaraki, V. and C. Abacoumkin, “Access Mode Choice for Relocated Airports: The New Athens International Air- port,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 8, 2002, pp. 89–98. Purvis, C.L., Travel Demand Models for the San Francisco Bay Area (BAYCAST-90): Technical Summary, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., June 1997.

Request for Business Case: Air Rail Link from Toronto–Lester B. Pearson International Airport to Toronto Union Station, Transport Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, May 2003. Resource Systems Group, Inc., O’Hare and Midway Airport Express Train Ridership Forecasting Study: Chicago Air Traveler Stated Preference Survey Report, Prepared for Chicago Department of Transportation, White River Junction, Vt., Jan. 2004. Ricard, D.M., “Challenges in Developing an Airport Employee Commute Program: Case Study of Boston Logan International Airport,” Transportation Re- search Record 1506, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 70–81. Rossi, T.F. and M.L. Outwater, “How Valid Is it to Transfer Mode Choice Model Parameters,” Proceedings of the Seventh TRB Conference on the Application of Trans- portation Planning Methods, Boston, Mass., Mar. 7–11, 1999, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Sep. 1999. Sacramento International Airport Transit Access Study, Report No. SACOG-00-014, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Sacramento, Calif., July 20, 2000. Small, K.A., Urban Transportation Economics, Harwood Academic Publishers, Reading, England, 1992. Sobieniak, J., R. Westin, T. Rosapep, and T. Shin, “Choice of Access Mode to Intercity Terminals,” Transportation Research Record 728, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1979, pp. 47–53. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), RADAM Airport Demand Allocation Model—Basic De- scription, A Discussion Paper for the SCAG Aviation Task Force RADAM Model Workshop, Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 17, 2002. 80 Spear, B.D., An Analysis of the Demand for Airport Bus Services at Washington National and Dulles Airports, Report DOT-TSC-FAA-84-2, Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge, Mass., May 1984. Tambi, J.E. and J. Falcocchio, “Implications of Parking Pol- icy for Airport Access Mode Choice,” Presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13–17, 1991. Train, K.E., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003. Travel Demand Model Documentation, Atlanta Regional Commission, Atlanta, Ga., May 2006. U.S. Federal Transit Administration, Travel Forecasting for New Starts, Presentation at a Workshop on Travel Fore- casting for New Starts Proposals, Minneapolis, Minn., June 15–16, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/ printer_friendly/planning_environment_5402.html. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Determination of the State of the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting: Find- ings of the Surveys of Metropolitan Planning Organiza- tions, Prepared for Committee B0090, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., Draft, revised Apr. 7, 2006. Waddell, P., M. Outwater, C. Bhat, and L. Blain, “Design of an Integrated Land Use and Activity-Based Travel Model System for the Puget Sound Region,” Presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 13–17, 2002. Wilbur Smith Associates, in association with Resource Sys- tems Group, Inc., Airport Express Ridership and Revenue Forecast, Prepared for Chicago Department of Trans- portation, Chicago, Ill., 2004.

Next: Bibliography »
Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models Get This Book
×
 Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Airport Cooperative Highway Research Program (ACRP) Synthesis 5: Airport ground Access Mode Choice Models examines the characteristics of existing ground access mode choice models and explores the issues involved in the development and use of such models to improve the understanding and acceptance of their role in airport planning and management.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!