Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management (2004)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

31 BIBLIOGRAPHY A Handbook of Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreements in Iowa, Institute of Public Affairs, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1976. Association for Conflict Resolution, Best Practices for Government Agencies: Guidelines for Using Collabora- tive Agreement-Seeking Processes, Environment/Public Disputes Sector Critical Issues Committee, Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution, Washington, D.C., 2002. Bazerman, J.B. and K. Shonk, You Can't Enlarge the Pie: Six Barriers to Effective Government, Basic Books, New York, N.Y., 2001. Bellomo, S., “Access Management through Public–Private Cooperation: The Bridgewater Commons (NJ) Case Study,” Proceedings of the First National Conference on Access Management, Vail, Colo., Aug. 1–4, 1993, pp. 259–262. Carlson, D. and S. King, Linking Transportation and Land Use by Fostering Inter-Jurisdictional Cooperation, In- stitute for Public Policy and Management, Seattle, Wash., 1998. Cooperative Agreements for and Amongst Cities and Vil- lages in Michigan, Michigan City Management Asso- ciation, Michigan Municipal League, Lansing, July 1996. Cope, R.S., “Annexation Agreements—Boundary Agree- ments: Walking a Fine Line into the Future—A Map of Dangers to the Unwary Land Use Traveler,” Northern Illinois University Law Review, Vol. 17, 1997, pp. 377– 397. Davidson, M., “The Roads to Be Traveled: Planning and Preserving Transportation Corridors,” PAS Memo, July 1998. Feiden, W. and R.J. Burby, “Elements of Financial Per- formance Guarantees,” Public Investment News, Sep. 2002. Ferranti, S.R. and G. Benway, “The Challenges and (Early Successes) of a Town-Initiated Access Management ‘Retrofit’ Program on Two State Highways,” Proceed- ings of the Second National Conference on Access Man- agement, Aug. 11–14, 1996, pp. 207–215. Fisher, P.E., “Regional Service Delivery,” Hampton Roads Review, No. 16, Oct.–Dec. 1994, p. 1. Fisher, R. and W. Ury, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agree- ments Without Giving In, Penguin Books, New York, N.Y., 1981. Hattan, D.E., T.S. Frisbie, R.W. Felsburg, and J.R. Kullman, “US 85 Access Control Plan,” Proceedings of the ITE 2001 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Institute of Transpor- tation Engineers, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2001. Huffman, C., “Retrofit of a Major Urban Corridor, US-54 Highway in Wichita, Kansas, an Intergovernmental Partnership Under the Kansas Department of Transpor- tation’s Corridor Management Program,” Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Access Management, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2000, pp. 389–395. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher, “Consensus Building and Com- plex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Col- laborative Planning,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 65, Autumn 1999, pp. 412–423. Intergovernmental Agreement for US-85 Access Control Plan (draft), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), CDOT, Denver, May 1999. Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Du- rango and the State of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), CDOT, Denver, 1997. Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Louis- ville, the County of Boulder, and the State of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), CDOT, Denver, 1992. Intergovernmental Agreement Among the City of Durango, La Plata County, and the State of Colorado Department of Transportation (draft), Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), CDOT, Denver, 1995. Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Fort Collins and the State of Colorado Department of High- ways, Colorado Department of Highways, Denver, 1988. Intergovernmental Cooperation: Case Studies in Southeast Michigan, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Metropolitan Affairs Corporation, Detroit, Sep. 1994. International City/County Management Association, “Re- gional Strategies for Local Government Management,” Case Study, Management Information Service Report, Vol. 24, No. 3, Mar. 1992. International City/County Management Association, “Trends and Issues in the Use of Intergovernmental Agreements and Privatization in Local Government (Survey),” Baseline Data Report, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1989. Inventory of Shared Services and Intergovernmental Coop- eration, San Mateo County City Managers Association, Mar. 21, 1991. Joint Participation Agreement Between the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Flagler County, FDOT, Tallahassee, undated. Joint Resolution: US 19 Corridor Access Management Strategy 2001, Levy County Commission, Chiefland City Commission, Fanning Springs City Council, Flor- ida, 2001. Kurtz, T.S., Intergovernmental Cooperation Handbook, Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Local Government Services, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, July 1992, p. 9. Linkes, C., “Public Partnership—Kentucky’s Paris Pike Reconstruction Project,” AASHTO Quarterly Magazine, Vol. 78, Spring 1999, pp. 31–35.

32 McCreary, S. and A. McInerny, “Negotiating Agreements for Integrated Flood Control: Guadalupe River Flood Control Project Collaborative, Santa Clara Valley, Cali- fornia,” Proceedings of the 1999 National Planning Conference, American Planning Association, Chicago, Ill., 1999. (Provides guidance on drafting effective in- tergovernmental agreements.) Memorandum of Understanding (draft), Florida Depart- ment of Transportation, Tampa, Apr. 2001. Memorandum of Understanding Relating to Highway Im- provement Planning by and between Massachusetts De- partment of Public Works, City of Peabody, Town of Danvers, Town of Lynnfield, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, 1990. Memorandum of Understanding, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka, 1997. Mnookin, R.H. and L.E. Susskind (eds.), Negotiating on Behalf of Others: Advice to Lawyers, Business Execu- tives, Sports Agents, Diplomats, Politicians, and Every- one Else, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1999, 344 pp. Mnookin, R.H., S.R. Peppet, and A.S. Tulumello, Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Dis- pute, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000, 368 pp. Morris, M., “Joint Economic Development Zones and Dis- tricts,” Public Investment News, June 1996. Nunn, S. and M.S. Rosentraub, “Dimensions of Interjuris- dictional Cooperation,” Journal of the American Plan- ning Association, Vol. 63, Spring 1997, pp. 205–219. Park, K., “Friends and Competitors: Policy Interactions Be- tween Local Governments in Metropolitan Areas,” Po- litical Research Quarterly, Vol. 50, Dec. 1997, pp. 723– 750. Parsons, D., Memorandum: Regional Inventory of Intergov- ernmental Agreements, Denver Regional Council of Governments, Denver, Colo., Nov. 2, 1992. Schaller, B., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 297: Building Effective Relationships Between Central Cities and Regional, State, and Federal Agencies, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 2001, 69 pp. Scheib, D., “A Case Study of Maryland’s Access Manage- ment Program,” Proceedings of the Fifth National Con- ference on Access Management, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., June 2002. Schwab, J., “When Cities and Counties Cooperate,” Zoning News, Nov. 1993. Smith, A.G., Intergovernmental Innovations in South Caro- lina, South Carolina Advisory Commission on Intergov- ernmental Relations, Columbia, June 1990. State and Local Roles in the Federal System, U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 405–406. Substate Regional Governance: Evolution and Manifesta- tions Throughout the United States and Florida, Florida Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations, Jacksonville, Nov. 1991, pp. 125–126. Swan, J., Transportation Research E-Circular, E-C039: Native American Transportation Issues in Arizona: Coordination of State and Tribal Transportation Issues, Sep. 2002, pp. 19–24. US 85 Access Control Plan, Colorado Department of Transportation, Greeley, Sep. 1998. West, B.E. and D. DeFronzo, Local Government Coopera- tive Ventures in Connecticut, Connecticut Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Hartford, Conn., June 1996. Williams, K.M., J.H. Kramer, and I. Nikitopoulos, An Ac- cess Management Strategy for the US 19 Highway Cor- ridor, Center for Urban Transportation Research, Uni- versity of South Florida, Tampa, 2002, 29 pp.