Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management (2004)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

30 REFERENCES 1. Williams, K., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 289: Corridor Management, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 2000, 58 pp. 2. Atkins, P., Local Intergovernmental Agreements: Strategies for Cooperation, International City/ County Management Association, MIS Report, Vol. 29, No. 7, July 1997, 12 pp. 3. Official Website for the City of Fort Worth, Texas [Online]. Available: www.fortworthgov.org/develop- ment/app-forms. 4. Callies, D., “Solutions After Dolan: Land Develop- ment Agreements,” Land Use Law & Zoning Digest, Vol. 49, No. 10, Oct. 1997. 5. Godschalk, D.R., D.W. Parham, D.R. Porter, W.R. Po- tapchuk, and S.W. Schukraft, Pulling Together: A Plan- ning and Development Consensus-Building Manual, Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., 1994, 145 pp. 6. “Accepting, Supporting, and Adopting the TH 10/TH 24 Interregional Corridor Management Plan,” Ben- ton County Resolution 2002-#16, Benton County, Minn., Apr. 2002. 7. Access Management Plan for State Highway 60/Dave Ward Drive, State of Arkansas, City of Conway, and Metroplan, Jan. 2000. 8. Memorandum of Understanding: Intent to Conduct a Corridor Study, South Dakota Department of Trans- portation, Meade County, Pennington County, and the Rapid City MPO. 9. Memorandum of Understanding between the Utah Department of Transportation and Robert Baxter, Principal of Great Oaks, LLC, Mar. 1, 2000. 10. Greater Houston Transportation and Emergency Management Center, Houston, 2004 [Online]. Avail- able: www.houstontranstar.org. 11. Agreement for Future Shared Access for Ossine Shoes and Gifts, Between the Utah Department of Transportation and Kun Cha and Hyok Hwan O. 12. Rivkin Associates, Corridor Preservation: Case Studies and Analysis Factors in Decision-Making, Office of Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996, p. 151. 13. Memorandum of Understanding, Utah Department of Transportation and Great Oaks, LLC, Mar. 8, 2003. 14. Intergovernmental Agreement Among Adams County, the City of Brighton, the City of Commerce City, the Town of Eaton, the City of Evans, the City of Fort Lupton, the Town of Gilchrest, the City of Greeley, the Town of LaSalle, the Town of Plattville, Weld County, and the State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1999. 15. “Resolution Endorsing Vision and Corridor Man- agement Plan for TH 10/TH 24,” Resolution No. 2002-4-96, St. Cloud, Minn., Apr. 8, 2002. 16. Williams, K. and M. Marshall, Intergovernmental Coordination in Access Management—A Discussion Paper, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, 1998. 17. Model Interlocal Agreement Between Washington State Department of Transportation and County or City for Mitigation of Land Development Impacts, Appendix 14, Washington State Department of Transportation Developer Services Manual, Olym- pia, May 2003. 18. Miscellaneous Contracts and Agreements No. 19,603, State of Oregon and City of Portland, 2003. 19. Colorado Intergovernmental Agreement Model, State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, May 6, 2003. 20. Draft Local Agency Agreement Hazard Elimination Program Project, State of Oregon Department of Transportation and City of Portland, Draft 12-03- 02. 21. Kurtz, T., Intergovernmental Cooperation Handbook, 5th ed., Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, Harrisburg, 2002. 22. “The 91 Express Lanes: A Proven Solution to Traffic Congestion,” California Private Transportation Company, April 2002, Provided by California De- partment of Transportation, Toll Operations Branch Resources [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/ hq/traffops/hwybrdg/tollbridge. 23. Caltrans, “Freeway Agreements” Chapter 24, In Pro- ject Development Procedures Manual (PDPM), Sacramento, 1999, 22 pp. 24. Williams, K., “Coordinating Jurisdiction on Indian Reservations,” Planning & Zoning News, Vol. 10, No. 12, Oct. 1992, p. 13.