National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Contents
Page 10
Suggested Citation:"Summary ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24612.
×
Page 10
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"Summary ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24612.
×
Page 11
Page 12
Suggested Citation:"Summary ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24612.
×
Page 12

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

10 Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft sampling lines going back to the AML and trailer. The tripod is weighted with sandbags before any measurement. A test matrix was constructed to guide the measurements. This test matrix, reproduced in Appendix B, was used by a cockpit observer to direct the engine test and note relevant cockpit parameters. A key development in this testing procedure was the addition of “return to idle” points between each high-power state. The aircraft engine can be idled for long periods on the ground, allowing the measurement team the time to gain an understanding of the “idle signa- ture” and allowing for the cockpit observer to collect information on the aircraft and engine and describe the next test point. Idle then provided a chemical marker defining the beginning and end of the higher engine states, which can only be accessed for short periods on the ground without overheating. Live, preliminary analysis of the emission ratios was performed by a scientist sitting in the pas- senger seat in the AML. This scientist could then determine whether data was of sufficient qual- ity to proceed with the next test point. Communication with the cockpit observer was achieved through radio communication or SMS messaging. These test procedures allowed an experienced scientist team and a pilot without any previous ground-testing experience to complete a full engine test in less than 15 minutes. Figure 2-4. Ideal geometry for engine testing. The aircraft test is performed next to an unused taxiway. The exhaust and propeller wash are directed into an open field with no buildings or aircraft. The probe is placed just off the taxiway. The measurement equipment (the white truck) is out of the way.

11 Trends in Emission Indices By design, gas turbine engines installed in turboprop and turbofan (jet) aircraft operate in a pre- scribed manner. The combustion in these engines is well controlled by aircraft computers, and there is a strong link between the power produced by an engine and the resulting emissions. In contrast, piston engines, which drive small propeller planes, operate in a much more flexible manner. Piston engines are rugged and imprecise and pilots can operate them in various ways with simple levers (e.g., the throttle and mixer) in the cockpit. Power and emissions are weakly linked, particularly in low-power states like idle and taxi. The nature of piston engines means that there is also a great deal of variability in their emissions, even for the same pilot operating the same airplane. Gas Turbine Engines Gas turbine engines operate in a very controlled manner. Engine operation is always lean (excess air) and combustion efficiency is high throughout the range of operational states. Fig- ure 3-1 shows the expected trends in emission indices. This schematic was constructed based on trends observed during a 2006 field study of a General Electric CFM56-2-C1 jet engine (Anderson et al. 2006). HC and CO drop off precipitously above taxi, while NOx emissions increase steadily with power. For ACRP Project 02-54, the researchers measured gaseous and particulate emissions from four gas turbine aircraft engines: • A TPE331-6-252B turboprop engine from Garrett AiResearch, • A PT6A-60A turboprop engine from Pratt & Whitney, • A FJ44-1AP turbofan engine from Williams International, and • A CF34-3A1 turbofan engine from General Electric. Among these measurements, the CF34-3A1 and TPE331 engine tests were performed with a cockpit observer and well-defined engine states (the other two jets were fortuitous measure- ments), so the trends in emissions from these two engines were investigated as a function of engine state. Figure 3-2 shows the emission indices of gas-phase species. The CO EIs and HC EIs decrease with engine thrust for both the CF34 jet and the TPE331 turboprop, while NOx EIs increase with engine thrust. This inverse-correlation of NOx to CO and HC is primarily due to incomplete combustion at lower combustor temperatures, leading to the appreciable production of CO and unburned hydrocarbons. As the combustor temperature increases at high power, the CO and HC emissions are minimized and the NOx emission index increases. Figure 3-2 shows that both the emissions magnitude and trends for CO and NOx EIs are similar among the very different gas turbines. However, although the trends are similar for the C H A P T E R 3

12 Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft HC emissions, the Garrett AiResearch TPE331 turboprop engine has systematically higher HC emissions than the GE CF34 jet by about 8 g/kg fuel. Data for the General Electric CF34 jet is available in the ICAO database (ICAO 2013). Fig- ure 3-3 shows a plot of these certified EI values for the CF34 engine along with the research team’s data. Except for the approach power condition, the ACRP Project 02-54 research team’s results are in relatively good agreement with the ICAO-certified CF34 EIs. For instance, at idle, EIs of CO, HC, and NOx from the ICAO emission data bank are 42.6, 3.95, and 3.85 g/kg fuel, respectively. The research team obtained EIs of CO, HC, and NOx of 67, 2.8, and 3.5 g/kg fuel, respectively. The ICAO values are averaged over several minutes of engine operation and use engine testing rigs (not in-use aircraft) and multiple sampling probes. All of these sampling differences may explain why the research team’s instantaneous approach readings with a single sampling probe differ from ICAO’s published values. Figure 3-1. The trends in emissions for gas turbine engines. 0.1 1 10 100 E Is [g /k g F ue l] 100806040200 percent maximum fuel flow [%] HC, CO, NOx General Electric CF34 Garrett AiResearch TPE331 Figure 3-2. Emission indices of CO, HC, and NOx for jet (CF34) and turboprop (TPE331) engines.

Next: Chapter 1 - Background »
Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft Get This Book
×
 Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Research Report 164: Exhaust Emissions from In-Use General Aviation Aircraft provides

emissions data

to better understand and estimate general aviation (GA) aircraft emissions. Aircraft emissions data for smaller aircraft such as piston and small turbine-powered aircraft either do not exist or have not been independently verified. The emissions data obtained as a part of this project can be added to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA’s) Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) database of aircraft engines. A

PowerPoint presentation

provides an overview of the findings.

Disclaimer: This spreadsheet is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!