Belluz, J., Plumer, B., & Resnick, B. (2016). The 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists. https://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process (accessed August 27, 2018).
Berger, W. (2016). A More Beautiful Question: The Power of Inquiry to Spark Breakthrough Ideas. New York: Bloomsbury.
Duhigg, C. (2016, February 26). What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team: New research reveals surprising truths about why some groups thrive and others falter. The New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html (accessed August 27, 2018).
Fineberg, J. (2015). Modern Art at the Border of Mind and Brain. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Foster, R. N., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—and How to Successfully Transform Them. New York: Currency/Doubleday.
Klein, J. (2018, July 18). Don’t squish the jellyfish. Capture it with a folding robotic claw. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/science/claw-jellyfish-squid.html (accessed August 31, 2018).
Mâsse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Stokols, D., Taylor, B. K., Marcus, S. E., Morgan, G. D., Hall, K. L., Croyle, R. T., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S151–S160.
Misra, S., Stokols, D., & Cheng, L. (2015). The transdisciplinary orientation scale: Factor structure and relation to integrative quality and scope of scientific publications. Journal of Collaborative Healthcare and Translational Medicine, 3(2), 1042.
NAKFI (National Academies Keck Futures Initiative). (2008). National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: Appraising the progress of the first five years. (Internal report).
NAKFI. (2014). National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: Reflecting on the past, planning for the future. (Internal Report).
NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2018). Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25038.
NASEM. (2018a). The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branches from the Same Tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24988.
NASEM. (2018b). The Next Generation of Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences Researchers: Breaking Through. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25008.
National Academies. (2002). The National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: A proposal to the W. M. Keck Foundation. Washington, DC (Internal Report).
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153.
NRC (National Research Council). (2014). Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18722.
NRC. (2015). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concept to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.
Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., & Heberger, A. E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X364553.
Wellbery, C. (2015). Art-Science Collaborations: Avenues toward medical innovation. New England Journal of Medicine, 373, 495–2497. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1509788.
W. M. Keck Foundation. (1999). Promising directions. https://www.issuelab.org/resources/11718/11718.pdf.