National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Epilogue: Beyond Boundaries
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2018. Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25239.
×

Image

References

Belluz, J., Plumer, B., & Resnick, B. (2016). The 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists. https://www.vox.com/2016/7/14/12016710/science-challeges-research-funding-peer-review-process (accessed August 27, 2018).

Berger, W. (2016). A More Beautiful Question: The Power of Inquiry to Spark Breakthrough Ideas. New York: Bloomsbury.

Duhigg, C. (2016, February 26). What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team: New research reveals surprising truths about why some groups thrive and others falter. The New York Times.https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html (accessed August 27, 2018).

Fineberg, J. (2015). Modern Art at the Border of Mind and Brain. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Foster, R. N., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market—and How to Successfully Transform Them. New York: Currency/Doubleday.

Klein, J. (2018, July 18). Don’t squish the jellyfish. Capture it with a folding robotic claw. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/science/claw-jellyfish-squid.html (accessed August 31, 2018).

Mâsse, L. C., Moser, R. P., Stokols, D., Taylor, B. K., Marcus, S. E., Morgan, G. D., Hall, K. L., Croyle, R. T., & Trochim, W. M. (2008). Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S151–S160.

Misra, S., Stokols, D., & Cheng, L. (2015). The transdisciplinary orientation scale: Factor structure and relation to integrative quality and scope of scientific publications. Journal of Collaborative Healthcare and Translational Medicine, 3(2), 1042.

NAKFI (National Academies Keck Futures Initiative). (2008). National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: Appraising the progress of the first five years. (Internal report).

NAKFI. (2014). National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: Reflecting on the past, planning for the future. (Internal Report).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2018. Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25239.
×

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). (2018). Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25038.

NASEM. (2018a). The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branches from the Same Tree. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24988.

NASEM. (2018b). The Next Generation of Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences Researchers: Breaking Through. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25008.

National Academies. (2002). The National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: A proposal to the W. M. Keck Foundation. Washington, DC (Internal Report).

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153.

NRC (National Research Council). (2014). Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18722.

NRC. (2015). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/19007.

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concept to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.

Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., Roessner, J. D., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117–147.

Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., & Heberger, A. E. (2008). How interdisciplinary is a given body of research? Research Evaluation, 17(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X364553.

Wellbery, C. (2015). Art-Science Collaborations: Avenues toward medical innovation. New England Journal of Medicine, 373, 495–2497. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1509788.

W. M. Keck Foundation. (1999). Promising directions. https://www.issuelab.org/resources/11718/11718.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2018. Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25239.
×
Page 111
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2018. Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25239.
×
Page 112
Next: Appendix I: Governance and Conference Steering Committees »
Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $115.00 Buy Ebook | $89.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This publication represents the culmination of the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative (NAKFI), a program of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Academy of Medicine supported by a 15-year, $40 million grant from the W. M. Keck Foundation to advance the future of science through interdisciplinary research. From 2003 to 2017, more than 2,000 researchers and other professionals across disciplines and sectors attended an annual “think-tank” style conference to contemplate real-world challenges. Seed grants awarded to conference participants enabled further pursuit of bold, new research and ideas generated at the conference.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!