Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
1 Introduction1 On October 3, 2018, the Roundtable on Population Health Improve- ment of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medi- cine (the National Academies) and the Interdisciplinary Association for P Â opulation Health Science (IAPHS) convened a joint symposium to con- sider the current state of population health science in the United States. The symposium was held in Washington, DC, at the National Academy of Â Sciences building in coordinaÂ ion with the IAPHS annual meeting. Sanne t Magnan, senior fellow at HealthPartners Institute, said that the goal of the symposium was to reflect on trends in population health, the state of the science, and effective policy. The intent was not to consider specific programs or activities, she explained, but rather to reflect in broad terms on challenges and future direction(s) for the field. 1This joint symposium was organized by an independent planning committee whose role was limited to identification of topics and speakers. This proceedings was prepared by the rapporteur as a factual summary of the presentations and discussions that took place at the symposium. Statements, recommendations, and opinions expressed are those of individual presenters and participants and are not necessarily endorsed or verified by the National Academies, the roundtable, or IAPHS, and they should not be construed as reflecting any group consensus. 1 PREPUBLICATION COPYâUncorrected Proofs
2 POPULATION HEALTH SCIENCE IN THE UNITED STATES SYMPOSIUM OBJECTIVES Since 2013, the Roundtable on Population Health Improvement has been convening workshops for members, stakeholders, and the public to discuss issues of importance to improving the nationâs health. The round- tableâs vision is of a strong, healthy, and productive society that cultivates human capital and equal opportunity. This vision rests on the recognition that outcomes such as improved life expectancy, quality of life, and health for all are shaped by interdependent social, economic, environmental, genetic, behavioral, and health care factors, and that achieving this vision will require robust national and community-based policies and depend- able resources. The agenda for the joint symposium was developed by an indepen- dent planning committee with assistance from roundtable and IAPHS staff. Planning committee members included Allison Aiello, Bob Â ummer, H David Kindig, Paula Lantz, Lourdes Rodriguez, and Sanne Magnan. (The planning committeeâs Statement of Task is provided in Box 1-1.) As described by Bruce Link, distinguished professor of public policy and sociology at the University of California, Riverside, and president of IAPHS, the objectives of the symposium were the following: â¢ Highlight major trends and patterns in U.S. population health and challenges to current thinking, including socioeconomic, gender, racial, ethnic, and other social disparities; â¢ Explore how population health science could inform policy to improve outcomes and how policies can have unintended conse- quences if not grounded in research and evaluation; and â¢ Showcase perspectives on how to build common ground for devel- opment and implementation of effective policy based on science. ORGANIZATION OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND PROCEEDINGS This joint symposium of the Roundtable on Population Health Improvement and IAPHS was the agenda item for the first part of the 2018 IAPHS annual meeting. The symposium opened with an overview of population health in the United States, including current trends in health and mortality, and racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities (Chap- ter 2). The discussion then turned to the complexities of policy implemen- tation with attention to evidence generation and to surfacing and mitigat- ing negative unintended consequences of policies for population health (Chapter 3). In the final panel of the symposium, speakers representing city-, state-, and federal-level agencies shared their perspectives on find- ing common ground to move population health forward (Chapter 4). The PREPUBLICATION COPYâUncorrected Proofs
INTRODUCTION 3 BOX 1-1 Planning Committee Statement of Task An ad hoc planning committee will plan and convene a part-day public work- shop focused on interdisciplinary approaches to and perspectives on key Âssues in i population health science. The committee will define meeting objectives, produce an agenda, and identify appropriate speakers. The workshop will focus on explor- ing (1) the policy implications of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in the U.S. population and the role of researchers; (2) the state of science and evidence in population health; and (3) the status, gaps, and future frontiers in building com- mon ground between population health science and policy. Proceedings of the Â presentations and discussion at the workshop will be prepared by a designated rapporteur in accordance with institutional guidelines. symposium concluded with observations and reflections shared by David Kindig (Chapter 5). Points of interest were shared on Twitter throughout the day by participants using the hashtag #pophealthrt.2 2The Twitter discussion that took place on October 3, 2018, in association with the joint symposium can be viewed at https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pophealthrt (accessed Decem- ber 23, 2020). PREPUBLICATION COPYâUncorrected Proofs
PREPUBLICATION COPYâUncorrected Proofs