Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
182 Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies A P P E N D I X E (California DOT 2013) Figure E-1. Flowchart for California ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 183 (Florida DOT 2017) Figure E-2. Flowchart for Stage 1 of Florida ICE policy.
184 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Florida DOT 2017) Figure E-3. Flowchart for Stage 2 of Florida ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 185 (Florida DOT 2017) Figure E-4. Flowchart for Stage 3 of Florida ICE policy.
186 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Georgia DOT 2017) Figure E-5. Flowchart for Stage 1 of Georgia ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 187 (Georgia DOT 2017) Figure E-6. Flowchart for Stage 2 of Georgia ICE policy.
188 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Bowen et al. 2014) Figure E-7. Flowchart for Stage 1 of Indiana ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 189 (Bowen et al. 2014) Figure E-8. Flowchart for Stage 2 of Indiana ICE policy.
190 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Minnesota DOT 2017a) Figure E-9. Flowchart for Minnesota ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 191 (Inda 2018) Figure E-10. Summary table from Nevada ICE policy. The authors believe this table is a template, which is why the â#â symbol is shown instead of numerical values. The blank cell in the second column is appropriate, as there would be no delivery timeframe for existing conditions since there would be no project.
192 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Pennsylvania DOT 2017) Figure E-11. Flowchart for Stage 1 of Pennsylvania ICE policy.
Example Flowcharts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 193 (Pennsylvania DOT 2017) Figure E-12. Flowchart for Stage 2 of Pennsylvania ICE policy.
194 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Pennsylvania DOT 2017) Figure E-13. Flowchart for Stage 3 of Pennsylvania ICE policy.
Exam ple Flow charts and Tables from Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Policies 195 (Wisconsin DOT 2018) Figure E-14. Brainstorming worksheet for Stage 1 of Wisconsin ICE policy.
196 Alternative Intersection Design and Selection (Wisconsin DOT 2018) Figure E-15. Summary tables for Stage 2 of Wisconsin ICE policy.
