Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
References AFA (Air Force Association). 2000. Shortchanging the Future: Air Force Research and Development Demands Investment. Arlington, Va.: Air Force Association Science and Technology Committee, January 2000. AFRL (Air Force Research Laboratory). 1999. Science and Technology Workforce for the 21st Century (STW-21). Briefing charts. Dayton, Ohio: Air Force Research Laboratory, circa October 1999. gorger, W.U. 2002. Technology Availability and Flexibility. Presentation by Dr. William U. gorger, Director, Plans and Programs Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, to the National Research Council Com- mittee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force Science & Technol- ogy Program Changes, Dayton, Ohio, June 27, 2002. Brandt, J. 2002. Air Force S&T Planning Review. Presentation by Lt. Col. Jim Brandt, Science and Technology Division, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology and Engi- neering, to the National Research Council Committee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force S&T Program Changes, Arlington, Va., May 31, 2002. Carlson, H. 2002. AFOSR Overview. Presentation by Herb Carlson, Chief Scientist, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, to the Air Force Sci- ence and Technology Board, National Research Council, Arlington, Va., May 29, 2002. DoD (Department of Defense).2001. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, September 30, 2001. DoD. 2002a. National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2003. Washing- ton, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), March 2002. DoD. 2002b. RDT&E Programs (R-1): Department of Defense Budget Fis- cal Year 2003. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), February 2002. DSB (Defense Science Board).2000. Defense Science Board Report on the Adequacy of the DoD Science and Technology (S&T) Program (letter report). Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board, June 2000. DSB. 2002. Defense Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board, May 2002. GAO (General Accounting Office). 1999. Better Management of Technol- ogy Development Can Improve Weapon System Outcomes. GAO/ NSAID-99-162. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office, July 1999. GAO. 2002. Science and Technology: Air Force's Planning Process Meets Statutory Requirement. GAO-02-273. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office, February 2002. 42 Hunsberger, S. 2002. Personal communication from Susan Hunsberger, Office of the Director Defense Research and Engineering (Plans and Programs). Washington, D.C.: June 18, 2002. Jones, R.M. 2002. Appropriators complete FY 2003 defense funding bill. FYI Bulletin of Science Policy News, No. 111. Washington, D.C.: The American Institute of Physics, October 10, 2002. Lackie, K. 2002. Science and Technology Community in Crisis. Presenta- tion by Kenneth Lackie, Executive Secretary, Naval Research Advisory Committee Panel on Science and Technology Community in Crisis, to the National Research Council Committee on Review of the Effective- ness of Air Force S&T Program Changes, Washington, D.C., August 23, 2002. Legault, J. 2002. Personal communication from Jill Legault, Air Force Re- search Laboratory, Dayton, Ohio, November 4, 2002. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Office of Aero- space Technology. 2003. Personal communication from C. Brumfield, Deputy Director, Resources Management Division, NASA Office of Aerospace Technology, to Alan Epstein, circa February 26, 2003. Neighbor, T. 1999. AFRL Vision. Presentation by T. Neighbor, Air Force Research Laboratory, Director, Plans and Programs, to the National Research Council Committee on Review of the Department of Defense Air and Space Systems Science and Technology Program, Washington, D.C., December 17, 1999. NRC (National Research Council). 2001a. Review of the U.S. Department of Defense Air, Space, and Supporting Information Systems Science and Technology Program. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC.2001b. Review of the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Infrastructure and Aerospace Disciplines to Meet the Needs of the Air Force and Depart- ment of Defense. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001c. Aging Avionics in Military Aircraft. Washington, D.C.: Na- tional Academy Press. NRC.2002. Implications of Emerging Micro- and Nanotechnologies. Wash- ington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Robertson, D. 2002. Personal communication from Lt. Col. Dave Robertson, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology, and Engineering, Washington, D.C., June 19, 2002. Rubertus, G. 2002. AFRL Balanced Investment Strategy. Presentation by Greg Rubertus, Chief, Corporate Investment Strategy Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, to the National Research Council Commit- tee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force Science and Technol- ogy Program Changes, Arlington, Va., May 31, 2002. Ruck, H. 2002. Air Force Expectations and Overview. Presentation by Henk
REFERENCES Ruck, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Sci- ence, Technology, and Engineering, to the National Research Council Committee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force Science and Technology Program Changes, Arlington, Va., May 30, 2002. SAB (Scientific Advisory Board). 2001. Report on Science and Technol- ogy and the Air Force Vision: Achieving a More Effective S&T Pro- gram. Washington, D.C.: United States Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, May 2001. Schneider, G. 2002a. Scope of Concerns from Congress, SAB, DSB, and AFA About Management of the Air Force S&T Program. Presentation by Col. Greg Schneider, Chief, Science and Technology Division, Of- fice of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology, and Engineering, to the National Research Council Com- mittee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force S&T Program Changes, Arlington, Va., May 30, 2002. Schneider, G. 2002b. Addressing the Concerns Related to the Air Force Science and Technology Program. Presentation by Col. Greg Scheinder, Chief, Science and Technology Division, Office of the Deputy Assis- tant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology, and Engineer- ing, to the National Research Council Committee on Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force S&T Program Changes, Arlington, Va., May 30, 2002. Schulz, D. 2002. Capabilities Planning (Information). Presentation by Col. Diana Schulz, Directorate of Requirements, Headquarters, Air Force Material Command, to the National Research Council Committee on 43 Review of the Effectiveness of Air Force Science and Technology Pro- gram Changes, Dayton, Ohio, June 27, 2002. U.S. Air Force. 1999. Science and Technology Workforce for the 21st Cen- tury. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Chief Scientist of the Air Force, July 1999. U.S. Air Force. 2001. Scientist and Engineer Summit II. Briefing charts from presentations made during Air Force S&E Summit II. Washing- ton, D.C.: Department of the Air Force, December 2001. U.S. Air Force, 2002. Fiscal Year 2003 President's Budget Research, De- velopment, Test and Evaluation Descriptive Summaries: Volume I, Budget Activity 1-3. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Air Force, February 2002. U.S. Congress. 1998. Public Law 105-262: Strom Thurmond National De- fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, October 17, 1998. U.S. Congress. 1999. Public Law 106-65: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, October 5, 1999. U.S. Congress. 2000. Public Law 106-398: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, October 30, 2000. U.S. Congress. 2001. Public Law 107-107: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress, December 28, 2001.
