National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes (2001)

Chapter: Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment

« Previous: Annex C. Participants List, 25 April 2000 Conference
Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×

Page 299

Annex D:

Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment

PUBLISHED PAPERS AND REPORTS

Austin, David and Molly Macauley. 2000 . Estimating Future Consumer Benefits from ATP-Funded Innovation: The Case of Digital Data Storage . NIST GCR 00-790. April.

Branscomb, Lewis M., Kenneth P. Morse, and Michael J. Roberts. 2000 . Managing Technical Risk, Understanding Private Sector Decision Making on Early Stage Technology-based Projects . NIST GCR 00-787. April.

Chang, Connie. 1998 . ATP Eligibility Criteria for U.S. Subsidiaries of Foreign-owned Companies: Legislation, Implementation, and Results . NISTIR 6099. January.

CONSAD Research Corporation. 1997 . Advanced Technology Program Case Study: The Development of Advanced Technologies and Systems for Controlling Dimensional Variation in Automobile Body Manufacturing . NIST GCR 97-709. March.

Ehlen, Mark. 1999 . Economic Impacts of Flow-Control Machining Technology: Early Applications in the Automobile Industry . NISTIR 6373. October.

Etzkowitz, Henry and Richard Spivack. 1999 . Information Infrastructure for Healthcare: An Evaluation of a Government-Industry Technology Development Initiative . NISTIR 6404. October.

Feldman, Maryann P., Maryellen R. Kelley, Joshua Schaff, and Gabriel Farkas. 2000 . Reinforcing Interactions Between the ATP and State Technology Programs, Volume II: Case Studies of Technology Pioneering Start-Up Companies and their Use of State and Federal Programs . NISTIR 6523. November.

Gompers, Paul and Josh Lerner. 1999 . Capital Formation and Investment in Venture Markets: Implications for the Advanced Technology Program . GCR 99-784. December.

Jaffe, Adam B. 1996 . Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the Advanced Technology Program . NIST GCR 97-708. December.

The Journal of Technology Transfer . “Symposium on Evaluating a Public-Private Partnership: The Advanced Technology Program.” 23: 2 , Summer 1998, ISSN 0892-9912. (Special issue devoted to ATP's program evaluation.)

Laidlaw, Frances Jean. Acceleration of Technology Development by the Advanced Technology Program: The Experience of 28 Projects Funded in 1991 . NISTIR 6047. 23 October.

Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×

Page 300

Lide, Bettijoyce and Richard N. Spivack. 2000 . Advanced Technology Program Information Infrastructure for Healthcare Focused Program: A Brief History . NISTIR 6477. February.

Link, Albert N. 1997 . ATP Early Stage Impacts of the Printed Wiring Board Research Joint Venture, Assessed at Project End . NIST GCR 97-722. November.

Long, William F. 1999 . Performance of Completed Projects, Status Report Number 1 . NIST Special Publication 950-1. March.

Mansfield, Edwin. 1996 . Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities . NIST GCR 99-780. January.

Martin, Sheila A. et al. Research Triangle Institute . 1998 . A Framework for Estimating the National Economic Benefits of ATP Funding of Medical Technologies . NIST GCR 97-737. April.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. A Progress Report on the Impacts of an Industry-Government Technology Partnerships . NIST-ATP-96-2. April 1996.

Powell, Jeanne W. 1996 . “The ATP's Business Reporting System: A Tool for Economic Evaluation.” Paper presented at Conference on Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Data. Helsinki, Finland. Published in conference proceedings. June.

Powell, Jeanne W. 1997 . Development, Commercialization, and Diffusion of Enabling Technologies: Progress Report for Projects Funded 1993-1995 . NISTIR 6098. December.

Powell, Jeanne W. 1998 . “Small-Firm Experience in the Advanced Technology Program.” Paper presented at the High Technology Small Firms Conference. The Netherlands : University of Twente . June. Published in conference proceedings.

Powell, Jeanne W. 1999 . Business Planning and Progress of Small Business Firms Engaged in Technology Development Through the Advanced Technology Program . NISTIR 6375. October.

Powell, Jeanne W. and Karen L. Lellock. 2000 . Development, Commercialization, and Diffusion of Enabling Technologies: Progress Report . NISTIR 6375. April.

Ruegg, Rosalie, T. 1996 . Guidelines For Economic Evaluation of the Advanced Technology Program . NISTIR 5896. November.

Ruegg, Rosalie, T. 1997 . “The Advanced Technology Program's Evaluation Plan and Progress.” Paper presented at the 7th International Forum on Technology Management. Kyoto, Japan. November. Published in conference proceedings.

Ruegg, Rosalie T. 1999 . Advanced Technology Program's Approach to Technology Diffusion: Paper presented at Advanced Research Workshop “Industry as a Stimulator of Technology Transfer.” NISTIR 6385. September.

Schachtel, Marsha R.B. and Maryann P. Feldman. 2000 . Reinforcing Interactions Between the Advanced Technology Program and State Technology Programs, Volume I: A Guide to State Business Assistance Programs for New Technology Creation and Commercialization . NIST GCR 00-788. April.

Servo, Jenny C. 2000 . Advanced Technology Program's Commercialization and Business Planning Guide for the Post-Award Period . NIST GCR 99-779. June.

Silber & Associates. 1996 . Survey of Advanced Technology Program 1990-1992 Awardees: Company Opinion About the ATP and its Early Effects . NIST GCR 97-707. January.

Solomon Associates. 1993 . Advanced Technology Program: An Assessment of Short-Term Impacts — First Competition Participants . February.

Spender, J-C. 1997 . “Publically Supported Non-Defense R&D: the USA's Advanced Technology Program.” Science and Public Policy . February. pp. 45-52 .

National Research Council. 1999 . The Advanced Technology Program, Challenges and Opportunities . Charles W. Wessner, editor. Washington D.C. : National Academy Press .

COMPLETED STUDIES—PUBLICATION FORTHCOMING

Dyer, Jeffrey H. and Benjamin C. Powell. Perspectives on Success and the Determinants of Success in ATP-sponsored R&D Joint Ventures: The Views of Participants in 18 Automobile Manufacturing Projects . GCR 00-803.

Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×

Page 301

Feldman, Maryann P. and Maryellen R. Kelley. Winning an Award from the Advanced Technology Program: Pursuing R&D Strategies in the Public Interest and Providing a Halo Effect . NISTIR 6577.

Status Reports of Completed Projects: First 50 . NIST Special Publication XXX.

COMPLETED STUDIES—PUBLICATION PLANNED

Branstetter, Lee G. and Mariko Sakakibara. Impact Assessment of Research Consortia Using Japanese and U.S. Data .

Cohen, Wesley M. and John Walsh. R&D Spillovers, Appropriability, and R&D Intensity: A Survey-Based Approach .

Darby, Michael R., Lynne G. Zucker, David M. Waguespack, Maryellen R. Kelley and Andrew J. Wang. Program Design Effects in the Advanced Technology Program: Joint Venture/Single Participant and University Role in Firm Success .

Fogarty, Michael S., Amit K. Sinha, and Adam B. Jaffe. ATP and the US Innovation System: A Methodology for Identifying Enabling R&D Spillover Networks with Application to Microelectro-mechanical Systems (MEMS) and Optical Recording .

Hall, Bronwyn H., Albert N. Link, and John T. Scott. Universities as Partners in Advanced Technology Program Funded Projects .

Mowery, David C., Joanne E. Oxley, and Brian S. Silverman. Knowledge Spillovers and R&D Joint Ventures .

Trajtenberg, Manuel and Zvi Griliches. R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment .

Vonortas, Nicholas. Business Diversification through Research Joint Venture: Advanced Technology Program .

STUDIES UNDERWAY

Branscomb, Lewis. Between Invention and Innovation: Mapping the Funding for Early Stage Technologies .

Burress, David, Joshua Rosenbloom, and Pat Oslund. Baseline Economic Impacts of the ATP Digital Video Program .

Feldman, Maryann P. The ATP Application Process and Determinants of Applicant Satisfaction .

Kaplan, Bonnie and Richard N. Spivack. Impact of ATP Projects in Healthcare Information Infrastructure .

Kogut, Bruce and Michelle Gittelman. Public-Private Partnering and Innovation Performance among US Biotechnology Firms .

Lichtenberg, Frank and Andrew Wang. Hospital Information Technology and Impact on Healthcare Outcomes .

Link, Albert N. and John T. Scott. Evaluation of ATP's Intramural Funding Program 1990-1999 .

Polenske, Karen, Joel Clark, Richard Roth, Daniel Whitney. Estimating the Contributions to Industry Productivity and the Impacts on the U.S. Economy of ATP Project ‘A Systems Solution to Quality Problems in Auto Body Manufacturing.'

Research Triangle Institute. Benefits and Costs of Projects Funded under ATP's Focused Program on Component-based Software .

Vonortas, Nicholas and Richard Spivack. Succeeding in Collaborative R&D: Two Case Studies of ATP-Sponsored Research Joint Ventures .

Watkins, Todd and Theodore Schlie. Estimating Net Social Benefits of Knowledge and Market Spillovers for ATP Projects in Photonics and Opto-Electronics .

Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×

Page 302

Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×
Page 299
Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×
Page 300
Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×
Page 301
Suggested Citation:"Annex D. Internal and External Reviews of the ATP, Analyses Commissioned by the Office of Economic Assessment." National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10145.
×
Page 302
Next: Annex E. Bibliography »
The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $80.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This report examines the operations of the APT, reviews its extensive assessment program, and provides NRC Committee findings concerning the ATP’s operations and recommendations for potential improvements to the program. The report includes a summary of a major conference held in April 2000 as well as seven papers, including surveys of the industry participants or users of the ATP program, a summary of the results of fifty awards, detailed assessments of major joint ventures, and a description of the current selection process. It is the most comprehensive study to date of the program’s origins, operations, achievements, and assessment. Its conclusion: the program works.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!