National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Epilogue: On Changing Minds
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

References

ABET. (2009). ABET criteria for evaluating engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET.

Abraham, M.R., and Gelder, J.I. (n.d.). Molecular level laboratory experiments (MoLE) Available: http://genchem1.chem.okstate.edu/CCLI/Startup.html.

Abraham, M., Varghese, V., and Tang, H. (2010). Using molecular representations to aid student understanding of stereochemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(12), 1425–1429.

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., and Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.

Allen, D., and Tanner, K. (2002). Approaches in cell biology teaching. Cell Biology Education, 1(1), 3–5.

Amaral, K., Bauer, C., Hanson, D., Hunnicutt, S., Schneider, J., and Yezierski, E. (2005). A white paper for facilitating POGIL activities in large classes. Paper prepared for the POGIL National Meeting, June 13–16, 2005.

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Available: http://visionandchange.org.

American Society for Engineering Education. (n.d.). ASEE Conferences. Available: http://www.asee.org/conferences-and-events/conferences.

Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom assessment technologies, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., and Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company.

Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2014). Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL)—Advancing what works in STEM education. Available: http://www.aacu.org/pkal/educationframework/index.cfm.

Association of American Universities. (2013a, June 25). AAU selects eight campus project sites for Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative. Available: http://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=14474.

Association of American Universities. (2013b). Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative: October 2013 update.

Association of American Universities. (n.d.). AAU Framework for systemic change in undergraduate STEM teaching and learning. Available: https://www.aau.edu/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=14357.

Austin, A.E. (2009, September). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal of Academic Development, 14(3), 173–183.

Austin, A.E. (2011). Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. Paper presented at the Fourth Committee Meeting on Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, March 2011. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Austin, A.E., Connolly, M., and Colbeck, C.L. (2008). Strategies for preparing integrated faculty: The Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning. In C.L. Colbeck, K.A. O’Meara, and A.E. Austin (Eds.), Educating integrated professionals: Theory and practice on preparation for the professoriate. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 113 (pp. 69–81). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Baillie, C., Goodhew, P., and Skryabina, E. (2006). Threshold concepts in engineering education: Exploring potential blocks in student understanding. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(5), 955–962.

Bassok, M., and Novick, L.R. (2012). Problem solving. In K.J. Holyoak and R.G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 413–432). New York: Oxford University Press.

Beach, A.L., and Cox, M.D. (2009). The impact of faculty learning communities on teaching and learning. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1), 7–27.

Beichner, R.J. (2008). The SCALE-UP Project: A student-centered active learning environment for undergraduate programs. Paper presented at the National Research Council’s Workshop on Linking Evidence to Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education. Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080106.

Beichner, R., Saul, J.M., Abbott, D.S., Morse, J., Deardorff, D., Allain, R.J., Bonham, S.W., Dancy, M., and Risley, J. (2007, March). The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project. In E.F. Redish and P.J. Cooney (Eds.), Research-based reform of university physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.

Benbow, R., Byrd, D., and Connolly, M.R. (2011). The Wisconsin longitudinal study of doctoral and postdoctoral teaching development: Key findings. Available: http://www.cirtl.net/node/7300.

Bhattacharyya, G., and Bodner, G.M. (2005). It gets me to the product: How students propose organic mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(9), 1402–1407.

Braxton, J., Lucky, W., and Holland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 29, no. 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/John Wiley & Sons.

Brewe, E., Kramer, L., and O’Brien, G. (2009). Modeling Instruction: Positive attitudinal shifts in introductory physics measured with CLASS. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 5(1), 013102-1–013102-5.

Brewe, E., Sawtelle, V., Kramer, L.H., O’Brien, G.E., Rodriguez, I., and Pamelá, P. (2010). Toward equity through participation in Modeling Instruction in introductory university physics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 6, 010106-1–010106-12.

Brewe, E., Traxler, A., de la Garza, J., and Kramer, L.H. (2013). Extending positive CLASS results across multiple instructors and multiple classes of Modeling Instruction. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020116.

Brown, A.L., and Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practices (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brownell, S., and Tanner, K. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 339–346.

Carberry, A.R., and McKenna, A.F. (2014). Exploring student conceptions of modeling and modeling uses in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 77–91.

Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative. (2009). Learning goals for UBC PHYS 250, Introduction to Modern Physics. Available: http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/learn_goals.htm.

Catley, K.M., and Novick, L.R. (2008). Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks. BioScience, 58, 976–987.

Catley, K.M., and Novick, L.R. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students’ knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 311–332.

Center for Scientific Teaching. (2014). Mission statement. Available: http://cst.yale.edu/what-we-do.

Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning. (n.d.a). Core ideas. Available: http://www.cirtl.net/files/CIRTL_CoreIdeas.pdf.

Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning. (n.d.b). CIRTL network. Available: http://www.cirtl.net.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Cervato, C., and Frodeman, R. (2012). The significance of geologic time: Cultural, educational, and economic frameworks. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486, 19–27.

Chasteen, S.V., Perkins, K.K., Beale, P.D., Pollock, S.J., and Wieman, C.E. (2011). A thoughtful approach to instruction: Course transformation for the rest of us. Journal of College Science Teaching (40)4, 70-76.

Chasteen, S.V., Pepper, R.E., Pollock, S.J., and Perkins, K.K. (2012). But does it last?: Sustaining a research-based curriculum in upper-division electricity and magnetism. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, 1413, 139–142. Omaha, NE, August 3–4, 2011. Available: http://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=10321.

Cheek, K.A. (2010). A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 122–134.

Chen, X., and Ray, R. (n.d.). The story about DNA—Pursuing the big questions in molecular biology. Available: http://biology.wisc.edu/documents/xuchentu.pdf.

Clary, R.M., and Wandersee, J.H. (2007). A mixed methods analysis of the effects of an integrative geobiological study of petrified wood in introductory college geology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1011–1035.

Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.

Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417–452). New York: Routledge.

Cooper, J.L., MacGregor, J., Smith, K.A., and Robinson, P. (2000). Implementing small-group instruction: Insights from successful practitioners. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 63–76.

Cooper, M., and Klymkowsky, M. (2013). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1116–1122.

Cooper, M.M., Cox, Jr., C.T., Nammouz, M., Case, E., and Stevens, R.J. (2008). An assessment of the effect of collaborative groups on students’ problem-solving strategies and abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 866–872.

Cooper, M.M., Grove, N., Underwood, S.M., and Klymkowsky, M.W. (2010). Lost in Lewis structures: An investigation of student difficulties in developing representational competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(8), 869–874.

Cooper, M.M., Underwood, S.M., Hilley, C.Z., and Klymkowsky, M.W. (2012). Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1351–1357.

Cross, K.P., and Angelo, T.A. (1988). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for faculty. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

Crouch, C.H., and Mazur, E. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977.

Cummings, K. (2008). The Rensselaer studio model for learning and teaching: What have we learned? Paper presented at the National Research Council’s Workshop on Linking Evidence to Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080106.

Dancy, M., and Henderson, C. (2012). Educational transformation in STEM: Why has it been limited and how can it be accelerated? Presentation at the Second Conference on Transforming Research in Undergraduate STEM Education (TRUSE), St. Paul, MN, June 7, 2012. Available: http://www.chem.purdue.edu/towns/TRUSE/TRUSE%20docs/TRUSE%20Talks%202012/Dancy%20Truse%20Talk%20.pdf.

D’Avanzo, C., Anderson, A., Griffith, A., Merrill, J. (n.d.). Thinking like a biologist. Available: http://biodqc.org/node/35.

de Jong, T., and Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 279–288.

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Dickinson College. (2004). Workshop physics overview. Available: http://physics.dickinson.edu/~wp_web/wp_overview.html.

Dirks, C. (2011). The current status and future direction of biology education research. Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Docktor, J.L., and Mestre, J.P. (2011). “A synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics.” Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Dodick, J. (2012). Supporting students’ cognitive understanding of geological time: A needed “revolution” in science education. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486, 31–33.

Dori, Y.J., and Belcher, J. (2005). How does Technology-Enabled Active Learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.

Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., and Allen, D.E. (Eds.). (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Dutrow, B.L. (2007). Visual communication: Do you see what I see? Elements, 3, 119–126.

Ebert-May, D., Batzli, J., and Lim, H. (2003). Disciplinary research strategies for assessment of learning. Bioscience, 53(12), 1221–1228.

Ebert-May, D., Derting, T.L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J.L., Long, T.M., and Jardeleza, S.E. (2011). What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Bioscience, 61(7), 550–558.

Englebrecht, A.C., Mintzes, J.J., Brown, L.M., and Kelso, P.R. (2005). Probing understanding in physical geology using concept maps and clinical interviews. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 263–270.

Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Fairweather, J. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 401–422.

Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: A status report. Paper prepared for the National Research Council Board on Science Education Workshop on Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080106.

Felder, R.M., and Brent, R. (2010). The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of impact and implications for faculty development. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 121–134.

Flinn Scientific, Inc. (2014). POGIL Activities for AP* Biology. Batavia, IL: Flinn Scientific, Inc. [Permission to reprint copyrighted materials is gratefully acknowledged. Reproduced for one-time use with permission from Flinn Scientific, Inc. All rights reserved.]

Forestell, A., Brissenden, G., Prather, E.E., and Slater, T. (2008). Revisiting Think-Pair-Share: An expanded how-to guide. Center for Astronomy Education. Available: http://astronomy101.jpl.nasa.gov/teachingstrategies/teachingdetails/?StrategyID=23.

Formica, S.P., Easley, J.L., and Spraker, M.C. (2010). Transforming common-sense beliefs into Newtonian thinking through Just-in-Time Teaching. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020106-1–020106-7.

Freeman, S., and Parks, J.W. (2010). How accurate is peer grading? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 482–488.

Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J.W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., and Wenderoth, M.P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6, 132–139.

Freeman, S., Haak, D., and Wenderoth, M.P. (2011). Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 175–186.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Gabel, D., and Bunce, D. (1994). Research on problem solving: Chemistry. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–326). New York: Macmillan.

Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V., and Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.

Gaffney, J.D.H., Richards, E., Kustusch, M.B., Ding, L., and Beichner, R.J. (2008). Scaling up education reform. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(5), 48–53.

Gappa, J.M., Austin, A.E., and Trice, A.G. (2007). Rethinking faculty work: Higher education’s strategic imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gillian-Daniel, D. (2008). The impact of future faculty professional development in teaching STEM undergraduate education: A case study about the Delta Program in research, teaching, and learning at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. White paper for the National Academies Workshop on Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, October 13–14, 2008.

Gosser, D. (2011). The PLTL boost: A critical review of research. Progressions, 14(1), 3–12. Available: http://www.pltl.org.

Haak, D.C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., and Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 333, 1213–1216.

Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Halloun, I.A., and Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043–1055.

Halloun, I.A., and Hestenes, D. (1987). Modeling instruction in mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 455–462.

Hancock, G. (2010). Think-Pair-Share lecture. Presentation at the Early Career Geoscience Faculty Workshop Williamsburg, VA. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/details/files/19471.html.

Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S.M., and Wood, W.B. (2004, April 23). Scientific teaching. Science (304), 5670.

Hativa, N. (1995). The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: A qualitative evaluation. Research in Higher Education, 36(4), 377–413.

Hegarty, M. (2011). The role of spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. Paper presented at the Third Committee Meeting on Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Irvine, CA, December 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., and Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 209–249.

Hegarty, M., Stieff, M., and Dixon, B.L. (2013). Cognitive change in mental models with experience in the domain of organic chemistry. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 220–228.

Heller, K., and Heller, P. (2010). Cooperative problem solving in physics: A user’s manual. Available: http://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/Coop-Problem-Solving-Guide.pdf.

Henderson, C. (2008). Promoting instructional change in new faculty: An evaluation of the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 179–187.

Henderson, C., and Dancy, M. (2011). Increasing the impact and diffusion of STEM education innovations. White paper commissioned for the forum on Characterizing the Impact and Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations, Washington, DC, February 7–8, 2011.

Henderson, C., Beach, A., and Finkelstein, N.D. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.

Henderson, C., Dancy, M., and Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Physics Education Research, 8(020104), 1–14.

Heron, P.L, and McDermott, L.C. (1998). Bridging the gap between teaching and learning in geometrical optics. Optics and Photonics News, 9(9), 30–36.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55, 440–454.

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–151.

Hilborn, R.C. (2012). Meeting overview. The role of scientific societies in STEM faculty workshops. Washington, DC: Council of Scientific Society Presidents.

Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2011, May 3). HHMI helps summer institute expand to regional sites. HHMI News. Available: http://www.hhmi.org/news/hhmi-helps-summer-institute-expandregional-sites.

Hurley, S.M., and Novick, L.R. (2010). Solving problems using matrix, network, and hierarchy diagrams: The consequences of violating construction conventions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 275–290.

Jacobson, D., Davis, J., Licklider, B. (1998). Ten myths of cooperative learning in engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. November 1998, Tempe, AZ.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Reports on Higher Education No. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith K.A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30, 26–35.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson. R.T., and Smith, K.A. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 15–30.

Johnstone, A.H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn?: Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83.

Kali, Y., and Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369–391.

Karpicke, J.D., Butler, A.C., and Roediger, H.L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479.

Kellman, P.J. (2000). An update on Gestalt psychology. In B. Landau, J. Sabini, J. Jonides, and E. Newport (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and language: Essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kindfield, A.C.H. (1993/1994). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 1–36.

Klymkowsky, M., and Cooper, M. (n.d.). Omnis cellula e cellula: Knowledge statements and performance expectations. Available: http://virtuallaboratory.colorado.edu/Cell+Molecular.

Knight, J.K., and Wood, W.B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310.

Kortz, K.M., and Smay, J.J. (2012). Lecture tutorials for introductory geoscience, 2nd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Kortz, K.M., Smay, J.J., and Murray, D.P. (2008). Increasing learning in introductory geoscience courses using lecture tutorials. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(3), 280–290.

Kozma, R.B., and Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.

Kraft, K. (2012). Encouraging students to “think” about how they think. In the Trenches, 2(1), 6–8.

Kraft, K. (n.d.). Earthquake case study. On the Cutting Edge: Professional development for geoscience faculty. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/intro/activities/23588.html.

Krause, S.J., Kelly, J.E., and Baker, D.R. (2012a). Just-in-Time Teaching with Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (JiTTIFFF or JTF) for cyber learning in core materials courses. Presentation prepared for the American Society of Engineering Education annual conference, 2012. San Antonio, TX, June 2012.

Krause, S.J., Kelly, J.E., and Baker, D.R. (2012b). Strategies and tools for engaging and assessing students with cyber learning by Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (CLIFF) in core materials classes. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2012.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Krause, S.J., Baker, D.R., Carberry, A.R., Koretsky, M., Brooks, B.J., Gilbuena, D., Waters, C., and Ankeny, C.J. (2013). Just-in-Time Teaching with Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (JiTTIFFF or JTF) for cyber learning in core materials courses. Paper prepared for the American Society of Engineering Education annual conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23–26, 2013. Available: http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/7863/download.

Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P., and Simon, H.A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4(4), 317–345.

Lattuca, L.R., Terenzini, P.T., and Volkwein, J.F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000: Executive summary. Available: http://www.abet.org/engineering-change.

Lazry, N., Mazur, E., and Watkins, J. (2008, November). Peer Instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1066–1069.

Leckie, M. (n.d.). Teaching large introductory geoscience classes. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/intro/largeclasses_leckie.html.

Lewis, S.E., and Lewis, J.E. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 135–139.

Libarkin, J.C., Kurdziel, J.P., and Anderson, S.W. (2007). College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(5), 413–422.

Long, T.M., Dauer, J.R., Kostelnik, K.M., Momsen, J.L., Wyse, S.A., Speth, E.B., and Ebert-May, D. (2014). Fostering ecoliteracy through model-based instruction. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(2), 138–139.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., and Stiles, K.E. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Luo, W. (2008). Just-in-Time Teaching (JITT) improves students’ performance in classes: Adaptation of JITT in four geography courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(2), 166–171.

Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. In A.S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest. College Park, MD: University of Maryland College of Education.

Macdonald, R.H., Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W., and Tewksbury, B.J. (2005). Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of US Faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237.

Manduca, C.A. (2008). Working with the discipline—Developing a supportive environment for education. Paper commissioned for the National Research Council’s Workshop on Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Washington, DC. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080106.

Manduca, C.A. (2011). Improving undergraduate geoscience education—A community endeavor., GSA Today, 21(9), 12–14.

Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.A., Tewksbury, B., Macdonald, R.H., Fox, S.P., Iverson, E.R., Kirk, K., McDaris, J., Ormand, C., and Bruckner, M. (2010). SPORE: Science Prize for Online Resources in Education: On the Cutting Edge: Teaching help for geoscience faculty. Science, 327(5969), 1095–1096.

Marrs, K.A., and Novak, G. (2004). Just-in-Time Teaching in biology: Creating an active learner classroom using the Internet. Cell Biology Education, 3(1), 049–061.

Massey, W.F., Wilger, A.K., and Colbeck, C. (1994). Overcoming “hallowed” collegiality. Change, 26, 11–20.

Mayer, R.E., and Wittrock, M. (2006). Problem solving. In P.A. Alexander and P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 287–303). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mazzella, D. (2013). A year of women in STEM: Michelle Withers. West Virginia University Magazine. Available: http://wvumag.wvu.edu/a-year-of-women-in-stem/michelle-withers.

McConnell, D., and Steer, D. (2014). The good Earth: Introduction to earth science, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McConnell, D., and Steer, D. (n.d.). ConcepTest: Determining numbers of plates. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/conceptests/examples/numbers.html.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

McConnell, D.A., and van der Hoeven Kraft, K.J. (2011). Affective domain and student learning in the Geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 106–110.

McConnell, D., Steer, D.N., Owens, K.D., Knott, J.R., Van Horn, S., Borowski, W., Dick, J., et al. (2006). Using ConcepTests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(1), 61-68.

McDermott, L.C., and Shaffer, P.S. (2002). Tutorials in introductory physics, 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McLaughlin, J., Iverson, E., Kirkendall, R., Bruckner, M., and Manduca, C.A. (2010). Evaluation report of On the Cutting Edge. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/files/NAGTWorkshops/2009_cutting_edge_evaluation_1265409435.pdf.

Mestre, J.P. (2008). Learning goals in undergraduate STEM education and evidence for achieving them. Commissioned paper for the National Research Council Workshop on Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education, Washington, DC, June 30, 2008.

Michigan State University. (2011, December 12). MSU program trains researchers in the finer points of teaching. MSU Today. Available: http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2011/msu-program-trainsresearchers-the-finer-points-of-teaching/#sthash.gsvENcDF.IXNL7RmO.dpuf.

Minnesota State University, Mankato. (2013). Iron Range engineering. Available: http://cset.mnsu.edu/ie.

Moog, R.S., Creegan, F.J., Hanson, D.M., Spencer, J.N., and Straumanis, A.R. (2006). Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: POGIL and The POGIL Project. Metropolitan Universities, 17(4), 41–52.

Moretto, K. (2011). Assessment of the impact of the Lilly Teaching Fellowship: Summary 1991–2004, 2004–2009 cohorts. Available: http://fod.msu.edu/sites/default/files/3%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Impact%20of%20the%20Lilly%20Teaching%20Fellowship-%20Summary%2019912004%202004-09%20Cohorts.pdf.

Nachshon, I. (1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Behavioral Neuroscience, 25, 161–174.

Nakhleh, M.B., and Mitchell, R.C. (1993). Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 190–192.

National Academies. (n.d.). Summer institutes. Available: http://www.academiessummerinstitute.org.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority representation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy and Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. M.S. Donovan, J.D. Bransford, and J.W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.), Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

National Research Council. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. M.A. Fox and N. Hackerman (Eds.), Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, Rewarding, and Developing Excellence in Teaching of Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, and A.W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade, Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2011). Promising practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Summary of two workshops. N. Nielsen, Rapporteur. Planning Committee on Evidence on Selected Innovations in Undergraduate STEM Education. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. S.R. Singer, N.R. Nielsen, and H.A. Schweingruber (Eds.), Committee on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Board on Science Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Novak, G.M. (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending active learning with Web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Novick, L.R., and Catley, K.M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 197–223.

Novick, L.R., Catley, K.M., and Funk, D.J. (2010). Characters are key: The effect of synapomorphies on cladogram comprehension. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 539–547.

Novick, L.R., Stull, A.T., and Catley, K.M. (2012). Reading phylogenetic trees: Effects of tree orientation and text processing on comprehension. BioScience, 62, 757–764.

Pelaez, N.J., Boyd, D.D., Rojas, J.B., and Hoover, M.A. (2005). Prevalence of blood circulation misconceptions among prospective elementary teachers. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3), 172–181.

Pfund, C., Miller, S., Brenner, K., Bruns, P., Chang, A., Ebert-May, D., Fagen, A.P., Gentile, J., Gossens, S., Khan, I.M., Labov, J.B., Pribbenow, C.M., Susman, M., Tong, L., Wright, R., Yuan, R.T., Wood, W.B., and Handelsman, J. (2009). Summer institute to improve university science teaching. Science, 324, 470–471.

Pfund, C., Mathieu, R., Austin, A., Connolly, M., Manske, B., and Moore, K. (2012, November/December). Advancing STEM undergraduate learning: Preparing the nation’s future faculty. Change, 64–72.

Piburn, M., Kraft, K., and Pacheco, H. (2011). A new century for geoscience education research. Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Pollock, S., Pepper, R., Chasteen, S., and Perkins, K. (2011). Multiple roles of assessment in upper-division physics course reforms. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 307–310.

Porter, L., Bailey-Lee, C., and Simon, B. (2013). Halving fail rates using Peer Instruction: A study of four computer science courses. Paper prepared for the SIGCSE 2013 conference, Denver, CO, March 6–9, 2013.

Prather, E. (2010). When students are not learning, are you really teaching? Center for Astronomy Education. Available: http://cetalweb.utep.edu/docs/Prather_Aug%202010_UTEP_Implementation%20of%20Interactive%20Teaching.pdf.

Prather, E.E., and Brissenden, G. (2008). Development and application of a situated apprenticeship approach to professional development of astronomy instructors. Astronomy Education Review, 7(2), 1-17.

Prather, E.E., Slater, T.F., Adams, J., and Brissenden, B. (2007). Lecture-tutorials for introductory astronomy, 2nd ed. New York: Prentice Hall.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.

Price, E., Tsui, S., Hart, A., and Saucedo, L. (2011). Don’t erase that whiteboard!: Archiving student work on a photo-sharing website. The Physics Teacher, 49, 426.

Price, E., Goldberg, F., Robinson, S.J., Harlow, D., McKean, M., Keene, S., and Czarnocki, K. (2013a). Development and evaluation of a large-enrollment, active-learning physics curriculum. Physics Education Research Conference series, 285–288. Available: http://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=13183.

Price, E., Goldberg, F., Patterson, S., and Heft, P. (2013b). Supporting scientific writing and evaluation in a conceptual physics course with calibrated peer review. 2012 Physics Education Research Conference: AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 318–321.

Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. (2014a). What is POGIL? Available: https://pogil.org/about.

Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (2014b). Sample HSPl activities. Enzymes and cellular regulation. Available: https://pogil.org/high-school/hspi/activities/sample-activities.

Rebich, S., and Gautier, C. (2005). Concept mapping to reveal prior knowledge and conceptual change in a mock summit course on global climate change. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 355–365.

Rice, R.E., Sorcinelli, M.D., and Austin, A.E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.

Richardson, C.T., and O’Shea, B.W. (2013). Assessing gender differences in response system questions for an introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 81, 231.

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.

Rosengrant, D., Etkina, E., and Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). An overview of recent research on multiple representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883, 149–152.

Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M.M., and Stevens, R.H. (2011). Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 323–340.

Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M., Gatlin, T., and Bhattacharyya, G. (2011). Students’ experience in a general chemistry cooperative problem-based laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 434–442.

Schuster, J.H., and Finkelstein, M.J. (2006). The American faculty: The restructuring of academic work and careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Schwartz, D., and Bransford, J.D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475–522.

Schwartz, D.L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., and Bransford, J.D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In C.M. Reigelut (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, volume II (pp. 183–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Science Education Resource Center. (2013). How to teach with Google Earth. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/google_earth/how.html.

Science Education Resource Center. (n.d.). ConcepTest examples. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/interactive/ctestexm.html.

Seidel, S.B., and Tanner, K. D. (2013). “What if students revolt?”—Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12, 586–595.

Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Silverthorn, D.U. (2006). Teaching and learning in the interactive classroom. American Journal of Physiology—Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 135–140.

Simon, B., and Taylor, J. (2009). What is the value of course-specific learning goals? Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(2), 53–57.

Smith, K.A. (1998). Grading cooperative projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 59–67.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

Smith, K.A. (2000). Going deeper: Formal small-group learning in large classes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 25–46.

Smith, K.A. (2011). Cooperative learning: Lessons and insights from thirty years of championing a research-based innovative practice. Paper prepared for the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD, October 12–15, 2011.

Smith, K.A., and MacGregor, J. (2000). Making small-group learning and learning communities a widespread reality. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 77–88.

Smith, M.K., and Perkins, K.K. (2010, March). “At the end of my course, students should be able to …”: The benefits of creating and using effective learning goals. Molecular Biology Australia, 35–37.

Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.K., Guild, N., and Su, T.T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124.

Smith, M.U. (1992). Expertise and the organization of knowledge: Unexpected differences among genetic counselors, faculty, and students on problem categorization tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 179–205.

Sokoloff, D.R., and Thornton, R.K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher, 35(6), 340–347.

Sokoloff, D.R., and Thornton R.K. (2004). Interactive lecture demonstrations: Active learning in introductory physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sorby, S.A. (2009). Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459–480.

Sorcinelli, M.D., Austin, A.E., Eddy, P., and Beach, A. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker Press.

Sözbilir, M. (2004). What makes physical chemistry difficult?: Perceptions of Turkish chemistry undergraduates and lecturers. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(4), 573–578.

Streveler, R.A., Smith, K.A., and Pilotte, M. (2012). Aligning course content, assessment, and delivery: Creating a context for outcome-based education. In K.M. Yusof, N.A. Azli, A.N. Kosnin, S.K.S. Yusof, and Y.M. Yusof (Eds.), Outcome-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: Innovative practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Svinicki, M. (2011). Synthesis of the research on teaching and learning in engineering since the implementation of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000. Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Talanquer, V. (2012). Chemical thinking. Prezi presentation. Available: http://prezi.com/ds5j9zjqnf3x/c21.

Talanquer, V., and Pollard, J. (2010). Let’s teach how we think instead of what we know. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 43–47.

Talanquer, V., and Pollard, J. (2012). Chemical thinking. Pilot online textbook for General Chemistry I. Available: http://www.chem.arizona.edu/tpp/chemthink (Password: chem21).

Tewksbury, B.J., and Macdonald, R.H. (2007). A practical strategy for designing effective and innovative courses. In K. Karukstis and T. Elgren (Eds.), Developing and sustaining a research-supportive curriculum: A compendium of successful practices (pp. 127–136). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research. Available: http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/coursedesign/tutorial/index.html.

Titus, S., and Horsman, E. (2009). Characterizing and improving spatial visualization skills. Journal of Geoscience Education. 57(4), 242–254.

Towns, M., and Kraft, A. (2011). Review and synthesis of research in chemical education from 2000–2010. Paper presented at the Second Committee Meeting on the Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research, Washington, DC, October 2010. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080124.

Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P.U., and Heiser, J. (2000). Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng, and V. Haarslev (Eds.), Theory and Application of Diagrams (pp. 221–230). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

University of British Columbia. (n.d.). Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative: Tools. Available: http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/tools.htm.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×

University of Colorado Boulder. (2013). PhET interactive simulations. Available: http://phet.colorado.edu.

University of Georgia. (2007). Bylaws and peer evaluation form. Document provided by Michelle Momany, professor and head of the Department of Plant Biology at the University of Georgia.

van der Hoeven, Kraft, K.J., Srogi, L.A., Husman, J., Semken, S., and Fuhrman, M. (2011). Engaging students to learn through the affective domain: A new framework for teaching in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 71–84.

Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 891–897.

Vergara C.E., Campa, H., Cheruvelil, K., Ebert-May, D., Fata-Hartley, C., Johnston, K., and Urban-Lurain, M. (2013). FAST-Future Academic Scholars in Teaching: A high-engagement development program for future STEM faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 39(2), 93-107.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weinstein, C.E., Husman, J., and Dierking, D.R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In B. Monique, R.P. Paul, M. Zeidner, M. Boekaerts, and P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Wieman, C., and Perkins, K. (2005). Transforming physics education. Physics Today, 58(11), 36.

Wieman, C., Perkins, K., Gilbert, S., Benay, F., Kennedy, S., Semsar, K., Knight, J., Shi, J., Smith, M., Kelly, T., Taylor, J., Yurk, H., Birol, G., Langdon, L., Pentecost, T., Stewart, J., Arthurs, L., Bair, A., Stempien, J., Gilley, B., Jones, F., Kennedy, B., Chasteen, S., and Simon, B. (2008). Clicker resource guide: An instructor’s guide to the effective use of personal response systems (clickers) in teaching. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia. Available: http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/resources/clickers.htm.

Wieman, C., Perkins, K., and Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 6–14. Available: http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202010/transforming-science-full.html.

Wieman, C., Deslauriers, L., and Gilley, B. (2013). Use of research-based instructional strategies: How to avoid faculty quitting. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 9, 023102.

Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design, 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wilson, S.M. (2011, May). Effective STEM teacher preparation, instruction, and professional development. Paper presented at the workshop of the National Research Council’s Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K–12 STEM Education, Washington, DC, May 2011. Available: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_080128.

Wirth, K.R. (2003, November). Using an M&M® magma chamber to illustrate magmatic differentiation. In Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 34, 250.

Wirth, K.R. (n.d.). Using an M&M® magma chamber to illustrate magmatic differentiation: background and notes for instructors. Available: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/CourseMaterials.html.

Wirth, K.R., and Perkins, D. (2008). Learning to learn. Available: http://www.macalester.edu/academics/geology/wirth/learning.pdf.

Wlodkowski, R.J. (1999). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A guide to improving instruction and increasing learner achievement, revised edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., and Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

Yezierski, E.J., and Birk, J.P. (2006). Misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Using animations to close the gender gap. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(6), 954–960.

Yuretich, R.F. (2003). Encouraging critical thinking: Measuring skills in large introductory classes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(3), 40–45.

Yuretich, R.F., Khan, S.A., Leckie, R.M., and Clement, J.J. (2001). Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(2), 111–119.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 216
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 217
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 219
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 220
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 221
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 222
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 223
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 224
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2015. Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18687.
×
Page 225
Next: List of Interviewees »
Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $39.95 Buy Ebook | $31.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The undergraduate years are a turning point in producing scientifically literate citizens and future scientists and engineers. Evidence from research about how students learn science and engineering shows that teaching strategies that motivate and engage students will improve their learning. So how do students best learn science and engineering? Are there ways of thinking that hinder or help their learning process? Which teaching strategies are most effective in developing their knowledge and skills? And how can practitioners apply these strategies to their own courses or suggest new approaches within their departments or institutions? Reaching Students strives to answer these questions.

Reaching Students presents the best thinking to date on teaching and learning undergraduate science and engineering. Focusing on the disciplines of astronomy, biology, chemistry, engineering, geosciences, and physics, this book is an introduction to strategies to try in your classroom or institution. Concrete examples and case studies illustrate how experienced instructors and leaders have applied evidence-based approaches to address student needs, encouraged the use of effective techniques within a department or an institution, and addressed the challenges that arose along the way.

The research-based strategies in Reaching Students can be adopted or adapted by instructors and leaders in all types of public or private higher education institutions. They are designed to work in introductory and upper-level courses, small and large classes, lectures and labs, and courses for majors and non-majors. And these approaches are feasible for practitioners of all experience levels who are open to incorporating ideas from research and reflecting on their teaching practices. This book is an essential resource for enriching instruction and better educating students.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!