National Academies Press: OpenBook

Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative (2020)

Chapter: Appendix G: Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee's Public Meetings

« Previous: Appendix F: Survey of Administrators of Sponsored Research
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee's Public Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×

Appendix G

Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee’s Public Meetings
1

Eli Berman, University of California, San Diego

Kathleen Carley, Carnegie Mellon University

David Chu, Institute for Defense Analyses

Matthew Clark, Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security

Hasan Davulcu, Arizona State University

Michael Desch, University of Notre Dame

Thomas Fingar, Stanford University

Erin Fitzgerald, University of Maryland

James Goldgeier, Council on Foreign Relations

Gerald (Jay) Goodwin, Foundational Science Research Unit, U.S. Army Research Institute

Christina Hegadorn, United States Institute of Peace

David Honey, Office of the Director of National Intelligence

Benjamin Knott, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Department of Defense

Gary Kollmorgen, GSK Inc.

Natalie Konopinski, American Anthropological Association

Martin Kruger, Office of Naval Research, Department of Defense

Thomas Mahnken, Center of Strategic and Budgetary Assessments

Laura McNamara, Sandia National Laboratories (via webconferencing)

Thomas McNaugher, Georgetown University

___________________

1 Public meetings were held on January 16, April 12, July 19, and October 2, 2018.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee's Public Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×

David Montgomery, Department of Defense

Bindu Nair, Department of Defense

Steve Newell, American Psychological Association

Kaleb Redden, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Department of Defense

Steven Riskin, United States Institute of Peace

Adam Russell, Defense Sciences Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Betsy Super, American Political Science Association

Alan Tomkins, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, National Science Foundation

Lisa Troyer, Army Research Office, Department of Defense

James Walsh, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee's Public Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"Appendix G: Individuals Who Provided Input during the Committee's Public Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25482.
×
Page 146
Next: Appendix H: Output Categories and Coding Notes »
Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $55.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Minerva Research Initiative is a Department of Defense (DoD) social science grant program that funds unclassified basic research relevant to national security. The goal of the program is to make use of the intellectual capital of university-based social scientists to inform understanding of issues important to DoD and the broader national security community. Evaluation of the Minerva Research Initiative discusses the program's successes and challenges over its first decade of operation, and highlights ways to strengthen the program’s foundations and take advantage of opportunities for broadening its reach and usefulness.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!