Relationships Between the Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Binders and the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Mixtures (2022)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

83   References Ahearn, W. Where’s My Pavement Today? Presented at the FHWA Binder ETG Meeting, Fall River, MA, April 2015. Anderson, R. M., G. N. King, D. I. Hanson, and P. B. Blankenship. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–664. Andrei, D., M. W. Witczak, and W. Mirza. Development of a Revised Predictive Model for the Dynamic (Complex) Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures. NCHRP 1-37A Inter Team Technical Report, College Park, University of Maryland, March 1999. ARA Inc., ERES Division. Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Appendix II-1: Calibration of Fatigue Models for Flexible Pavements, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. Bahia, H., D. Hanson, M. Zeng, H. Zhai, M. Khatri, and R. Anderson. NCHRP Report 459: Characterization of Modified Asphalt Binders in Superpave Mix Design, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. Bennert, T. Asphalt Binder and Mixture Properties Produced with REOB Modified Asphalt Binders. Presented at the FHWA Binder ETG Meeting, Fall River, MA, April 2015. Bonaquist, R., J. J. Adams, and D. A. Anderson. NCHRP Research Report 967: Asphalt Binder Aging Methods to Accurately Reflect Mixture Aging. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2021. Bonnaure, F., A. Gravois, and J. Udron. A New Method for Predicting the Fatigue Life of Asphalt Mixes. Proceedings, the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 49, 1980, pp. 499–524. Christensen, D. W., and D. A. Anderson. Interpretation of Dynamic Mechanical Test Data for Paving Grade Asphalt Cements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 61, 1992, pp. 66–116. Christensen, D. W., and R. Bonaquist. Improved Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Special Issue: Papers from the 90th Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists’ Annual Meeting, Vol. 16, Supplement 2, 2015, pp. 254–274. Christensen, D. W., T. Pellinen, and R. F. Bonaquist. Hirsch Model for Estimating the Modulus of Asphalt Concrete. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72, 2003, pp. 97–121. Corrigan, M. REOB: ETG Status and Emerging Knowledge. Presented at the North Central Asphalt User Producer Group Meeting, West Lafayette, IN, March 2016. Dahlquist, C. A. An Investigation into the Nature of Tack. Adhesives Age, Vol. 2, No. 25, 1959. Deacon, J., J. Harvey, A. Tayebali, and C. Monismith. Influence of Binder Loss Modulus on the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 66, 1997. Farrar, M. J., P. M. Harnsberger, K. P. Thomas, and W. Wiser. Evaluation of Oxidation in Asphalt Pavement Test Sections after Four Years of Service. Submitted for the International Conference on Perpetual Pavement, September 2016. Gibson, N., X. Qi, A. Shenoy, G. Al-Khateeb, M. E. Kutay, A. Andriescu, K. Stuart, J. Youtcheff, and T. Harman. Performance Testing for Superpave and Structural Validation. Final Report FHWA-HRT-11-045. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012. Glover, C. J., R. R. Davison, C. H. Domke, Y. Ruan, P. Juristyarini, D. B. Knorr, and S. H. Jung. Development of a New Method for Assessing Asphalt Binder Durability with Field Validation. Report 0-1872-2. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 2005. Grillet, A. M., N. B. Wyatt, and L. M. Gloe. Polymer Gel Rheology and Adhesion. Albuquerque, N.M.: Sandia National Laboratories, USA, 2012. Harvey, J. T. “SHRP A-003A Asphalt Concrete Specimen Preparation Protocol, Version 3.0,” Technical Memo- randum No. TM-UCB-A-003A-91-2, prepared for SHRP, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.

84 Relationships Between the Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Binders and the Fatigue Performance of Asphalt Mixtures Heukelom, W. Observations on the Rheology and Fracture of Bitumens and Asphalt Mixes. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 35, 1966, pp. 358–399. Huang, Y. H. Pavement Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1993. Kanabar, A. Physical and Chemical Aging Behavior of Asphalt Cements from Two Northern Ontario Pavement Trials. Kingston, ON: Queens University, Department of Chemistry, 2010. Kandhal, P. S. Low-Temperature Ductility in Relation to Pavement Performance. In Low-Temperature Properties of Bituminous Material and Compacted Bituminous Paving Mixtures: ASTM STP 628 (C. R. Marek, ed.), ASTM, 1977, pp. 95–106. Levenburg, E. ELLEA: Microsoft Excel Layered Elastic Analysis Spreadsheet. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2016. Marks, P. Ontario’s Quest for Improved Asphalt Cement Specifications. Presented at the FHWA Binder ETG Meeting, Fall River, MA, April 2015. Miller, J. S., and W. Y. Bellinger. Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, Report FHWA-RD-03-031. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 2003. Monismith, C. L., J. A. Epps, D. A. Kasianchuk, and D. B. McLean. Asphalt Mixture Behaviour in Repeated Flexure, Report No. TE 70-5. University of California, Berkeley, January 1972. Pascal, J. P., M. Elwardany, D. W. Christensen, G. King, and C. Rodezno. NCHRP 9-60 Update. Presented to the NCHRP 9-60 Panel, January 30, 2019. Pellinen, T. K. Investigation of the Use of Dynamic Modulus as an Indicator of Hot-Mix Asphalt Performance. PhD dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe, May 2001. Reinke, G., A. Hanz, D. Herlitzka, S. Engber, and W. Ryan. Further Investigations into the Impact of REOB and Paraffinic Oils on the Performance of Bituminous Mixtures. Presented at the FHWA Binder ETG Meeting, Fall River, MA, April 2015. Rowe, G., Written discussion to “Evaluation of the Relationship between Asphalt Binder Properties and Non-Load Related Cracking,” R. M. Anderson et al., Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 80, 2011, pp. 615–664. Shook, J. F., F. N. Finn, M. W. Witczak, and C. L. Monismith. Thickness Design of Asphalt Pavements—The Asphalt Institute Method. Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 1, University of Michigan and Delft University of Technology, August 1982. Stuart, K. D., W. Mogawer, and P. Romero. Validation of the Superpave Asphalt Binder Fatigue Cracking Parameter Using an Accelerated Loading Facility, Final Report FHWA-RD-01-093. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 2002. Tse, M. F. Application of Adhesion Model for Developing Hot Melt Adhesives Bonded to Polyolefin Surfaces. Journal of Adhesion, Vol. 48, Issue 1-4, 1995, pp. 149–167. University of California, Berkeley, Asphalt Research Program, Institute of Transportation Studies. SHRP-A-404: Fatigue Response of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixes. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 1994. Witczak, M., M. Mamlouk, M. Souliman, and W. Zeiada. NCHRP Report 762: Laboratory Validation of an Endurance Limit for Asphalt Pavements. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013.