National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES PORTFOLIOS

Authored by John H. Cable and Jocelyn S. Davis in conjunction with the Federal Facilities Council Ad Hoc

Committee on Performance Indicators for Federal Real Property Asset Management

Federal Facilities Council Technical Report #147

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

NOTICE

The Federal Facilities Council (FFC) is a continuing activity of the Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment of the National Research Council (NRC). The purpose of the FFC is to promote continuing cooperation among the sponsoring Federal agencies and between the agencies and other elements of the building community in order to advance building science and technology—particularly with regard to the design, construction, acquisition, evaluation, and operation of Federal facilities. The sponsor agencies are the:

Architect of the Capitol

Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service

Department of the Air Force, Air National Guard

Department of the Air Force, Office of the Civil Engineer

Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers

Department of the Army, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management

Department of Commerce, Office of Real Estate

Department of Defense, Defense Facilities Directorate

Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration

Department of Energy, Office of Engineering and Construction Management

Department of Energy, Office of Science

Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service

Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health

Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection

Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Administration

Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Coast Guard

Department of the Interior, Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety

Department of Justice, Facilities and Administrative Services

Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Department of State, Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations

Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Facilities Management

Environmental Protection Agency

General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Facilities Engineering and Real Property Division

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory

National Science Foundation

Smithsonian Institution, Facilities Engineering and Operations

U.S. Postal Service, Engineering Division

As part of its activities, the FFC periodically publishes reports that have been prepared by committees of government employees. Because these committees are not appointed by the NRC, they do not make recommendations, and their reports are considered FFC publications rather than NRC publications.

For additional information on the FFC program and its reports, visit the Web site at www.nationalacademies.org/ffc; write to Director, Federal Facilities Council, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Room 944, Washington, DC 20001; or call 202-334-3374.

Printed in the United States of America 2004

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

FEDERAL FACILITIES COUNCIL AD HOC COMMITTEE ON PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR FEDERAL REAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT

COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS

Eduard Dailide, P.E.,

Office of Engineering and Construction Management, Department of Energy

Eugene Hubbard, P.E.,

Facilities Engineering and Real Property Division, NASA

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Patrick Barry, P.E.,

Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture

Robert Carlsen,

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy

Anthony Clifford,

Division of Engineering Services, National Institutes of Health

Joseph Corliss,

Division of Facilities Planning and Construction, Indian Health Service

James Curtis,

Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations, Department of State

James Dempsey, P.E.,

Shore Facilities Capital Asset Management, U.S. Coast Guard

Clair Gill,

Facilities Engineering and Operations, Smithsonian Institution

Michael Greenan,

Office of Enterprise Asset Management, Department of Veterans Affairs

David Hammond,

Shore Facilities Capital Asset Management, U.S. Coast Guard

Jay Janke,

Office of Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense

Michael Kastle, P.E.,

Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety, Department of the Interior

Barbara Nichols,

Facilities and Administrative Services, Department of Justice

Scott Robinson, P.E.,

Facilities Engineering and Real Property Division, NASA

Dennis Sheils,

Office of Facilities Management, Department of Veterans Affairs

Harry Singh,

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy

Edmund Tupay, P.E.,

Office of Real Property Asset Management, Department of Homeland Security

Louis Welker, P.E.,

Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture

Tracy Wilson,

Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Ray Wynter,

Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration

FEDERAL FACILITIES COUNCIL STAFF

Lynda Stanley, Director

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

FEDERAL FACILITIES COUNCIL

Lt. Gen. Henry J. Hatch, P.E.,

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Retired), Chair

William W. Brubaker,

Facilities Engineering and Operations, Smithsonian Institution, Vice Chair

Patrick Barry, P.E.,

Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture

Tony Clifford,

Division of Engineering Services, National Institutes of Health

Will Colston,

Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations, Department of State

Captain José Cuzme, P.E.,

Division of Facilities Planning and Construction, Indian Health Service

Jesus de la Garza, Ph.D.,

Directorate for Engineering, National Science Foundation

David Eakin, P.E.,

Office of the Chief Architect, Public Buildings Service, General Services Administration

Ramon Garcia,

Facilities Engineering Division, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security

James Hill, Ph.D.,

Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Eugene Hubbard, P.E.,

Facilities Engineering and Real Property Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Michael Kastle, P.E.,

Office of Managing Risk and Public Safety, U.S. Department of the Interior

Ben Lawless,

Facilities Division, Air National Guard Readiness Center

Raymond Lynn,

Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Capt. Jay Manik,

Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard

Robert L. Neary, Jr.,

Office of Facilities Management, Department of Veterans Affairs

John Nerger,

Facilities and Housing Directorate, Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management, U.S. Department of the Army

Ralph Newton,

Defense Facilities Directorate, Department of Defense

Dale Olson,

Office of the Civil Engineer, U.S. Air Force

Wade Raines,

Engineering Division, U.S. Postal Service

James Rispoli,

Office of Engineering and Construction Management, Department of Energy

Bruce Scott,

National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy

Stan Walker,

Shore Facilities Capital Asset Management, U.S. Coast Guard

Jim Woods,

Office of Real Estate, Department of Commerce

James Wright,

Chief Engineer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy

John Yates,

Office of Science, Department of Energy

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

Acronyms


ACI

Asset Condition Index

APPA

Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers (formerly Association of Physical Plant Administrators)

AUI

Asset Utilization Index


BCI

Building Condition Index

BMAR

Backlog of Maintenance and Repair


CRV

current replacement value


DoD

Department of Defense

DOE

Department of Energy

DM

Deferred Maintenance


EMS

Engineered Management System

ERDC-CERL

Engineering Research and Development Center-Construction Engineering Research Laboratory


FCI

Facilities Condition Index

FFC

Federal Facilities Council

FRR

Facilities Revitalization Rate

FSM

Facilities Sustainment Model


GAO

Government Accountability Office, formerly General Accounting Office

GPRA

Government Performance and Results Act of 1993

GSA

General Services Administration

GSF

gross square feet

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×

IRR

Installations Readiness Report


MDI

Mission Dependency Index


NASA

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NNSA

National Nuclear Security Administration

NRC

National Research Council


OMB

Office of Management and Budget


PMA

President’s Management Agenda

PRV

Plant Replacement Value


RR

Recapitalization Rate


SAM

Strategic Assessment Model

SR

Sustainment Rate

SUI

Space Utilization Index

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2005. Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11226.
×
Page R8
Next: Executive Summary »
Key Performance Indicators for Federal Facilities Portfolios: Federal Facilities Council Technical Report Number 147 Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

More than 30 federal departments and agencies with a wide range of missions and programs manage large inventories of facilities, also called portfolios. These portfolios range in size from a few hundred to more than a hundred thousand individual structures, buildings, and their supporting infrastructure. They are diverse in terms of facility types, mix of types, and geographic dispersal. For federal senior executives, facilities portfolio-related decisions revolve around the allocation of resources (staff, funding, time) for acquisition, renovation, operation, repair, and disposition of facilities. To make informed decisions, senior executives require information that will allow them to answer such questions as:

  • What facilities do we have?
  • What condition are they in?
  • What facilities are needed to support the organization’s missions?

This study lays out a framework for developing and evaluating trends in facilities portfolio conditions, investments, and costs and identifies a set of key indicators that can be used to track performance over time. Some of the indicators are currently in use in some federal agencies; others will need to be developed.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!