National Academies Press: OpenBook

Exoplanet Science Strategy (2018)

Chapter: Appendix D: Biosignature Table

« Previous: Appendix C: Exoplanet Detection Methods
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Biosignature Table." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Exoplanet Science Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25187.
×
Page 171
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Biosignature Table." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Exoplanet Science Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25187.
×
Page 172
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Biosignature Table." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Exoplanet Science Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25187.
×
Page 173

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

D Biosignature Table TABLE D.1 Biosignature Table: Spectral Features as a Function of Wavelength Range That Could Be Sought for Identification of an Oxygenic Photosynthetic Biosphere Molecules/ Feature 0.1-1.8 μm 1.8-2.5 μm 2.5-5.0 μm 5.0-20 μm Notes O2 0.14, 0.2, 0.69, — Biosignature sought—also 0.76, 1.27 disequilibrium pair with CH4, N2O. O3 0.2-0.3 (strong), 4.75 9.6 Biosignature sought—also 0.38-0.65 disequilibrium pair with CH4, N2O. O4 (O2-O2 0.45, 0.48, 0.53, — False positive indicator—dense O2 CIA)a 0.57, 0.63, from ocean runaway.b 1.06,1.27 (strong) CH4 0.1-0.14, 0.79, 2.31 (strong) 3.3 (strong) 7.7 Biosignature sought— 0.89, 1.0, 1.1, disequilibrium pair with O2. 1.4, 1.7 Indicates presence of O2 sink.c May be disequilibrium pair with CO2.d CO2 0.14, 1.05, 1.21, 2.01, 2.75 4.3 (strong) 9.4, 10.4, False positive indicator, especially 1.32, 1.44, 1.6 15 in combination with CO—ongoing CO2 photolysis.e CO 1.6 2.35 4.65 False positive indicator, especially in combination with CO2—ongoing CO2 photolysis.e N4 (N2-N2 4.1 False positive discriminant—helps CIA)f quantify noncondensible gas fraction, disequilibrium biosignature when paired with N2/O2.g N2O 0.13, 0.145, 2.11, 2.25 2.6, 2.67, 7.9, 17.0 Biosignature sought— 0.185 2.97, 3.6, 3.9, disequilibrium pair with O2. 4.3, 4.5 H2 0.64-0.66, 0.8- Possible bulk atmospheric 0.85 constituent. H2O 0.13, 0.17, 0.65, 1.85 2.7 6.3 Habitability indicator. False positive 0.72, 0.82, 0.94, discriminant—could show ocean 1.12, 1.4 loss or presence of catalyst for CO2 recombination.h PREPUBLICATION COPY – SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION D-1

Molecules/ Feature 0.1-1.8 μm 1.8-2.5 μm 2.5-5.0 μm 5.0-20 μm Notes SO2 0.2, 0.29, 0.37 4.0 7.3, 8.8, Desiccation marker. High amounts 19.0 are likely incompatible with a surface ocean.i Ocean glintj 0.8-0.9 Habitability indicator. False positive (optimal) discriminant—disequilibrium biosignature when paired with O2/N2.k Vegetation 0.6 (halophile),l Biosignature sought. Other pigments red edge 0.7 may also generate spectral edges.n (photosynthesis —G dwarf)m Seasonal CO2 (1.6), CH4 CO2 (15) Biosignature sought—seasonal variability (1.1 and 1.4), variability in biomass building and O2/O3 metabolic output.o NOTE: All values in the table are given in microns (μm) and molecular band wavelengths are derived from HITRAN; Rothman et al. (2013).p SOURCE: Table modified from Meadows (2017).q a Greenblatt, G.D., J.J. Orlando, J.B. Burkholder, and A.R. Ravishankara. 1990. Absorption measurements of oxygen between 330 and 1140 nm. Journal of Geophysical Research 95(D11):18577; Hermans, C., A.C. Vandaele, M. Carleer, S. Fally, R. Colin, A. Jenouvrier, B. Coquart, and M.-F. Mérienne. 1999. Absorption cross-sections of atmospheric constituents: NO2, O2, and H2O. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 6(3):151; Maté, B., C. Lugez, G.T. Fraser, and W.J. Lafferty. 1999. Absolute intensities for the O2 1.27 μm continuum absorption. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(D23):30585; and Thalman, R. and R. Volkamer. 2013. Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of O2-O2 collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15:15371. b Schwieterman, E.W., V.S. Meadows, S.D. Domagal-Goldman, D. Deming, G.N. Arney, R. Luger, C.E. Harman, A. Misra, and R. Barnes. 2016. Identifying planetary biosignature impostors: spectral features of CO and O4 resulting from abiotic O2/O3 production. Astrophysical Journal Letters 819(1):L13. c Domagal-Goldman, S.D., A. Segura, M.W. Claire, T.D. Robinson, and V.S. Meadows. 2014. Abiotic ozone and oxygen in atmospheres similar to prebiotic Earth. Astrophysical Journal 792(2):90. d Krissansen-Totton, J., S. Olson, and D.C. Catling. 2018. Disequilibrium biosignatures over Earth history and implications for detecting exoplanet life. Science Advances 4(1):eaao5747. e Schwieterman (2016), op cit.; and Wang Y., Tian F., Li T., and Hu Y. (2016) On the detection of carbon monoxide as an anti-biosignature in exoplanetary atmospheres. Icarus 266:15. f Lafferty, W.J., A.M. Solodov, A. Weber, W.B. Olson, and J.M. Hartmann. 1996. Infrared collision-induced absorption by N(2) near 4.3 μm for atmospheric applications: measurements and empirical modeling. Applied Optics 35(30):5911. g Krissansen-Totton, J., D.S. Bergsman, and D.C. Catling. 2016. On detecting biospheres from chemical thermodynamic disequilibrium in planetary atmospheres. Astrobiology 16(1):39; and Schwieterman (2016), op cit. h Gao, P., R. Hu, R.D. Robinson, C. Li, and Y.L. Yung. 2015. Stability of CO2 atmospheres on desiccated M dwarf exoplanets. Astrophysical Journal 806(2):249; Schwieterman (2016), op cit.; and Tian, G., K. France, J.L. Linsky, P.J.D. Mauas, and M.C. Vieytes. 2014. High stellar FUV/NUV ratio and oxygen contents in the atmospheres of potentially habitable planets. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 385:22. i Meadows, V.S., G.N. Arney, E.W. Schweiterman, J. Lustig-Yaeger, A.P. Lincowski, T. Robinson, S.D. Domagal- Goldman, et al. 2018. The habitability of Proxima Centauri b: environmental states and observational discriminants. Astrobiology 18(2):133. PREPUBLICATION COPY – SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION D-2

j Robinson, T.D., V.S. Meadows, and D. Crisp. 2010. Detecting oceans on extrasolar planets using the glint effect. Astrophysical Journal Letters 721(1):L67. k Krissansen-Totton (2016), op cit.; Robinson (2010), op cit; and Zugger M.E., J.F. Kasting, D.M. Williams, T.J. Kane, and C.R. Philbrick. 2011. Searching for water earths in the near-infrared. Astrophysical Journal 739(1):12. l Schwieterman, E.W., T.D. Robinson, V.S. Meadows, A. Misra, and S. Domagal-Goldman. 2015. Detecting and constraining N2 abundances in planetary atmospheres using collisional pairs. Astrophysical Journal 810(1):57. m Gates, D.M. 1965. Energy, Plants, and Ecology. Ecology 46(1-2):1. n Arnold, L. 2008. Earthshine observation of vegetation and implication for life detection on other planets. Space Science Review 135:323; Kiang N.Y., J. Siefert, Govindjee, and R.E. Blankenship. 2007. Spectral signatures of photosynthesis. I. Review of Earth organisms. Astrobiology 7:222; and Schwieterman (2015), op cit. o Meadows, V.S. 2006. Modelling the diversity of extrasolar terrestrial planets. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 1:25; and Olson, S.L., E.W. Schwieterman, C.T. Reinhard, A. Ridgwell, S.R. Kane, V.S. Meadows, and T.W. Lyons. 2018. Atmospheric seasonality as an exoplanet biosignature. Astrophysical Journal Letters 858(2):L14. p Rothman L.S., I.E. Gordon, Y. Babikov, A. Barbe, D.C. Benner, P.F. Bernath, M. Birk, L. Bizzocchi, V. Boudon, L.R. Brown, A. Campargue, K. Chance, E.A. Cohen, L.H. Coudert, V.M. Devi, B.J. Drouin, A. Fayt, J.-M. Flaud, R.R. Gamache, J.J. Harrison, J.-M. Hartmann, C. Hill, J.T. Hodges, D. Jacquemart, A. Jolly, J. Lamouroux, R.J. Le Roy, G. Li, D.A. Long, O.M. Lyulin, C.J. Mackie, S.T. Massie, S. Mikhailenko, H.S.P. Müller, O.V. Naumenko, A.V. Nikitin, J. Orphal, V. Perevalov, A. Perrin, E.R. Polovtseva, C. Richard, M.A.H. Smith, E. Starikova, K. Sung, S. Tashkun, J. Tennyson, G.C. Toon, Vl.G. Tyuterev, and G. Wagner. 2013. The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 130:4. q Meadows, V.S. 2017. Reflections on O2 as a biosignature in exoplanetary atmospheres. Astrobiology 17(10):1022. PREPUBLICATION COPY – SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION D-3

Next: Appendix E: Committee and Staff Biographical Information »
Exoplanet Science Strategy Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $55.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The past decade has delivered remarkable discoveries in the study of exoplanets. Hand-in-hand with these advances, a theoretical understanding of the myriad of processes that dictate the formation and evolution of planets has matured, spurred on by the avalanche of unexpected discoveries. Appreciation of the factors that make a planet hospitable to life has grown in sophistication, as has understanding of the context for biosignatures, the remotely detectable aspects of a planet’s atmosphere or surface that reveal the presence of life.

Exoplanet Science Strategy highlights strategic priorities for large, coordinated efforts that will support the scientific goals of the broad exoplanet science community. This report outlines a strategic plan that will answer lingering questions through a combination of large, ambitious community-supported efforts and support for diverse, creative, community-driven investigator research.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!