Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Appendix E Public Committee Meeting Agendas and Proceedings of a Workshopâin Brief The committee held 10 in-person meetings from January 2018 through March 2020; portions of 4 of these meetings were open to the public as part of the committeeâs information gathering for this study: ï· The committeeâs first in-person meeting, held in January 2018, included an open session at which the sponsors of the study provided their perspectives on the charge to the committee, and state and local public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR) practitioners provided additional background information and context for the study. ï· The committeeâs second in-person meeting, held in April 2018, included a public session at which the committee heard from researchers who have conducted similar reviews and grading of PHEPR practices to understand the nature of the evidence base, as well as the methods used and challenges experienced, and to hear from experts whose input helped inform the committeeâs prioritization of PHEPR Capabilities for this review. ï· The committeeâs July 2018 in-person meeting included a public session at which researchers and practitioners discussed existing evidence-grading frameworks used to evaluate the effectiveness of practices in health and nonhealth fields, the potential application of those existing frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of PHEPR practices, and the potential role of evidence gleaned from sources other than controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies in an evidence review methodology for PHEPR practices. A summary of this discussion is captured in a Proceedings of a Workshopâin Brief.1 ï· The committeeâs January 2019 in-person meeting included a public session at which the committee engaged with PHEPR practitioners to identify knowledge gaps that matter to them, and to assess the relative priority, from their perspective, of potential evidence review topics encompassed within the 15 Centers for Disease Control and 1 Available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25510 (accessed June 18, 2020). PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS E-1
E-2 EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE FOR PHEPR Prevention (CDC) PHEPR Capabilities (see Appendix A for the results of this activity). PUBLIC COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDAS Monday, January 29, 2018 Keck Center of the National Academies Room 208 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 OPEN SESSION SESSION III Sponsor Briefing: Discussion of the Committeeâs Charge Objective: To hear from the sponsors of the study regarding their perspectives on the charge to the committee. 1:30 p.m. Welcome and Introductions NED CALONGE, Committee Chair President and Chief Executive Officer The Colorado Trust 1:45 p.m. Sponsor Perspective on Charge to the Committee ERIC CARBONE, Study Sponsor Director, Office of Applied Research Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2:15 p.m. Discussion with Committee 3:15 p.m. Break SESSION IV: Additional Context for the StudyâDefining the Problem Objective: To obtain additional background information and context for the study. 3:30 p.m. Local Perspective SETH FOLDY Director, Epidemiology, Informatics, and Preparedness Denver Public Health MAC MCCLENDON Director, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Harris County Public Health State Perspective PAUL PETERSEN PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS
APPENDIX E E-3 Director, Emergency Preparedness Program Tennessee Department of Health MARISSA LEVINE State Health Commissioner Virginia Department of Health 4:00 p.m. Discussion with Committee 5:15 p.m. ADJOURN OPEN SESSION Tuesday, April 24, 2018 National Academy of Sciences Building Lecture Room 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 OPEN SESSION 1:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions NED CALONGE, Committee Chair President and Chief Executive Officer The Colorado Trust SESSION III: Researcher Session Objectives: 1. To hear from researchers who have conducted similar reviews and grading of preparedness and response practices in the past to understand the nature of the evidence base as well as the methods used and the challenges experienced; and 2. To hear from experts who can inform the prioritization of the public health preparedness capabilities. 1:05 p.m. MICHAEL STOTO Professor of Health Systems Administration and Population Health Georgetown University 1:50 p.m. YASMIN KHAN Consultant Physician Public Health Ontario 2:35 p.m. VALERIE YEAGER Associate Professor for Health Policy and Management Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health 3:20 p.m. Break 3:30 p.m. MARCIA TESTA PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS
E-4 EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE FOR PHEPR Senior Lecturer on Biostatistics Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health 4:15 p.m. GLEN MAYS Scutchfield Endowed Professor of Health Services and Systems Research University of Kentucky College of Public Health 5:00 p.m. JENNIFER HORNEY Department Head and Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Texas A&M University Health Science Center School of Public Health 5:45 p.m. Full Discussion with Committee 6:00 p.m. ADJOURN OPEN SESSION Thursday, July 26, 2018 National Academy of Sciences Building Lecture Room 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20418 OPEN SESSION 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions NED CALONGE, Committee Chair President and Chief Executive Officer The Colorado Trust SESSION I: Methodologies for Evaluating and Grading Evidence Objectives: 1. To examine similarities and differences between existing frameworks used to grade evidence of effectiveness for practices in health and nonhealth fields. 2. To discuss the potential application and adaptation of existing evidence-grading frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of public health preparedness and response practices. 3. To explore the potential role of evidence generated from sources other than randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies in an evidence review methodology for public health preparedness and response practices. 9:05 a.m. Panel 1: Evidence-Grading Frameworks in Health and Nonhealth Fields GUIDE TO COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE SERVICES RANDY ELDER Health Scientist, Guidelines and Recommendations Activity Office of Science Quality, Office of the Associate Director for Science Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS
APPENDIX E E-5 GRADE AND GRADE-CERQUAL HOLGER SCHÃNEMANN (VIA TELECONFERENCE) GRADE Co-Chair Co-Director World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Evidence Informed Policy Professor and Chair of the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Professor of Medicine McMaster University JANE NOYES Professor in Health and Social Services Research and Child Health Bangor University WHAT WORKS CLEARINGHOUSE JEFFREY VALENTINE Professor and Program Coordinator, Educational Psychology, Measurement, and Evaluation College of Education and Human Development University of Louisville CLEARINGHOUSE FOR LABOR EVALUATION AND RESEARCH DEMETRA NIGHTINGALE Institute Fellow Urban Institute COUNTERMEASURES THAT WORK KRISTIE JOHNSON Research Psychologist, Office of Behavioral Safety Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 11:05 a.m. Break 11:15 a.m. Full Panel Discussion with Committee 12:15 p.m. Working Lunch 1:00 p.m. Panel 2: Additional Evidence Evaluation Methods for Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions and Practices JEFF MARCUS Aviation Safety Recommendation Specialist, Safety Recommendations Division National Transportation Safety Board JENNIFER BISHOP Chief, Writing and Editing Division, Office of Aviation Safety National Transportation Safety Board PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS
E-6 EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE FOR PHEPR J. D. POLK Chief Health and Medical Officer National Aeronautics and Space Administration MICHAEL WOOLCOCK Lead Social Scientist, Development Research Group The World Bank 1:45 p.m. Full Panel Discussion with Committee 2:30 p.m. Break (Committee Convenes in Closed Session) 3:00 p.m. Discussion with Panels 1 and 2 4:00 p.m. ADJOURN OPEN SESSION Thursday, January 10, 2019 Beckman Center of the National Academies Huntington Room 100 Academy Way Irvine, CA 92617 OPEN SESSION SESSION V Practitioner Input on Review Topic Priorities Objective: 1. To identify priority topics for future evidence reviews based on practitioner input on critical knowledge gaps for PHEPR practices. 1:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions NED CALONGE, Committee Chair President and Chief Executive Officer The Colorado Trust 1:15 p.m. In-Person PHEPR Practitioner Prioritization Activity ï· Review the intended use for the results from this activity ï· Review activities and results from January 7 web-based meeting ï· Review and rate priority level for each practice 6:00 p.m. ADJOURN OPEN SESSION PREPUBLICATION COPY: UNCORRECTED PROOFS