Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
NOTES 73 ⢠TrainingâThe high rate of technological change in both the product and workplace that characterizes the industry imposes a special requirement that there be mechanisms allowing workers to develop new skills and to share equitably in the fruits of technology. It is believed that resolution of these issues will promote the flexibility and efficiency of the industry, advance its ability to maintain a competitive lead in the incorporation of new technologies, and allocate costs and benefits more fairly across the industry and the economy. NOTES 1. E.L. Thomas, ''DeregulatedâATA Maintenance and Engineering," Air Transport Association of America, presentation at 1981 ATA Engineering and Maintenance Forum, San Diego, Cal., October 27â29, 1981. 2. D. W. Caves, Laurits R. Christensen, Michael W. Threthway, "Productivity Performance of U.S. Trunk and Local Service Airlines in the Era of Deregulation," Economic Inquiry, Vol. XV, Number 3, July 1983, pp. 312â324. 3. New York Times Magazine, February 19, 1984, pp. 42â55. 4. Paul R. Ignatius, Air Transport Association of America, statement before the Aviation Subcommittee on Public Works and Transportation Committee, U.S. House of Representatives, May 24, 1983. 5. Airline Executive, November 1983, pp. 39, 40. 6. Aerospace Research Center. The Challenge of Foreign Competition, Foreign Competition Project Group, Commercial Transport Aircraft Committee, Aerospace Industries Association of America, March 1976. 7. Garret Turbine Engine Co., based partly on article in Financial Times of Canada, October 6, 1980. 8. (a) United States Trade Council, Japan's Aircraft Industry, Washington, D.C., January 11, 1980. (b) Ministry of International Trade and Industry, The Vision of MITI Policies in 1980s, Tokyo, Ministry of International Trade and Industry, March 17, 1980. (c) "Technology and EnvironmentâMITI Plans Development of New Aeronautical Technology," The Japan Economic Journal, June 10, 1980. (d) Report to the Chairman, Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress, "Industrial Policy: Case Studies in the Japanese Experience," GAO, October 20, 1982.
NOTES 74 (e)Japanese Industrial Policies and the Development of High Technology Industries, Computers and Aircraft, U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, February 1983, pg. 39. (f)Japan Air Transport Handbook, May 1981, pg. 91. 9. The CF6 series (or P&W JT9D series) engines are used. The CF-6-50 is a GE-designed engine that is produced jointly by GE, SNECMA, and MTU of West Germany for the A300 application. GE produces about two-thirds of the engines and SNECMA and MTU the rest. 10. From conversations of Lowell W. Steele with British aviation representatives, February 1983. 11. Transcript of documentary program "The Fifth EstateâCanadair" produced and shown by Canadian Broadcasting Company, April 14, 1983. 12. From conversations of Lowell W. Steele with representatives of Airbus Industrie in Great Britain, France, and West Germany. 13. John Newhouse, "A Reporter at Large. A Sporty Game III: Big, Bigger, Jumbo." The New Yorker, June 28, 1982, p. 58. 14. "Aerospace Surveys," The Economist, August 30, 1980, pp. 5â22. 15. The impact of current U.S. antitrust statutes and practices regarding technological innovation and product development in the aircraft industry was a topic of recurrent discussion by panel members. However, the panel did not develop a sense of priority regarding the urgency of this subject nor did it reach a consensus concerning the desirability of revisions in the statutes and enforcement guidelines.
