National Academies Press: OpenBook

For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop (2012)

Chapter: 17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers

« Previous: 16- Data Center-Library Cooperation in Data Publication in Ocean Science
Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×

17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers

Vishwas Chavan1
Global Biodiversity Information Facility

I am going to focus on how we are working to resolve the issue of data citation for biodiversity data at the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), located in Copenhagen, Denmark. For those who have not heard about GBIF, it is a multilateral intergovernmental initiative established in 2001 with 52 countries as members and 47 international organizations. GBIF’s main objective is to facilitate free and open access to biodiversity data. Our data is available through a portal and currently, includes 312,000,000 data records about existence of lands and animals across the globe from over 1800 data resources that has been contributed by 342 data publishers.

Why do we think that data citation is important? We believe that data citation will encourage our data publishers to publish more and more datasets. Therefore, it will improve data discovery. It will also provide some kind of encouragement for data preservation. Furthermore, it will provide incentives to those who use the data through improving the credibility of the interpretations that are based on the data.

What is the current practice of data citation in the GBIF network? Let me explain this with an example. A user comes to GBIF’s portal and searches for the term “Panthera Tigris.” She gets 696 records from 37 different datasets, which are published by 31 different publishers. The current citation style just says “access through GBIF data portal” and lists out all the access points of those 37 datasets. The problem with this practice is that it doesn’t tell me what was the search string unless and until I can make an explicit statement about it, how many records were retrieved, how many data publishers contributed to the retrieved data, when search was carried out, who are the original contributors of the data, and who plays what role in the process from collection to publishing of the data?

So, certainly there is a need to work around these challenges. What is needed is a data citation mechanism with a defined citation style that can provide recognition to all stakeholders involved with their roles, such as who is the producer of the data, who is the publisher, who is the aggregator, and who provided curation service to the data. Given the complexity of our network, we require cascading citations, which are citations within the citations. Furthermore, we need a data citation service whereby a publisher can go and register its citation and all documents of metadata. Finally, we need a discovery service, which resolves to the full-text citation and links to the underlying data.

One of the first things that we think we need is a best practices guide for how to cite data. For that, we require two types of recommended styles. One is related to publisher supplied dataset citation and the other is related to query based citations. The publisher supplied dataset citation would obviously need to consider the types of publishers (e.g., an individual, a group of

______________________

1 Presentation slides are available at http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/brdi/PGA_064019.

Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×

individuals, or an institution). We also need to recognize individual’s role in creating the dataset. We need also to identify when it was first released or whether it is a one-time release or frequently updated. Also, the citation should link back to the primary URI of the dataset and then the citation itself needs to have a persistent identifier (preferably DOI) so the entire citation string can be resolved. Also, we need to consider the date of the first release, the latest updates, and the number of data records that we can actually access from a particular dataset.

Table 17-1 provides a sampling of GBIF’s styles for potential citation strings or styles for the publisher supplied citations.

Complete formulation Short formulation
Style 1 Publisher (individual) with one-time release of dataset
Publisher (YEAR), <Title of the data resource>, <total nos. of records>, published <modes of publishing>. <Primary access point>, released on: <release date>. <Persistent Identifier>. Publisher (YEAR). <Persistent Identifier1>.
Style 2 Publisher (individual) with frequent update or release of dataset
Publisher (YEAR). <Title of the data resource>, <total nos. of records>, published <modes of publishing>. >Primary access point>, first <released on; release date>, <current version no. or last updated released on (date)>, <Persistent Identifier>. Publisher (Year first published're leased -). <Version no., or last updated released on (date)> . Persistent Identifier.
Style 3 Publisher (group of individuals) with one time release of dataset
Publisher J, ..... and Publisher n (YEAR). <Tide of the data resource>, <total nos. of records>, published <modes of publishing>. <Primary access point>, released on <release date>, <Persistent Identifier>. Publisher 1 etal. (YEAR). Persistent Identifier.
Style 4 Publisher (group of individuals) nith frequent update or release of dataset
Publisher 1,..... and Publisher n <YEAR). <Title of the data resource>, <total nos. of records>, published <modes of publishing>. <Primary access point>, first released on' <release date>, <current version no. or last updated/released on (date)>. <Persistent Identifier> Publisher 1 etal. <YEAR (Year first published released -)>. <Version no.,or last updated released on (date)>. Persistent Identifier.
Style 5 Institute consortium (multiple contributors) nith one time release of dataset
<Publisher as Institution / Research Group ' Consortium> (YEAR). <Tide of the data resource>, <total nos. of records>. <Contributed by contributor l(role), contributor 2 (role)..... contributor n(role)>, '<published (modes of publishing)>. <Primary access point>. released on- <release date>. <Persistent Identifier>. <Publisher as Institution / Research Group / Consortium> (YEAR). <PersistentIdentifier>
Style 6 Institute, consortium (multiple contributors) nith frequent update or release of dataset.
<Publisher as Institution '' Research Group ' Consortium> <YEAR (Year first published released -)>. <Tide of the data resource1>, <total nos. of records>, <Contributed by contributor l(role), contributor 2 (role)..... contributor n(role)>, <published (modes of publishing)>. <Primary access point>.<Version no., or last updated released on (date)>. <Persistent Identifier> . <Publisher as Institution / Research Group / Consortium > <YEAR (Year fust published 1 released -)>, <Version no., or last updated released on (date)>, <Persistent Identifiers>
Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×

In the case of the query based citations, where we need to have citations within citations, there are two types of citations that we think are required. One is query based citations and the other publisher supplied dataset citations. Such a citation needs to have multiple types of persistent identifiers that have been assigned or used by publishers themselves.

So, going back to the example of the user who searched for the term “Panthera Tigris”, a hypothetical exemplification of this search is presented in Figure 17-1. This query based citation will resolve to complete computer citation and it can also link back to the snapshot of the retrieved data, which are cited. This is how it will look like when you resolve the DOI:

images

FIGURE 17-1 Hypothetical search result.

Let me conclude with a summary of the implementation and next steps. The main challenge to implement this mechanism is the complexity of data management itself. How do we make sure that all our data publishers are going to follow through the citation style that is being proposed? There is also the complexity of the data network because many publishers publish the data through more than one access point.

Therefore, we urgently need to have all these citation styles propagated in the form of a best practice guide. However, we also need to remember that there are social challenges related to updating the current practices. Finally, somebody has to come forward to run the data citation service. These are some of the challenges that we are currently trying to address.

Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"17- Data Citation Mechanism and Service for Scientific Data: Defining a Framework for Biodiversity Data Publishers." National Research Council. 2012. For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13564.
×
Page 116
Next: 18- How to Cite an Earth Science Dataset? »
For Attribution: Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The growth of electronic publishing of literature has created new challenges, such as the need for mechanisms for citing online references in ways that can assure discoverability and retrieval for many years into the future. The growth in online datasets presents related, yet more complex challenges. It depends upon the ability to reliably identify, locate, access, interpret, and verify the version, integrity, and provenance of digital datasets. Data citation standards and good practices can form the basis for increased incentives, recognition, and rewards for scientific data activities that in many cases are currently lacking in many fields of research. The rapidly-expanding universe of online digital data holds the promise of allowing peer-examination and review of conclusions or analysis based on experimental or observational data, the integration of data into new forms of scholarly publishing, and the ability for subsequent users to make new and unforeseen uses and analyses of the same data-either in isolation, or in combination with, other datasets.

The problem of citing online data is complicated by the lack of established practices for referring to portions or subsets of data. There are a number of initiatives in different organizations, countries, and disciplines already underway. An important set of technical and policy approaches have already been launched by the U.S. National Information Standards Organization (NISO) and other standards bodies regarding persistent identifiers and online linking.

The workshop summarized in For Attribution -- Developing Data Attribution and Citation Practices and Standards: Summary of an International Workshop was organized by a steering committee under the National Research Council's (NRC's) Board on Research Data and Information, in collaboration with an international CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices. The purpose of the symposium was to examine a number of key issues related to data identification, attribution, citation, and linking to help coordinate activities in this area internationally, and to promote common practices and standards in the scientific community.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!