National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: REFERENCES
Suggested Citation:"INTRODUCTION." National Research Council. 1991. Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions -- The Uses of Microsimulation Modeling: Volume II, Technical Papers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1853.
×
Page 305
Suggested Citation:"INTRODUCTION." National Research Council. 1991. Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions -- The Uses of Microsimulation Modeling: Volume II, Technical Papers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/1853.
×
Page 306

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF U.S. POPULATION PROJECTION MODELS 305 9 Evaluating the Accuracy of U.S. Population Projection Models Laurence Grummer-Strawn and Thomas J.Espenshade INTRODUCTION Validation experiments of projections from microsimulation models have been relatively rare. Many reasons have been offered for this situation, including the complex nature and multiplicity of microsimulation calculations, the generally low priority given to assessments of error and sources of uncertainty, and the time pressures that usually surround policy debates and analyses. Perhaps more important than any of these, though, is the fact that microsimulation projections are typically conditional forecasts; they are answers to a series of “what if” questions. If none of the policy options being evaluated is ever adopted, it is difficult to validate and analyze the projected associated policy consequences. Moreover, as noted in Part I of Volume I, even if an analyzed policy is enacted in “pure” form, disentangling the multiple specific sources of potential error is often problematic. Finally, the policy process is inevitably handicapped in its ability to generate the kinds of information that would make validation possible on a regular basis. Once a particular program is adopted, for example, the program's features ma y be altered only occasionally, which makes it difficult to trace observed policy outcomes back to specific program elements. Laurence Grummer-Strawn and Thomas J.Espenshade are at the Office of Population Research, Princeton University; the latter served as a member of the Panel to Evaluate Microsimulation Models for Social Welfare Programs. The helpful comments of Eugene Ericksen, the generous cooperation of Alice Wade, and the technical assistance of Diane Van Houten are gratefully acknowledged.

EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF U.S. POPULATION PROJECTION MODELS 306 Population projections also are conditional forecasts; they, too, respond to a series of “what if” questions. Their products are projections of future total population size, rates of growth, and population composition by age, sex, race, and (sometimes) marital status, conditional on a set of specific assumptions about future patterns of fertility, mortality, and migration. Our review of the literature suggests, however, that, while not cornucopian, attempts to validate population projections are neither as rare nor as difficult as those stemming from microsimulation models. Population projections are far simpler than microsimulation models. First, cohort component models that are typically used to perform population projections are not behavioral models, thereby greatly simplifying the task. Instead they are mechanical deterministic models that capture the dynamic processes by which populations grow, age, and alter other features. Second, population projection models have only four ingredients. In addition to a baseline population that must be specified, assumptions about future trends in fertility, mortality, and migration are the only other required inputs. Third, in contrast to microsimulation models, cohort component population projection models are macrosimulation models (more precisely, cell-based models), implying drastic simplifications in both the number and the transparency of calculations performed. This chapter is concerned with two broad aspects of evaluating the accuracy of population projection models. First, we are interested in what can be learned from efforts to validate population projections in general, especially those performed with the aid of cohort component methods, regardless of whether the projections pertain specifically to the United States. Our aim is to illustrate the variety of methodologies that have been used to evaluate population projections and to highlight some of the relevant findings. Second, particular attention is focused on projections of the U.S. population prepared by the Bureau of the Census and the Social Security Administration's (SSA) Office of the Actuary. These projections are especially relevant because they are frequently used to calibrate microsimulation models. The nature of cohort component population projections is described in the next section. This is followed by a review of alternative validation strategies and outcomes for population projection models, including sensitivity analysis, external validation, and use of confidence intervals to assess variability in population forecasts. Our discussion draws on existing evaluations of population projection models as much as possible, but these are supplemented by our own analyses when feasible.

Next: NATURE OF POPULATION PROJECTION MODELS »
Improving Information for Social Policy Decisions -- The Uses of Microsimulation Modeling: Volume II, Technical Papers Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $100.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

This volume, second in the series, provides essential background material for policy analysts, researchers, statisticians, and others interested in the application of microsimulation techniques to develop estimates of the costs and population impacts of proposed changes in government policies ranging from welfare to retirement income to health care to taxes.

The material spans data inputs to models, design and computer implementation of models, validation of model outputs, and model documentation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!