National Academies Press: OpenBook

Issues in Risk Assessment (1993)

Chapter: TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL

« Previous: Appendix C Workshop Introduction
Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×

Appendix D
Opening Plenary Presentations

Terry F. Yosie Building Ecological Risk Assessment As A Policy Tool

Terry F. Yosie, vice president for health and environment of the American Petroleum Institute and former director of the Science Advisory Board, EPA, provided a broad policy view of issues related to ecological risk assessment. Dr. Yosie noted first that ecological risks have only recently been placed on the nation's policy agenda, in response to increasing public awareness of acid deposition, ozone depletion, climatic change, and other real or potential ecological problems. National and international concern for the environment will stimulate the search for methods and tools for managing ecological risks in the same way that concerns over environmental sources of cancer have stimulated the development of scientific methods and policy tools for regulating human exposure to carcinogens.

Dr. Yosie then posed six questions that must be answered as part of the development of ecological risk assessment methods.

  • What is ecological risk assessment?

  • Why is it needed?

  • What are the key methodological issues in using ecological risk assessment as a policy tool?

Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
  • What appropriate lessons can be learned from the health risk assessment experience?

  • How should ecological risk assessment be applied?

  • What are the needs and future directions for ecological risk assessment?

On the first question, Dr. Yosie noted that previous definitions of ecological risk assessment have ranged from simple statements of principle, such as the definition proposed by the Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC, 1987),

a set of formal scientific methods for estimating the probabilities and magnitudes of undesired effects [on plants, animals, and ecosystems] resulting from the release of chemicals, other human actions, or natural catastrophes.

to elaborate schemes for tiered toxicity testing, such as the hazard evaluation procedure used by the Monsanto Corporation (Kimerle et al., 1978). He suggested that an intermediate level of complexity is needed so that the risk assessment methods are simple and accessible enough for writers, policy analysts, and journalists to use with ease, but also technical enough to be useful to scientists and be responsive to advances in science.

Dr. Yosie provided three reasons why policy makers need ecological risk assessment. First, ecological risk assessments can help policy makers correctly diagnose environmental problems before the problems become crises. As an example, he cited EPA's assessment of the health and ecological risks of stratospheric ozone depletion, which stimulated the development of an international agreement to phase out chlorinated fluorocarbons (CFCs). Second, risk assessment is needed to set priorities, as was recently done in the EPA Science Advisory Board Report Reducing Risk (EPA, 1990). Third, risk assessment is needed to delineate the link between rational choices and societal values. The debate over global climate change, for example, is ultimately a debate over the responsibility of the current generation to future generations. Risk assessment can clarify the debate by making explicit the climate change consequences of different policy proposals.

As to the methodological issues central to using ecological risk assess-

Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×

ment as a policy tool, Dr. Yosie identified the determination of baseline conditions of ecosystems as a means of assessing the need for protection from development and the estimation of the magnitude of naturally-occurring environmental change in the absence of human intervention.

Dr. Yosie noted that, despite some successes, health risk assessment had yielded few lessons in health-policy decision-making. In part, the failure reflects that it has been more difficult than anticipated to develop and apply health risk assessment methods. In addition, health risk assessments have often been colored by ideological considerations (e.g., arguments over the concept of the maximum exposed individual) or have bogged down over technical questions (e.g., the relevance of rodent data to human risk). In Dr. Yosie's view, these debates have not assisted policy-makers in making informed public health decisions, but they can and they should. There will be increased pressure from EPA, Congress, and the private sector to address broader questions. There is a danger that ecological risk assessment will follow a similarly narrow path, but there is still time to prevent this from happening.

Dr. Yosie provided two examples of how ecological risk assessment can be applied in policy making. Both government and industry, for different reasons, need ecological risk assessment as an aid in contingency planning for and response to oil spills and other kinds of accidents that have ecological impacts. The U.S. oil industry alone will spend more than $900 million over the next 5 years in improving its capability to prevent or respond to oil spills; ecological risk assessment can aid in ensuring cost effectiveness. Similarly, ecological risk assessment can contribute to implementation of total quality management, which is being adopted in many organizations; pollutant releases or obvious ecological impacts can be indicators of inefficient operation.

Finally, Dr. Yosie tried to map out the future of ecological risk assessment with a conceptual policy-triangle. One part of the triangle is ecological risk assessment, which identifies ecological problems, assesses their magnitudes, and provides a perspective on priorities. The second part of the triangle is pollution prevention, aided by the insights provided by ecological risk assessment. Ecological risk assessment and pollution prevention support the third leg, sustainable development. Sustainable development assumes a balanced approach whereby economic growth and environmental improvements proceed together to improve both living standards and the quality of human life and ecosystems.

Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
Page 283
Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
Page 284
Suggested Citation:"TERRY F. YOSIE BUILDING ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY TOOL." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
Page 285
Next: D. WARNER NORTH: RELATIONSHIP OF WORKSHOP TO NRC'S 1983 RED BOOK REPORT »
Issues in Risk Assessment Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The scientific basis, inference assumptions, regulatory uses, and research needs in risk assessment are considered in this two-part volume.

The first part, Use of Maximum Tolerated Dose in Animal Bioassays for Carcinogenicity, focuses on whether the maximum tolerated dose should continue to be used in carcinogenesis bioassays. The committee considers several options for modifying current bioassay procedures.

The second part, Two-Stage Models of Carcinogenesis, stems from efforts to identify improved means of cancer risk assessment that have resulted in the development of a mathematical dose-response model based on a paradigm for the biologic phenomena thought to be associated with carcinogenesis.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!